>From: Bernhard Slominski <
bernhard.slominski@...>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I guess it makes sense, to make the merger a post JSF 2 project.
> So all features, which are included in JSF 2 (e.g Remoting) should not move,
> but just stay in Shale.
> Also let's see where templating and component development goes before making
> a decision about Clay.
> So Shale is then the JSF 1.X add-on framework, when it comes to JSF 2 all
> Add-Ons move to MyFaces.
>
Well, that is fine with me but realistically, we would be talking about next summer then.
> Bernhard
>
Gary
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von:
craigmcc@... [mailto:
craigmcc@...]Im Auftrag
> > von Craig
> > McClanahan
> > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2007 01:48
> > An: MyFaces Development; Shale Developers List
> > Betreff: Re: Merging Shale into MyFaces
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > * Remoting
> > > > Unsure, as most of this can be done with PPR too.
> > >
> > > +1 This is pretty useful and easy to use, and will affect JSF 2.0.
> >
> > A secondary benefit is near-zero config for resource access,
> > particularly for resources provided in a jar file instead of as
> > exploded files in a WAR. Until JSF 2 comes along, that's pretty
> > useful all by itself.
> >
> >
> > Craig
> >
