|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
About Bioperl - patch - installation WindowsDear,
There are some problems about bioperl installation on Windows. I am using bioperl on Windows XP, Vista, ... and I use activeperl 5.8 and some times 5.10. for module installation , I use ppm on Windows system and sometimes I use cpan or build via compilation. The problem now is about ppm. There are 2 repositories to install bioperl : 1- trouchelle, there are : - bioperl 1.4, 1.5.2_100 - bioperl-db 0.01, 1.5.2_100 - bioperl-run 1.2.2 ... 2- BioPerl ( http://bioperl.org/DIST), there are : - BioPerl 1.6.1 - bioperl-db 1.5.2_100 - bioperl-network 1.5.2_100 - bioperl-run 1.5.2_100 - Bundle-BioPerl-Core 1.6.1 .... I have seen the package.XML of BioPerl repository : ... <SOFTPKG NAME="GD-SVG" VERSION="0.25"> <SOFTPKG NAME="SVG-Graph" VERSION="0.01"> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene" VERSION="1.09"> <SOFTPKG NAME="Class-AutoClass" VERSION="1.01"> <SOFTPKG NAME="Graph" VERSION="0.80"> <SOFTPKG NAME="GraphViz" VERSION="2.04"> <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-db" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Db" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-network" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Network" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-run" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Run" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> <SOFTPKG NAME="BioPerl" VERSION="1.6.1" DATE="2009-9-29"> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Core" VERSION="1.6.1" DATE="2009-9-29"> ... The file have been updated at 10 October 2009 but some files are old. Then, it is impossible to many people using bioperl on Windows to update correctly bioperl. And, it is difficult to me to send you a patch about clustalw and primer3 modules because I can not install BioPerl-run-1.6.1 on my Windows PC. I have seen another BioPerl repository ( http://bioperl.org/DIST/RC) and there are the same problems. BioPerl-Run.ppd <SOFTPKG NAME="BioPerl-Run" VERSION="1,006000_001,0,0"> <TITLE>BioPerl-Run</TITLE> <ABSTRACT>BioPerl-Run - wrapper toolkit</ABSTRACT> <AUTHOR>BioPerl Team <bioperl-l@...></AUTHOR> <IMPLEMENTATION> <DEPENDENCY NAME="Bio-Root-Version" VERSION="1,006001,0,0" /> <CODEBASE HREF="PPM-BioPerl-Run-1.006000_001.tar.gz" /> </IMPLEMENTATION> </SOFTPKG> BioPerl-DB.ppd <SOFTPKG NAME="BioPerl-DB" VERSION="1,006000_001,0,0"> <TITLE>BioPerl-DB</TITLE> <ABSTRACT>BioPerl-DB - package for biological databases</ABSTRACT> <AUTHOR>BioPerl Team <bioperl-l@...></AUTHOR> <IMPLEMENTATION> <DEPENDENCY NAME="Bio-Root-Version" VERSION="1,006001,0,0" /> <DEPENDENCY NAME="DBI" VERSION="0,0,0,0" /> <CODEBASE HREF="PPM-BioPerl-DB-1.006000_001.tar.gz" /> </IMPLEMENTATION> </SOFTPKG> BioPerl-Network.ppd <SOFTPKG NAME="BioPerl-Network" VERSION="1,006000_001,0,0"> <TITLE>BioPerl-Network</TITLE> <ABSTRACT>BioPerl-Network - package for biological networks</ABSTRACT> <AUTHOR>BioPerl Team <bioperl-l@...></AUTHOR> <IMPLEMENTATION> <DEPENDENCY NAME="Bio-Root-Version" VERSION="1,006001,0,0" /> <DEPENDENCY NAME="Graph" VERSION="0,86,0,0" /> <CODEBASE HREF="PPM-BioPerl-Network-1.006000_001.tar.gz" /> </IMPLEMENTATION> </SOFTPKG> Nevertheless there are PPM-BioPerl-Run-1.6.1_001.tar.gz, PPM-BioPerl-DB-1.6.0_001.tar.gz, PPM-BioPerl-Network-1.6.0_001.tar.gz files. Can you try to update all your ppd files on your repositories because it is a real problem to many lab and user wich try to updated bioperl and use it on Windows server. Best Regards, Djibril Ousmanou _______________________________________________ Bioperl-l mailing list Bioperl-l@... http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l |
|
|
Re: About Bioperl - patch - installation WindowsDjibril,
(Comments interspersed) On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:00 AM, djibrilo wrote: > Dear, > > There are some problems about bioperl installation on Windows. > I am using bioperl on Windows XP, Vista, ... and I use activeperl > 5.8 and some times 5.10. for module installation > , I use ppm on Windows system and sometimes I use cpan or build via > compilation. > > The problem now is about ppm. In general, I understand that mixing perl versions on Windows is NOT recommended unless you know what you are doing. Not sure about upgrading, but this is problematic through PPM for many reasons, first being PPMs are missing (DB_File is a dummy PPM on ActivePerl) and others are problematic (SOAP::Lite is apparently an issue). > There are 2 repositories to install bioperl : > 1- trouchelle, there are : > - bioperl 1.4, 1.5.2_100 > - bioperl-db 0.01, 1.5.2_100 > - bioperl-run 1.2.2 > ... > > 2- BioPerl ( http://bioperl.org/DIST), there are : > - BioPerl 1.6.1 > - bioperl-db 1.5.2_100 > - bioperl-network 1.5.2_100 > - bioperl-run 1.5.2_100 > - Bundle-BioPerl-Core 1.6.1 > .... > > I have seen the package.XML of BioPerl repository : > > ... > <SOFTPKG NAME="GD-SVG" VERSION="0.25"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="SVG-Graph" VERSION="0.01"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene" VERSION="1.09"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="Class-AutoClass" VERSION="1.01"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="Graph" VERSION="0.80"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="GraphViz" VERSION="2.04"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-db" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Db" VERSION="1.5.2_100" > DATE="2006-12-6"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-network" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Network" VERSION="1.5.2_100" > DATE="2006-12-6"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-run" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Run" VERSION="1.5.2_100" > DATE="2006-12-6"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="BioPerl" VERSION="1.6.1" DATE="2009-9-29"> > <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Core" VERSION="1.6.1" DATE="2009-9-29"> > ... > > The file have been updated at 10 October 2009 but some files are > old. Then, it is impossible to many people using bioperl on Windows to > update correctly bioperl. And, it is difficult to me to send you a > patch about clustalw and primer3 modules because I can not install > BioPerl-run-1.6.1 on my Windows PC. I'll remove the older ones. Just to note, I haven't uploaded the final CPAN releases and the PPMs for BioPerl-DB, BioPerl-Run, and BioPerl-Network to the repo yet, for many various reasons (I haven't had a chance to test them on Win being one of them). To acknowledge something Robert said in another post, Perl is generally configured to work best with UNIX'y flavors, but support for a UNIX-like Perl on Windows is growing, particularly with Strawberry Perl. > I have seen another BioPerl repository ( http://bioperl.org/DIST/RC) > and there are the same problems. Those are release candidates, and should be removed (they haven't been tested yet). The package.xml In the meantime, you can try out code very easily by setting your local PERL5LIB, or having a 'use lib' directive (this also works for bioperl-live). > Nevertheless there are PPM-BioPerl-Run-1.6.1_001.tar.gz, PPM- > BioPerl-DB-1.6.0_001.tar.gz, PPM-BioPerl-Network-1.6.0_001.tar.gz > files. > > Can you try to update all your ppd files on your repositories > because it is a real problem > to many lab and user wich try to updated bioperl and use it on > Windows server. > > Best Regards, > > Djibril Ousmanou We appreciate pointing these things out, I'll file them as a bug for tracking. This is probably the best way to address problems in the future. Also, realize this is a completely volunteer project. It takes an inordinate amount of our (not so free) time to work on BioPerl and related projects, so any help towards this end would be greatly appreciated, including contributing back. Personally, I am a Linux/OS X user and generally avoid anything Win-related (my preference) unless needed. I believe a large number of users here fall in the same category; we only have a couple of active Win users who have time to work on portability issues. I myself managed to get PPM and CPAN installation working by testing via Remote Desktop and (soonish) VM, but that's hardly optimal and is based on my schedule, which has been very busy as of late. To that end, we would really appreciate anyone volunteering and dedicating some time towards getting the Windows bits to work, otherwise Windows support will always be determined on how much time we dedicate to it (at the moment, that being very little). chris _______________________________________________ Bioperl-l mailing list Bioperl-l@... http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l |
|
|
Re: About Bioperl - patch - installation WindowsRe: PPM issues-- If you are experiencing a problem with "Apache ... SOAP::Lite", or other module gaps, see the workaround recently posted under http://www.bioperl.org/wiki/Installing_Bioperl_on_Windows#Comand-line_Installation > In general, I understand that mixing perl versions on Windows is NOT > recommended unless you know what you are doing. Even if you do, I wouldn't recommend it (except that you can learn a lot!) MAJ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Fields" <cjfields@...> To: "djibrilo" <djibrilo@...> Cc: <cjfields@...>; <bioperl-l@...> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 11:11 AM Subject: Re: [Bioperl-l] About Bioperl - patch - installation Windows > Djibril, > > (Comments interspersed) > > On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:00 AM, djibrilo wrote: > >> Dear, >> >> There are some problems about bioperl installation on Windows. >> I am using bioperl on Windows XP, Vista, ... and I use activeperl 5.8 and >> some times 5.10. for module installation >> , I use ppm on Windows system and sometimes I use cpan or build via >> compilation. >> >> The problem now is about ppm. > > In general, I understand that mixing perl versions on Windows is NOT > recommended unless you know what you are doing. Not sure about upgrading, > but this is problematic through PPM for many reasons, first being PPMs are > missing (DB_File is a dummy PPM on ActivePerl) and others are problematic > (SOAP::Lite is apparently an issue). > >> There are 2 repositories to install bioperl : >> 1- trouchelle, there are : >> - bioperl 1.4, 1.5.2_100 >> - bioperl-db 0.01, 1.5.2_100 >> - bioperl-run 1.2.2 >> ... >> >> 2- BioPerl ( http://bioperl.org/DIST), there are : >> - BioPerl 1.6.1 >> - bioperl-db 1.5.2_100 >> - bioperl-network 1.5.2_100 >> - bioperl-run 1.5.2_100 >> - Bundle-BioPerl-Core 1.6.1 >> .... >> >> I have seen the package.XML of BioPerl repository : >> >> ... >> <SOFTPKG NAME="GD-SVG" VERSION="0.25"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="SVG-Graph" VERSION="0.01"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene" VERSION="1.09"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="Class-AutoClass" VERSION="1.01"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="Graph" VERSION="0.80"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="GraphViz" VERSION="2.04"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-db" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Db" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-network" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Network" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="bioperl-run" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Run" VERSION="1.5.2_100" DATE="2006-12-6"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="BioPerl" VERSION="1.6.1" DATE="2009-9-29"> >> <SOFTPKG NAME="Bundle-BioPerl-Core" VERSION="1.6.1" DATE="2009-9-29"> >> ... >> >> The file have been updated at 10 October 2009 but some files are old. Then, >> it is impossible to many people using bioperl on Windows to >> update correctly bioperl. And, it is difficult to me to send you a patch >> about clustalw and primer3 modules because I can not install >> BioPerl-run-1.6.1 on my Windows PC. > > I'll remove the older ones. Just to note, I haven't uploaded the final CPAN > releases and the PPMs for BioPerl-DB, BioPerl-Run, and BioPerl-Network to the > repo yet, for many various reasons (I haven't had a chance to test them on > Win being one of them). > > To acknowledge something Robert said in another post, Perl is generally > configured to work best with UNIX'y flavors, but support for a UNIX-like Perl > on Windows is growing, particularly with Strawberry Perl. > >> I have seen another BioPerl repository ( http://bioperl.org/DIST/RC) and >> there are the same problems. > > Those are release candidates, and should be removed (they haven't been tested > yet). The package.xml In the meantime, you can try out code very easily by > setting your local PERL5LIB, or having a 'use lib' directive (this also works > for bioperl-live). > >> Nevertheless there are PPM-BioPerl-Run-1.6.1_001.tar.gz, PPM- >> BioPerl-DB-1.6.0_001.tar.gz, PPM-BioPerl-Network-1.6.0_001.tar.gz >> files. >> >> Can you try to update all your ppd files on your repositories because it is >> a real problem >> to many lab and user wich try to updated bioperl and use it on Windows >> server. >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Djibril Ousmanou > > > We appreciate pointing these things out, I'll file them as a bug for > tracking. This is probably the best way to address problems in the future. > > Also, realize this is a completely volunteer project. It takes an inordinate > amount of our (not so free) time to work on BioPerl and related projects, so > any help towards this end would be greatly appreciated, including > contributing back. Personally, I am a Linux/OS X user and generally avoid > anything Win-related (my preference) unless needed. I believe a large number > of users here fall in the same category; we only have a couple of active Win > users who have time to work on portability issues. > > I myself managed to get PPM and CPAN installation working by testing via > Remote Desktop and (soonish) VM, but that's hardly optimal and is based on my > schedule, which has been very busy as of late. To that end, we would really > appreciate anyone volunteering and dedicating some time towards getting the > Windows bits to work, otherwise Windows support will always be determined on > how much time we dedicate to it (at the moment, that being very little). > > chris > _______________________________________________ > Bioperl-l mailing list > Bioperl-l@... > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l > > _______________________________________________ Bioperl-l mailing list Bioperl-l@... http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/bioperl-l |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |