Anyone going to IETF 75 in Stockholm?

[John R. Levine]

If enough people are going and someone's willing to run the session, I can
ask for an ASRG session in Stockholm.  Otherwise, back to sleep.

So, anyone willing to add another anti-spam technique to the wiki?  It's
not hard.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@..., Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Information Superhighwayman wanna-be, http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
"More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom, revealingly.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[Peter Saint-Andre-2]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 5/22/09 4:14 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> If enough people are going and someone's willing to run the session, I
> can ask for an ASRG session in Stockholm.  Otherwise, back to sleep.

I'll be there.

> So, anyone willing to add another anti-spam technique to the wiki?  It's
> not hard.

I need to add something about IM spam (a.k.a. "spim"), especially with
regard to XMPP. I really will get around to that one of these days...

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoXLRsACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzdVwCg8dDMGjmzhoyAiZq91TFCKltF
VIsAoNWecNocZYRFDn7DxdvlzDuMr9iE
=5R5E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[Tony Hansen]

I'll be there.

        Tony

John R. Levine wrote:
> If enough people are going and someone's willing to run the session, I
> can ask for an ASRG session in Stockholm.  Otherwise, back to sleep.
>
> So, anyone willing to add another anti-spam technique to the wiki?  It's
> not hard.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[Ale2008]

John R. Levine wrote:
> If enough people are going and someone's willing to run the session, I
> can ask for an ASRG session in Stockholm.  Otherwise, back to sleep.

I had planned to go, but then failed to prepare a draft for
FixForwarding, thus I'd postpone my impact with IETF meetings :-(

> So, anyone willing to add another anti-spam technique to the wiki?  It's
> not hard.

I prepared an easier draft though, draft-vesely-vhlo. Is that worth
being advertised on the ASRG's wiki? (In short, it proposes to pass
the domain name instead of the ehlo's FQDN, so as to ease a number of
checks, including greylisting.)
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[John Levine-3]

Check this draft

John R. Levine wrote:
> If enough people are going and someone's willing to run the session, I
> can ask for an ASRG session in Stockholm.  Otherwise, back to sleep.

I had planned to go, but then failed to prepare a draft for
FixForwarding, thus I'd postpone my impact with IETF meetings :-(

> So, anyone willing to add another anti-spam technique to the wiki?  It's
> not hard.

I prepared an easier draft though, draft-vesely-vhlo. Is that worth
being advertised on the ASRG's wiki? (In short, it proposes to pass
the domain name instead of the ehlo's FQDN, so as to ease a number of
checks, including greylisting.)
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

[Ale2008]

It seems that draft looks rather confusing. Let me try and restate the
catch:

Client: I'd like to say Verified Hello and be whitelisted.
Server: Nope, I need to verify XYZ in order to whitelist you.
Client: OK, I've logged that. I'll just send by regular Hello then...
(Alternatively, client can send via BigESP, if being whitelisted is a
requisite for this message.)

Postmasters may count the occurrences of the XYZ keyword before
deciding what vouching enhancements it is worth to go for. I noted
that, while Microsoft has other means to push for, say, Sender-ID,
VHLO would enable even less massive ESPs to etch receivers' logs with
the name of their favorite filtering policy.

He said:
> Ah, a branding exercise.  That hadn't occurred to me.  Who knows, it might work.  Point it out on the ASRG list, we'll see if there's any interest.

Anyone?
       
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@...
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg