|
View:
New views
1 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Automating "secure" rippingHello,
After reading the old thread on "CD Ripping Uncertainty Principle?" and "CD Ripping Uncertainty Again" and looking at rubyripper, and its documents http://rubyforge.org/projects/rubyripper/ http://rubyforge.org/docman/?group_id=1284 I have decided to scratch my own itch and have recoded a slight variant of rubyripper in Python (I don't know ruby and the code was simple anyway). I had some main objectives: 1) Drop in replacement of cdparanoia. It should accept all the same switches. 2) No GUI. Since it can be used in place of cdparanoia, I can use a GUI that wraps it, like grip. 3) "Correction" by re-ripping a sector with where a problem occurred until it is the same twice in a row. This idea was borrowed from from rubyripper, but it is implemented asking for slightly more (two consecutive rips should be equal, not two out of "many") 4) If any correction is necessary, leave a log with the corrected positions, so the user can more easily verify the bad parts by him self. Note that the log is written whenever a correction is necessary, even if at the end the correction os possible. I have achieved everything with a slight constraint on (1): the last argument passed to secure-cdparanoia.py should be the name of the ripped track in the HD (so it doesn't support the -B option). If you want to take a look at the code or use it, grab it at http://www.ime.usp.br/~pjssilva/secure-cdparanoia.py All you need is Python (2.3 or newer) + cdparanoia in your PATH. Note that there is no guarantee that a "corrected track" is actually the correct track in the CD. It is simply based on the principle that if some bits are unstable in the disk, it should be more likely that they will map more often to the real, correct, bits. Then, if you see the same pattern twice in a row, it is more likely to be correct. Actually, I have a badly scratched CD with a track that sometimes pass this test for each sector after some trials, but that still generate different ripped files. EAC can not rip this track correctly either. This is possible because I only re-check sectors that presented differences in the first two rips. This is why a log file is *always* create when a difference is found, even if it is "corrected" at the end. Any thoughts? Paulo Obs: To avoid cache problems, the program always rip the entire track, even if it only want to correct one sector. Obs2: Bug reports are welcome. _______________________________________________ Paranoia mailing list Paranoia@... http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/paranoia |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |