|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Automod election statisticsHere are the statistics for elections that would've come out
differently had we used a 2/3 rule. Votes that would not have passed if we required 2/3 OR MORE votes: name | date --------------+------------ Shepard | 2005-07-04 natenobility | 2005-10-22 rODbegbie | 2005-10-22 Faugn | 2005-10-22 greycat | 2005-11-01 artysmokes | 2007-08-28 symphonick | 2007-10-17 artysmokes | 2007-10-19 Jim DeLaHunt | 2008-02-05 acid2 | 2008-04-18 mustaqila | 2008-04-18 If we would've required MORE than 2/3: name | date -----------------+------------ jemenake | 2004-10-28 Kamikatze | 2005-01-05 MithrandirBooga | 2005-01-31 Shepard | 2005-07-04 natenobility | 2005-10-22 rODbegbie | 2005-10-22 Faugn | 2005-10-22 greycat | 2005-11-01 mudcrow | 2006-02-11 Rhymeless | 2006-04-10 easterlingman | 2006-07-10 leivhe | 2007-01-06 BrianG | 2007-03-28 Cthulhu-fi | 2007-05-10 artysmokes | 2007-08-28 symphonick | 2007-10-17 artysmokes | 2007-10-19 Jim DeLaHunt | 2008-02-05 acid2 | 2008-04-18 mustaqila | 2008-04-18 tykling | 2008-06-23 Ironically enough there are some peeps that have turned out really good that wouldn't have made the cuts. I'm starting to think that keeping the simple majority might be better. -- --ruaok Somewhere in Texas a village is *still* missing its idiot. Robert Kaye -- rob@... -- http://mayhem-chaos.net _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-automods mailing list MusicBrainz-automods@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-automods |
|
|
Re: Automod election statisticsRobert Kaye wrote:
> Here are the statistics for elections that would've come out > differently had we used a 2/3 rule. Votes that would not have passed > if we required 2/3 OR MORE votes: > > name | date > --------------+------------ > Shepard | 2005-07-04 > natenobility | 2005-10-22 > rODbegbie | 2005-10-22 > Faugn | 2005-10-22 > greycat | 2005-11-01 > artysmokes | 2007-08-28 > symphonick | 2007-10-17 > artysmokes | 2007-10-19 > Jim DeLaHunt | 2008-02-05 > acid2 | 2008-04-18 > mustaqila | 2008-04-18 > > If we would've required MORE than 2/3: > > name | date > -----------------+------------ > jemenake | 2004-10-28 > Kamikatze | 2005-01-05 > MithrandirBooga | 2005-01-31 > Shepard | 2005-07-04 > natenobility | 2005-10-22 > rODbegbie | 2005-10-22 > Faugn | 2005-10-22 > greycat | 2005-11-01 > mudcrow | 2006-02-11 > Rhymeless | 2006-04-10 > easterlingman | 2006-07-10 > leivhe | 2007-01-06 > BrianG | 2007-03-28 > Cthulhu-fi | 2007-05-10 > artysmokes | 2007-08-28 > symphonick | 2007-10-17 > artysmokes | 2007-10-19 > Jim DeLaHunt | 2008-02-05 > acid2 | 2008-04-18 > mustaqila | 2008-04-18 > tykling | 2008-06-23 > > Ironically enough there are some peeps that have turned out really > good that wouldn't have made the cuts. > > I'm starting to think that keeping the simple majority might be better election doesn't mean they will never become an AutoEditor. Some just need some more time. When I look up that list, I can see several in the past couple of years that I agree probably needed more time. Some I don't think should ever have been nominated, but for most, failing an election isn't fatal. In retrospect, I wasn't ready when I became one and I should have had a few months longer to learn a few things from the experienced types. Chad / voice _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-automods mailing list MusicBrainz-automods@... http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-automods |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |