Bad reply address - was Re: Re: How to use inversion in if() - might be a bug report ?
|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: Bad reply address - was Re: Re: How to use inversion in if() - might be a bug report ?
by David Brown-4
::
Rate this Message:
Vaclav Peroutka wrote:
>> >> (Try to remember to post back to the list, rather than individual >> users, unless it is specifically an off-list email.) >> > > Sorry for that. I just pressed "Reply" button and did not noticed that > "To:" does not contain address of avr-gcc-list but sender's ( yours, in > this particular case) address. > > Now I will know, that I have to replace "To:" field every time I answer > into list. > Use the "reply all" button, rather than "reply". You can remove the individual sender's address, since they are already on the list. Some people find this inconvenient, and everyone makes a mistake on occasion and forgets to reply to the list, but it's easy enough when you get used to it and there are good reasons for having mailing lists configured in this way. mvh., David _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list |
|
|
RE: Bad reply address - was Re: Re: How to useinversion in if() - might be a bug report ?
by Weddington, Eric
::
Rate this Message:
> -----Original Message----- > From: > avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@... > [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of David Brown > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:31 AM > To: avr-gcc-list@... > Subject: Re: Bad reply address - was Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: > How to useinversion in if() - might be a bug report ? > > Vaclav Peroutka wrote: > >> > >> (Try to remember to post back to the list, rather than individual > >> users, unless it is specifically an off-list email.) > >> > > > > Sorry for that. I just pressed "Reply" button and did not > noticed that > > "To:" does not contain address of avr-gcc-list but sender's > ( yours, in > > this particular case) address. > > > > Now I will know, that I have to replace "To:" field every > time I answer > > into list. > > > > Use the "reply all" button, rather than "reply". You can remove the > individual sender's address, since they are already on the > list. Some > people find this inconvenient, and everyone makes a mistake > on occasion > and forgets to reply to the list, but it's easy enough when > you get used > to it and there are good reasons for having mailing lists > configured in > this way. You don't even have to do that. Just hit 'Reply All', type your response and hit send. The mailing list is set up (and most are this way) to not send a duplicate response to the person in the 'To' list if they are subscribed. However, if they are not subscribed to the list, then it will correctly send the response to the list and the person who is not subscribed, that way it ensures that they will see it. BTW, this is proper procedure for other projects like GCC, Binutils, GDB, etc. Do 'Reply All' and leave it alone unless you explicitly need to trim the CC list. _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list |
|
|
Re: Bad reply address - was Re: Re: How to useinversion in if() - might be a bug report ?
by David Brown-4
::
Rate this Message:
Weddington, Eric wrote:
> > >> -----Original Message----- From: >> avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@... >> [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@nongnu. org] >> On Behalf Of David Brown Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 3:31 AM >> To: avr-gcc-list@... Subject: Re: Bad reply address - was >> Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: How to useinversion in if() - might be a bug >> report ? >> >> Vaclav Peroutka wrote: >>>> (Try to remember to post back to the list, rather than >>>> individual users, unless it is specifically an off-list email.) >>>> >>>> >>> Sorry for that. I just pressed "Reply" button and did not >> noticed that >>> "To:" does not contain address of avr-gcc-list but sender's >> ( yours, in >>> this particular case) address. >>> >>> Now I will know, that I have to replace "To:" field every >> time I answer >>> into list. >>> >> Use the "reply all" button, rather than "reply". You can remove >> the individual sender's address, since they are already on the >> list. Some people find this inconvenient, and everyone makes a >> mistake on occasion and forgets to reply to the list, but it's easy >> enough when you get used to it and there are good reasons for >> having mailing lists configured in this way. > > You don't even have to do that. Just hit 'Reply All', type your > response and hit send. The mailing list is set up (and most are this > way) to not send a duplicate response to the person in the 'To' list > if they are subscribed. However, if they are not subscribed to the > list, then it will correctly send the response to the list and the > person who is not subscribed, that way it ensures that they will see > it. > > BTW, this is proper procedure for other projects like GCC, Binutils, > GDB, etc. Do 'Reply All' and leave it alone unless you explicitly > need to trim the CC list. Fair enough. I personally find it slightly more convenient if the extra lines are trimmed, but perhaps that's because I subscribe via gmane (due to my convoluted path for incoming email, which causes trouble for some mailing lists). It is much better to follow the standard procedure for mailing lists than to try to cater for oddities like me. _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
