Barcodes Scanners

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Barcodes Scanners

by Ed Roche :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

Good Morning All

 

I have an issue/curious question. Is there a difference in barcode format “Code 39 Mod 10” and normal “Code 39”? The reason I ask is because by mistake we created half of our barcodes in Code 39 format and the rest in Code 39 Mod 10 format. The weird part is the scanner is reading both and entering the correct value for each but when you submit the Code 39 Mod 10 it says it can’t find the barcode but if you scan the Code 39 barcode it works fine.

 

Any ideas?

 

Thanks

Ed

 

Edward J. Roche, MCP

Network Administrator

Solanco School District

717.786.2151 x2437

 

 

"At the End of the Day, Did You Play to Win or Not to Lose?"

 

                   

 

 


_______________________________________________
Koha mailing list
Koha@...
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

Re: Barcodes Scanners

by Chris Nighswonger :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Ed,

2009/11/3 Roche III, Edward <edward_roche@...>:
> Good Morning All
>
>
>
> I have an issue/curious question. Is there a difference in barcode format
> “Code 39 Mod 10” and normal “Code 39”?

Code 39 Mod 10 includes a Mod 10 checksum and so is different. Code 39
is known as a "self-checking" format and so really does not need a
checksum.

>The weird part is the scanner is reading both and
> entering the correct value for each but when you submit the Code 39 Mod 10
> it says it can’t find the barcode but if you scan the Code 39 barcode it
> works fine.

I'm guessing a little here, but you probably have to setup your
scanner for Code 39 Mod 10 in order to get the checksum digit decoded
properly.

Personally, I think I'd whip up a script to change the Code 39 Mod 10
barcodes to plain Code 39.

Kind Regards,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Koha mailing list
Koha@...
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

Re: Barcodes Scanners

by Ed Roche :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi Eric

I emailed the manufacture of the scanner and they confirmed that the Mod 10 uses the checksum character and that I can configure it to ignore the this character but for some reason when I do this now it won't read the regular Code 39 or the Mod 10 barcodes. Have you seen this happen before?

Thanks!
Ed

Edward J. Roche
Network Administrator
Solanco School District
717.786.2151 x2437

"At the End of the Day, Did You Play to Win or Not to Lose?"
     

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Nighswonger [mailto:cnighswonger@...]
Sent: Tuesday, November 03, 2009 11:43 AM
To: Roche III, Edward
Cc: koha@...
Subject: Re: [Koha] Barcodes Scanners

Hi Ed,

2009/11/3 Roche III, Edward <edward_roche@...>:
> Good Morning All
>
>
>
> I have an issue/curious question. Is there a difference in barcode format
> “Code 39 Mod 10” and normal “Code 39”?

Code 39 Mod 10 includes a Mod 10 checksum and so is different. Code 39
is known as a "self-checking" format and so really does not need a
checksum.

>The weird part is the scanner is reading both and
> entering the correct value for each but when you submit the Code 39 Mod 10
> it says it can’t find the barcode but if you scan the Code 39 barcode it
> works fine.

I'm guessing a little here, but you probably have to setup your
scanner for Code 39 Mod 10 in order to get the checksum digit decoded
properly.

Personally, I think I'd whip up a script to change the Code 39 Mod 10
barcodes to plain Code 39.

Kind Regards,
Chris
_______________________________________________
Koha mailing list
Koha@...
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha