|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Blocked JMS tests in 2.xHi, I am trying to understand the state of JMS in 2.x. Several transaction related tests are excluded - what is the associated JIRA issue? If there is no JIRA, can someone please describe the problem - is it config related? I've also asked for more info on issues 2065, 2071 and the related blocker 2011, in the issues themselves. Finally, if anyone knows of issues related to these (excluded) tests in 2.x, I would appreciate knowing what they are: org.mule.providers.jms.functional.MultipleJmsConnectorsTestCase org.mule.providers.jms.functional.ActiveMQJmsTopicFunctionalTestCase org.mule.providers.jms.functional.ActiveMQJmsQueueFunctionalTestCase Thanks, Andrew --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Blocked JMS tests in 2.xAndrew,
I'll delete this tests in the near future,
I rewrote test for ActimeMQ (single tx) and topics
also test for MultipleJms connector exists I'm rewriting the tests for XA transaction, but there is a need to add support for resume/suspend operation
On 10/19/07, andrew cooke <acooke@...> wrote:
-- Best regards, Anatoli Kuzmin |
|
|
Re: Blocked JMS tests in 2.x> Andrew,
> > I'll delete this tests in the near future, > I rewrote test for ActimeMQ (single tx) and topics > also test for MultipleJms connector exists > > I'm rewriting the tests for XA transaction, but there is a need to add > support for resume/suspend operation Thanks for the reply (I am asking about this because we had a review of 2.x and none of us understood what was happening with JMS - there's no real problem, I'm just trying to collect information.). So you will replace all these tests, and already have better tests working elsewhere? Can you estimate when this will be done? If you are changing tests so that they use configuration files then you may have problems with definition parsers etc - I think JMS is going to be the hardest transport to configure. Is there any way I can help? Maybe the best thing to do is make the configuration very simple at first and then, once the tests are working, give me the job of improving the configuration? Thanks, Andrew > On 10/19/07, andrew cooke <acooke@...> wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I am trying to understand the state of JMS in 2.x. Several transaction >> related tests are excluded - what is the associated JIRA issue? If >> there >> is no JIRA, can someone please describe the problem - is it config >> related? >> >> I've also asked for more info on issues 2065, 2071 and the related >> blocker >> 2011, in the issues themselves. >> >> Finally, if anyone knows of issues related to these (excluded) tests in >> 2.x, I would appreciate knowing what they are: >> org.mule.providers.jms.functional.MultipleJmsConnectorsTestCase >> org.mule.providers.jms.functional.ActiveMQJmsTopicFunctionalTestCase >> org.mule.providers.jms.functional.ActiveMQJmsQueueFunctionalTestCase >> >> Thanks, >> Andrew >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> > > > -- > Best regards, > Anatoli Kuzmin > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email |
|
|
Re: Blocked JMS tests in 2.xAndrew,
I have some tests for XA and jms in different places but 1. I'm waiting "resume/suspend" I can't do some test cases without this action 2. Only recently сritical bugs with jms and tx have been fixed On 10/22/07, andrew cooke <acooke@...> wrote: > Andrew, -- Best regards, Anatoli Kuzmin |
|
|
Re: Blocked JMS tests in 2.xAnatoli,
Who is dealing with suspend/resume functionality? Cheers, Ross Mason MuleSource Malta Tel: +356 99 575067 UK Tel: +44 20 8133 3118 US Tel: +1 415 315 9511 On 22 Oct 2007, at 22:43, Anatoli Kuzmin wrote: Andrew, |
|
|
Re: Blocked JMS tests in 2.xAndrew On 10/22/07,
Ross Mason <themuleman@...> wrote:
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |