|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Brahmoism's Jewish origins
by Rahul Dev Sharma
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debendranath_Tagore DebendraNath's Brahmoism is founded on Ram Mohan Roy<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ram_Mohan_Roy>'s Hasidic <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasidic> religious panentheism<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism>(ie. the omnipresence of God <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God>) but extended by Tagore to communion between God and man ie. *Devekus <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devekut>*. *Deveikus* (communion) refers to the belief that an unbroken intercourse takes place between the world of God and the world of humanity. It is true not only that the Deity influences the acts of man, but also that man exerts an influence on the will of the Deity. Every act and word of man produces a corresponding vibration in the upper spheres. From this conception is derived the chief practical principle of Hasidism — communion with God for the purpose of uniting with the source of life and of influencing it. This communion is achieved through the concentration of all thoughts on God, and consulting Him in all the affairs of life. The righteous man is in constant communion with God, even in his worldly affairs, since here also he feels His presence. A special form of communion with God is prayer. In order to render this communion complete the prayer must be full of fervor, ecstatic; and the soul of him who prays must during his devotions detach itself from its material dwelling. |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Brahmoism's Jewish origins
by Rahul Dev Sharma
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Actually I would have thought the fundamental division to be the
"There is truth in all religions" versus "All religions are true" schism. On 11/2/08, jagannath chatterjee <jagannath.chatterjee@...> wrote: > > Panentheism is a keystone in the foundations of True Brahmoism. The > conception of God being both "immanent" and "transcendant" is difficult for > our non-True brothers (Sadharan or NB) to accept and where we part ways > with them and make it impossible to reconcile doctrines. > |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Re: Brahmoism's Jewish origins
by Rahul Dev Sharma
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Before dissecting principles of faith of other religions, we should be clear
on principles of our own faith and the subtle variations. *For example on "God".* Adi Dharma: There is only One "Supreme Spirit", Author and Preserver of Existence. (... Beyond description, immanent, transcendant, eternal, formless, infinite, powerful, radiant, loving, light in the darkness, ruling principle of existence .... ) Brahmo Dharma : There is always Infinite (limitless, undefinable, unperceivable, indivisible) Singularity - immanent and transcendant Singular Author and Preserver of Existence - He who is manifest everywhere and in everything, in the fire and in the water, in the smallest plant to the mightiest oak. *Another example, on prophets, revelations* Adi Dharma: There is no scripture, revelation, creation, prophet, priest or teacher to be revered. (Only the Supreme Spirit of Existence can be revered - not the Vedas, Granths, Bibles or Quran etc.. Worship consist of revering the "inner light within" ie. enlightened conscience) Brahmo Dharma: Respect all creations and beings but never venerate (worship) them for only Singularity can be loved (adored, worshipped). Brahmos reject scripture as authority. Brahmos reject revelations, prophets, gurus, messiahs, or avatars as authority. Brahmos reject the need for formal rituals, priests or places (church, temple, mosque) for worship. * So whereas these appear to be saying the same thing, there are still "irreconciable" differences* On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Saurav Brahmo <saurav@...> wrote: > > "All religions are true" does not constitute Brahmoism as we know it. That is New Dispensation propaganda > based on Keshab's concoctions, and we all know that Keshab was not a Brahmo. > > As this series is on Judaism we could begin with the general articles of faith of that religion as settled by > Maimonides. > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |