Bug#548642: transition: liblo

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Bug#548642: transition: liblo

by Felipe Sateler :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@...
Usertags: transition

New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
with the old one.

Direct reverse dependencies:

ardour
csound
dssi
fluidsynth-dssi
freej
hexter
jamin
ll-scope
nekobee
qtractor
rosegarden*
sineshaper*
whysynth
wsynth-dssi
xsynth-dssi



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-REQUEST@...
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@...


Bug#548642: transition: liblo

by Felipe Sateler :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@...
> Usertags: transition
>
> New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
> this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
> liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
> However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
> liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
> NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
> should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
> with the old one.
Ping?

>
> Direct reverse dependencies:
>
> ardour
> csound
> dssi
> fluidsynth-dssi
> freej
> hexter
> jamin
> ll-scope
> nekobee
> qtractor
> rosegarden*
> sineshaper*
> whysynth
> wsynth-dssi
> xsynth-dssi
>
>
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: squeeze/sid
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
>
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler


signature.asc (853 bytes) Download Attachment

Bug#548642: transition: liblo

by Felipe Sateler :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:40 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:

> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@...
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
> > this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
> > liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
> > However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
> > liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
> > NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
> > should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
> > with the old one.
>
> Ping?
Again? Someone in here?


--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler


signature.asc (853 bytes) Download Attachment