Your message dated Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:00:00 +0100
with message-id <
20091110085959.GA8526@...>
and subject line Re: Bug#555512: linux-libc-dev: Querying Debian BTS for reports on linux-2.6 (source)...
has caused the Debian Bug report #555512,
regarding linux-libc-dev: Querying Debian BTS for reports on linux-2.6 (source)...
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact
owner@...
immediately.)
--
555512:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=555512Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
owner@... with problems
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 2.6.30-8
Severity: important
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31.5-netxx01
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-- no debconf information
timex.h is missing:
#define MOD_NANO ADJ_NANO
This breaks ntp. (I have submitted a workaround patch to the ntp
maintainers, but the bug is really in the kernel headers/this package.)
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:53:26PM -0500, Christopher Hoover wrote:
> timex.h is missing:
> #define MOD_NANO ADJ_NANO
> This breaks ntp. (I have submitted a workaround patch to the ntp
> maintainers, but the bug is really in the kernel headers/this package.)
No. The MOD_* defines are already described as compatibility names. The
mentioned name was added since Lenny, so it does not fall into any
backward compatibility class. If you think this is a bug, please discuss
it with Linux upstream, I don't see one, closing.
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
