|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Bug-buddy-emails and accountsCurrently when a bug-buddy email is submitted and the user does _not_
have a bugzilla.gnome.org account we: * asssign the bug to unknown@... * set a field in the bugs table to the real reporter When this happens a weird comment is added telling other readers than the bug has been reassigned. This makes a reading think that the reporter doesn't receive the bugmail anymore. In practice they still do. For 2.20 I want responses to emails to automatically add the comment to the bug. There is a script for this that only needs some configuring (+procmail). That script only works for persons with a *valid* Bugzilla account. Persons not having a Bugzilla account and just used bug-buddy will more likely: - Not know about Bugzilla - Reply to every email transmitted to them However, even with the add-comment-to-bug script this will still fail. This can be solved in two ways: 1. If the user can't be found, add the comment as unknown@... and include some text specifying the real submitter 2. Create normal Bugzilla accounts for bug-buddy emails Option 1 is a hack upon a hack. I like option 2 more. Just mail the password + instructions to them when the account has been created for the first time. When they finally use that password and login, they will actually be the reporter of the bugs they submitted (and have more privileges). Perhaps I could also do this for the existing accounts. Thoughts? -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ bugzilla-devel-list mailing list bugzilla-devel-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-devel-list |
|
|
Re: Bug-buddy-emails and accountsOn 7/26/05, Olav Vitters <olav@...> wrote:
> Currently when a bug-buddy email is submitted and the user does _not_ > have a bugzilla.gnome.org account we: > * asssign the bug to unknown@... > * set a field in the bugs table to the real reporter > > When this happens a weird comment is added telling other readers than > the bug has been reassigned. This makes a reading think that the > reporter doesn't receive the bugmail anymore. In practice they still do. > > For 2.20 I want responses to emails to automatically add the comment to > the bug. There is a script for this that only needs some configuring > (+procmail). That script only works for persons with a *valid* Bugzilla > account. Sweet, sounds great. We'll need to check for "Out of Office auto-reply" messages, though, and respond with a big automated larting. > Persons not having a Bugzilla account and just used bug-buddy will more > likely: > - Not know about Bugzilla > - Reply to every email transmitted to them > > However, even with the add-comment-to-bug script this will still fail. > This can be solved in two ways: > 1. If the user can't be found, add the comment as unknown@... > and include some text specifying the real submitter > 2. Create normal Bugzilla accounts for bug-buddy emails > > Option 1 is a hack upon a hack. I like option 2 more. Just mail the > password + instructions to them when the account has been created for > the first time. When they finally use that password and login, they will > actually be the reporter of the bugs they submitted (and have more > privileges). > Perhaps I could also do this for the existing accounts. > > Thoughts? *shrug* I don't have any preferences between the two. Luis, others? _______________________________________________ bugzilla-devel-list mailing list bugzilla-devel-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-devel-list |
|
|
Re: Bug-buddy-emails and accountsOn 7/26/05, Elijah Newren <newren@...> wrote:
> On 7/26/05, Olav Vitters <olav@...> wrote: > > Currently when a bug-buddy email is submitted and the user does _not_ > > have a bugzilla.gnome.org account we: > > * asssign the bug to unknown@... > > * set a field in the bugs table to the real reporter > > > > When this happens a weird comment is added telling other readers than > > the bug has been reassigned. This makes a reading think that the > > reporter doesn't receive the bugmail anymore. In practice they still do. > > > > For 2.20 I want responses to emails to automatically add the comment to > > the bug. There is a script for this that only needs some configuring > > (+procmail). That script only works for persons with a *valid* Bugzilla > > account. > > Sweet, sounds great. We'll need to check for "Out of Office > auto-reply" messages, though, and respond with a big automated > larting. > > > Persons not having a Bugzilla account and just used bug-buddy will more > > likely: > > - Not know about Bugzilla > > - Reply to every email transmitted to them > > > > However, even with the add-comment-to-bug script this will still fail. > > This can be solved in two ways: > > 1. If the user can't be found, add the comment as unknown@... > > and include some text specifying the real submitter > > 2. Create normal Bugzilla accounts for bug-buddy emails > > > > Option 1 is a hack upon a hack. I like option 2 more. Just mail the > > password + instructions to them when the account has been created for > > the first time. When they finally use that password and login, they will > > actually be the reporter of the bugs they submitted (and have more > > privileges). > > Perhaps I could also do this for the existing accounts. > > > > Thoughts? > > *shrug* I don't have any preferences between the two. Luis, others? I prefer #2, though I know it'll give us a lot of junk accounts. Can't see any other real downside. If we wanted to get fancy, if the account creation email bounces, we can add a note to the bug and point out that the creator is unlikely to respond :) Luis _______________________________________________ bugzilla-devel-list mailing list bugzilla-devel-list@... http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/bugzilla-devel-list |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |