Bug tracker?

[David MacIver]

So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
idea to fix this.

[Christos KK Loverdos]

No, it is not a good idea. It is a must.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:01 AM, David MacIver <david.maciver@...> wrote:

So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
idea to fix this.

--
__~O
-\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
(*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com

[Christos KK Loverdos]

By the way, anyone considering the pros and cons of my previous (another thread) idea for breaking up the code base to maven sub-projects?

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Christos KK Loverdos <loverdos@...> wrote:

No, it is not a good idea. It is a must.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:01 AM, David MacIver <david.maciver@...> wrote:

So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
idea to fix this.

--
__~O
-\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
(*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com

--
__~O
-\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
(*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com

[David MacIver]

I'm british. We're not bad at understatement.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Christos KK Loverdos
<loverdos@...> wrote:

> No, it is not a good idea. It is a must.
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:01 AM, David MacIver <david.maciver@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
>> idea to fix this.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> __~O
> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>

[David MacIver]

I think it's a good idea, as much as I hate maven. :-)

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Christos KK Loverdos
<loverdos@...> wrote:

> By the way, anyone considering the pros and cons of my previous (another
> thread) idea for breaking up the code base to maven sub-projects?
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Christos KK Loverdos <loverdos@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> No, it is not a good idea. It is a must.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:01 AM, David MacIver <david.maciver@...>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
>>> idea to fix this.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> __~O
>> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
>> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>
>
>
> --
> __~O
> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>

[Andrew.Foggin]

I'll echo both those sentiments :-)

David MacIver wrote:

> I think it's a good idea, as much as I hate maven. :-)
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Christos KK Loverdos
> <loverdos@...> wrote:
>  
>> By the way, anyone considering the pros and cons of my previous (another
>> thread) idea for breaking up the code base to maven sub-projects?
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Christos KK Loverdos <loverdos@...>
>> wrote:
>>    
>>> No, it is not a good idea. It is a must.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:01 AM, David MacIver <david.maciver@...>
>>> wrote:
>>>      
>>>> So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
>>>> idea to fix this.
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>
>>> --
>>> __~O
>>> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
>>> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>>>      
>>
>> --
>> __~O
>> -\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
>> (*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com
>>
>>    
>
>
>  

[Jamie Webb-2]

On 2008-08-21 23:01:33 David MacIver wrote:
> So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
> idea to fix this.

Seems like overkill to me. I don't see the mailing list overflowing
with forgotten bug reports so far.

/J

[Christos KK Loverdos]

Probably it is not a matter of bug report volume, but of a way to have things organized better.
A (dummy) google project could be a good idea, just for exploiting google's infrastructure to keep issues somewhere. This gives us just zero administration effort.

On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Jamie Webb <j@...> wrote:

On 2008-08-21 23:01:33 David MacIver wrote:
> So, I just noticed that scalax doesn't have one. It might be a good
> idea to fix this.

Seems like overkill to me. I don't see the mailing list overflowing
with forgotten bug reports so far.

/J

--
__~O
-\ <, Christos KK Loverdos
(*)/ (*) http://ckkloverdos.com