Bugsquad 2009-08-03 meeting minutes

[Susana Pereira]

Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
with the irc logs at http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/Bugsquad


==== Old untouched bugs ====

* What they are and how to close them

DISCUSSED: Bugs with more than 1 year without any activity (excluding
enhancement requests) -> set NEEDINFO state -> 6 weeks without
response -> close as INCOMPLETE

ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for this case. He
will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond before the bug
being closed.



==== NEEDINFO bugs ====

* how long before closing them as INCOMPLETE

DISCUSSED: 6 weeks



==== Use of the NEW status ====

* use NEW for TRIAGED instead of CONFIRMED
* PROS: easier triage, reporters don't feel like nobody takes care of
their issue
* CONS: some developers don't like it when triagers set their bugs to NEW

DISCUSSED: No changes (NEW=CONFIRMED)



==== Should we use NOTABUG resolution ====

* how to deal with suggestion requests
* brainstorm.gnome.org is not a good idea for GNOME
* keep NOTABUG resolution current use

DISCUSSED: no changes



==== Discuss the severity and priority fields ====

* kill priority field? (a bit confusing for novices, is really useful?)
* some developers use these fields to better organize their bugs

DISCUSSED: no changes



==== Kill VERIFIED and CLOSED status ====

* a developer closes as FIXED, a reporter then closes as VERIFIED, a
product manager then closes as CLOSED
* not frequently used in GNOME

DISCUSSED: no changes

ACTION: AndreKlapper and JavierJardon will update stock responses to
ask reporters to verify the fix after it has landed in distribution.



==== What to do with bugs about deprecated modules? ====

DISCUSSED:

1) Talk to maintainer first and get agreement (CC bugsquad list)
2) Add a warning comment that module is now deprecated and to please
check against potential new module and set status to NEEDINFO
3) Otherwise close 6 weeks later if untouched, set flag
obsolete-module-2009 or something else


ACTIONS:
- SusanaPereira contact debian-gnome
- SusanaPereira upgrade list of deprecated modules in bugzilla
- JavierJardon make a table with deprecated modules and their
maintainers. See http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules and
http://live.gnome.org/ThomasAndersen/CvsCleanup
- AndreKlapper make a "stock email" to contact maintainers



==== Next Meeting ====

* Next meeting will be in September (one month from now)

ACTION: TobiasMueller set a new date for next meeting using doodle



Cheers,

Susana Pereira
_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Andre Klapper]

Proposals inline, comments & proofreading by someone having English as
mothertongue welcome.


Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 01:34 +0100 schrieb Susana Pereira:
> Here are the minutes of the meeting.

Thanks for coming up with them, Susana!


> ==== Old untouched bugs ====
> ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for this case. He
> will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond before the bug
> being closed.

Proposal for stock answer 'old_untouched' that needs to be added to
bugzilla-newer/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl:

>>
This bug was reported against a version that is not supported anymore
nowadays. Developers are no longer working on this version so there will
not be any bug fixes for this version.
Can you please check again if the issue you reported here still happens
in a recent version of GNOME and update this report by adding a comment
and adjusting the \'Version\' field?

Again thank you for reporting this and sorry that it could not be fixed
for the version you originally used here.

Without feedback this report will be closed as INCOMPLETE after 6 weeks.
<<

Note that http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/StockResponses
needs an update after getting this live.


> ==== Kill VERIFIED and CLOSED status ====
> ACTION: AndreKlapper and JavierJardon will update stock responses to
> ask reporters to verify the fix after it has landed in distribution.

Proposal for adding additional sentence to stock answers 'dupe+fixed',
'fixed_in_stable', 'fixed_in_head' in
bugzilla-newer/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl:

>>
After your distribution has provided the updated package to you and if
you have some time, please feel encouraged to verify the fix by marking
this bug report as VERIFIED.
<<


> ==== What to do with bugs about deprecated modules? ====
> ACTIONS:
> - AndreKlapper make a "stock email" to contact maintainers

Proposal:

>>
Hi,

according to the AUTHORS/MAINTAINERS file in GIT you maintain the module
mentioned in the subject line.
This module has not seen any updates for a long time.

Please respond to this email and inform the GNOME Bugsquad if your
project is still maintained or if it is realistically speaking dead.
If it is dead the GNOME Bugsquad is going to close the remaining open
bug reports and enhancement requests in GNOME Bugzilla and inform the
bug reporters about it. (If you instead prefer to do this yourself, just
say so.)

You can access your module bug statistics by visiting
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi and then choosing the module name
from the "Browse:" dropdown menu.
<<


-andre
--
 mailto:ak-47@... | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Javier Jardón]

2009/8/4 Susana Pereira <susana.pereira@...>:
> Here are the minutes of the meeting. They can also be found online
> with the irc logs at http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/Bugsquad
>

Hello all,

Sorry, I've moved all the content to [1]
Also, I've created a new page [2] to organize future meetings


Regards,

[1] http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/Meetings/20090903
[2] http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/Meetings
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Philip Withnall-2]

On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 17:19 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> Proposals inline, comments & proofreading by someone having English as
> mothertongue welcome.

Comments/Improvements inline.

>
> Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 01:34 +0100 schrieb Susana Pereira:
> > Here are the minutes of the meeting.
>
> Thanks for coming up with them, Susana!
>
>
> > ==== Old untouched bugs ====
> > ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for this case. He
> > will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond before the bug
> > being closed.
>
> Proposal for stock answer 'old_untouched' that needs to be added to
> bugzilla-newer/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl:
>
> >>
> This bug was reported against a version that is not supported anymore
> nowadays. Developers are no longer working on this version so there will
> not be any bug fixes for this version.
> Can you please check again if the issue you reported here still happens
> in a recent version of GNOME and update this report by adding a comment
> and adjusting the \'Version\' field?
>
> Again thank you for reporting this and sorry that it could not be fixed
> for the version you originally used here.
>
> Without feedback this report will be closed as INCOMPLETE after 6 weeks.
> <<

This bug was reported against a version which is not supported any more.
Developers are no longer working on this version so there will not be
any bug fixes for it.
...

> Note that http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/StockResponses
> needs an update after getting this live.
>
>
> > ==== Kill VERIFIED and CLOSED status ====
> > ACTION: AndreKlapper and JavierJardon will update stock responses to
> > ask reporters to verify the fix after it has landed in distribution.
>
> Proposal for adding additional sentence to stock answers 'dupe+fixed',
> 'fixed_in_stable', 'fixed_in_head' in
> bugzilla-newer/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl:
>
> >>
> After your distribution has provided the updated package to you and if
> you have some time, please feel encouraged to verify the fix by marking
> this bug report as VERIFIED.
> <<

After your distribution has provided you with the updated package – and
if you have some time – please feel encouraged to verify the fix by
marking this report as VERIFIED.
If the updated package does not fix the issue, please re-open this bug
report.

> > ==== What to do with bugs about deprecated modules? ====
> > ACTIONS:
> > - AndreKlapper make a "stock email" to contact maintainers
>
> Proposal:
>
> >>
> Hi,
>
> according to the AUTHORS/MAINTAINERS file in GIT you maintain the module
> mentioned in the subject line.
> This module has not seen any updates for a long time.

According to the AUTHORS/MAINTAINERS file in git, you maintain the
module mentioned in the subject line. This module has not seen any
updates for a long time.

Andre: By "updates", do we mean "releases" or "commits"? It might be an
idea to clarify in the e-mail.

> Please respond to this email and inform the GNOME Bugsquad if your
> project is still maintained or if it is realistically speaking dead.
> If it is dead the GNOME Bugsquad is going to close the remaining open
> bug reports and enhancement requests in GNOME Bugzilla and inform the
> bug reporters about it. (If you instead prefer to do this yourself, just
> say so.)

Please respond to this e-mail and inform the GNOME Bugsquad if your
project is still maintained or if it is, realistically speaking, dead.
...

Andre: Do we want to mention a deadline for replying to the e-mail, and
say that if the maintainers don't reply by that date then it'll be
assumed their module is dead?

Regards,
Philip

> You can access your module bug statistics by visiting
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi and then choosing the module name
> from the "Browse:" dropdown menu.
> <<
>
>
> -andre


_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Leo Albert Jackson Jr]

Andre,

I volunteer to help in this if you need. Proof reading and any where else.

Reagrds,

Leo Albert Jackson Jr
lajjr

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Leo Albert Jackson Jr]

Andre,


great idea +1

--- On Tue, 8/4/09, Andre Klapper <ak-47@...> wrote:

> From: Andre Klapper <ak-47@...>
> Subject: Re: Bugsquad 2009-08-03 meeting minutes
> To: gnome-bugsquad@...
> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 11:19 AM
> Proposals inline, comments &
> proofreading by someone having English as
> mothertongue welcome.
>
>
> Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 01:34 +0100 schrieb Susana
> Pereira:
> > Here are the minutes of the meeting.
>
> Thanks for coming up with them, Susana!
>
>
> > ==== Old untouched bugs ====
> > ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for
> this case. He
> > will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond
> before the bug
> > being closed.
>
> Proposal for stock answer 'old_untouched' that needs to be
> added to
> bugzilla-newer/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl:
>
> >>
> This bug was reported against a version that is not
> supported anymore
> nowadays. Developers are no longer working on this version
> so there will
> not be any bug fixes for this version.
> Can you please check again if the issue you reported here
> still happens
> in a recent version of GNOME and update this report by
> adding a comment
> and adjusting the \'Version\' field?
>
> Again thank you for reporting this and sorry that it could
> not be fixed
> for the version you originally used here.
>
> Without feedback this report will be closed as INCOMPLETE
> after 6 weeks.
> <<
>
> Note that http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/StockResponses
> needs an update after getting this live.
>
>
> > ==== Kill VERIFIED and CLOSED status ====
> > ACTION: AndreKlapper and JavierJardon will update
> stock responses to
> > ask reporters to verify the fix after it has landed in
> distribution.
>
> Proposal for adding additional sentence to stock answers
> 'dupe+fixed',
> 'fixed_in_stable', 'fixed_in_head' in
> bugzilla-newer/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl:
>
> >>
> After your distribution has provided the updated package to
> you and if
> you have some time, please feel encouraged to verify the
> fix by marking
> this bug report as VERIFIED.
> <<
>
>
> > ==== What to do with bugs about deprecated modules?
> ====
> > ACTIONS:
> > - AndreKlapper make a "stock email" to contact
> maintainers
>
> Proposal:
>
> >>
> Hi,
>
> according to the AUTHORS/MAINTAINERS file in GIT you
> maintain the module
> mentioned in the subject line.
> This module has not seen any updates for a long time.
>
> Please respond to this email and inform the GNOME Bugsquad
> if your
> project is still maintained or if it is realistically
> speaking dead.
> If it is dead the GNOME Bugsquad is going to close the
> remaining open
> bug reports and enhancement requests in GNOME Bugzilla and
> inform the
> bug reporters about it. (If you instead prefer to do this
> yourself, just
> say so.)
>
> You can access your module bug statistics by visiting
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi and
> then choosing the module name
> from the "Browse:" dropdown menu.

Leo Albert Jackson Jr
lajjr
_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Tobias Mueller-3]

Hey Javier :)

On 04.08.2009 18:41, Javier Jardón wrote:
> Sorry, I've moved all the content to http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/Meetings/20090903
Thanks, I feel it's better placed there. But it should be 2009-08-03,
i.e. not 2009-09-03, right? ;-)

(I can't check or move the page due to weird connectivity)

Cheers,
  Tobi

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Javier Jardón]

El 7 de agosto de 2009 21:55, Tobias
Mueller<muelli@...> escribió:
> Hey Javier :)
>

Hey Tobias ;)

> On 04.08.2009 18:41, Javier Jardón wrote:
>> Sorry, I've moved all the content to http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/Meetings/20090903
> Thanks, I feel it's better placed there. But it should be 2009-08-03,
> i.e. not 2009-09-03, right? ;-)
>

Ooops, I just change the page right now, thanks for the warning ;)

> Cheers,
>  Tobi

Regards,
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Javier Jardón]

Hello bugsquaders! ;)

here a little update about the actions that we decided in the latest meeting:

> ==== Old untouched bugs ====
>
> ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for this case. He
> will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond before the bug
> being closed.

DONE: patch waiting in bubzilla, see [1].

> ==== Kill VERIFIED and CLOSED status ====
>
> ACTION: AndreKlapper and JavierJardon will update stock responses to
> ask reporters to verify the fix after it has landed in distribution.

DONE: patch waiting in bugzilla, see [2].

> ==== What to do with bugs about deprecated modules? ====
>
> ACTIONS:
> - SusanaPereira contact debian-gnome
> - SusanaPereira upgrade list of deprecated modules in bugzilla

NOT DONE?

> - JavierJardon make a table with deprecated modules and their
> maintainers. See http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules and
> http://live.gnome.org/ThomasAndersen/CvsCleanup

IN PROGRESS, see [3]

> - AndreKlapper make a "stock email" to contact maintainers.

IN PROGRESS, see [3] bottom page.

"By "updates", do we mean "releases" or "commits"? It might be an idea
to clarify in the e-mail."

+1 for commits here.



> ==== Next Meeting ====
>
> ACTION: TobiasMueller set a new date for next meeting using doodle

NOT DONE?


This is all, thank Andre for the texts and Philip Withnall for the reviews ;)

Best regards,

[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590840
[2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591222
[3] http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules
--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Andre Klapper]

Hi,

Am Sonntag, den 09.08.2009, 13:34 +0200 schrieb Javier Jardón:
> > ==== Old untouched bugs ====
> >
> > ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for this case. He
> > will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond before the bug
> > being closed.
>
> DONE: patch waiting in bubzilla, see [1].

I think we should mention this in the TriageGuide too.

> "By "updates", do we mean "releases" or "commits"? It might be an idea
> to clarify in the e-mail."

I'd prefer commits.

andre
--
 mailto:ak-47@... | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Andre Klapper]

Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 17:50 +0100 schrieb Philip Withnall:
> Andre: By "updates", do we mean "releases" or "commits"? It might be an
> idea to clarify in the e-mail.

I'd go with commits here.

> Andre: Do we want to mention a deadline for replying to the e-mail, and
> say that if the maintainers don't reply by that date then it'll be
> assumed their module is dead?

Hmm. I think I was initially against this. E-mail is quite error-prone.
But a "Please do respond within the next four weeks." should be fine.
After that I'd probably try again and then close tickets.

andre
--
 mailto:ak-47@... | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Leo Albert Jackson Jr]

Andre,

Yes a dead line is needed +1
Regards,

Leo Albert Jackson Jr
lajjr

--- On Sun, 8/9/09, Andre Klapper <ak-47@...> wrote:

> From: Andre Klapper <ak-47@...>
> Subject: Re: Bugsquad 2009-08-03 meeting minutes
> To: gnome-bugsquad@...
> Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 5:06 PM
> Am Dienstag, den 04.08.2009, 17:50
> +0100 schrieb Philip Withnall:
> > Andre: By "updates", do we mean "releases" or
> "commits"? It might be an
> > idea to clarify in the e-mail.
>
> I'd go with commits here.
>
> > Andre: Do we want to mention a deadline for replying
> to the e-mail, and
> > say that if the maintainers don't reply by that date
> then it'll be
> > assumed their module is dead?
>
> Hmm. I think I was initially against this. E-mail is quite
> error-prone.
> But a "Please do respond within the next four weeks."
> should be fine.
> After that I'd probably try again and then close tickets.
>
> andre
> --
>  mailto:ak-47@... |
> failed
>  http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
> Gnome-bugsquad@...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
>

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Tobias Mueller-3]

Hey Hey :)

Andre Klapper wrote:
>> ==== Old untouched bugs ====
>> ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for this case. He
>> will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond before the bug
>> being closed.
>
> Proposal for stock answer 'old_untouched'
I like that.
Maybe we can add a keyword to the bug, so that we can search for these
NEEDINFO bugs (i.e. old_untouched)?

> that needs to be added to
> bugzilla-newer/template/en/default/bug/edit.html.tmpl:
>
Can you sync your response to git?

Also we have new TODOs, right?
  * Mention Stock Response in
    http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide/StockResponses
  * Also mention to set untouched bugs to NEEDINFO in
    http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/TriageGuide

If anyone want to take the bullet, feel free to do so. I've added that
to the agenda for the next meeting¹ so that we'll hopefully distribute
these tasks there ;-)


Cheers,
   Tobi

¹ http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/Meetings/20090903



_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Tobias Mueller-3]

Hey :)

Javier Jardón wrote:
> here a little update about the actions that we decided in the latest meeting:
>> ==== Next Meeting ====
>>
>> ACTION: TobiasMueller set a new date for next meeting using doodle
>
> NOT DONE?
>
Done :)

Cheers,
   Tobi



_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Tobias Mueller-3]

Hey,

Tobias Mueller wrote:
> Can you sync your response to git?
>
Sorry for the noise. I haven't read the whole thread properly. I have
just seen that there's a bug for that.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591222


Cheers,
   Tobi



_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Susana Pereira]

Hello,

2009/8/9 Javier Jardón <javierjc1982@...>:
>
>
>> ==== What to do with bugs about deprecated modules? ====
>>
>> ACTIONS:
>> - SusanaPereira contact debian-gnome

Here is my proposal for the email (to be sent after the products have
officially been considered obsolete):

----------
To: debian-gtk-gnome@...

Dear downstream,

The GNOME products:
- <list of products here>

are now considered obsolete and unmaintained in GNOME and we are about
to close all bugs from these products in GNOME bugzilla[1]. If you are
still interested in the information these reports may contain, please
copy the information you need now or you can find the information
later by searching for CLOSED bugs and keyword obsolete-module-<year>.

Please don't hesitate to contact the GNOME Bugsquad
(gnome-bugsquad@...) if you have any questions. Also, please let
us know if you do not wish to receive these emails in the future.

[1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/

--------------------


>> - SusanaPereira upgrade list of deprecated modules in bugzilla
>

NOT DONE

enter_bug.cgi groups products by their classification. I think that
Bugzilla provides a page for doing that here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/editproducts.cgi but I can't access it.

I'll report a bug about this as soon as the new bugzilla installation
is set up. I can still come up with an sql update to hammer this in
the BD but it sounds safer that someone with enough permissions does
it in the gui.

Cheers,

Susana

> NOT DONE?
>
>> - JavierJardon make a table with deprecated modules and their
>> maintainers. See http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules and
>> http://live.gnome.org/ThomasAndersen/CvsCleanup
>
> IN PROGRESS, see [3]
>
>> - AndreKlapper make a "stock email" to contact maintainers.
>
> IN PROGRESS, see [3] bottom page.
>
> "By "updates", do we mean "releases" or "commits"? It might be an idea
> to clarify in the e-mail."
>
> +1 for commits here.
>
>
>
>> ==== Next Meeting ====
>>
>> ACTION: TobiasMueller set a new date for next meeting using doodle
>
> NOT DONE?
>
>
> This is all, thank Andre for the texts and Philip Withnall for the reviews ;)
>
> Best regards,
>
> [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590840
> [2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591222
> [3] http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules
> --
> Javier Jardón Cabezas
>

_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
Gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Tobias Mueller-3]

Labas!

Javier Jardón wrote:
>> ==== Old untouched bugs ====
>>
>> ACTION: AndreKlapper will do a new stock response for this case. He
>> will warn the reporter that he has 6 weeks to respond before the bug
>> being closed.
>
> DONE: patch waiting in bubzilla, see [1].
 > [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=591222

>> ==== Kill VERIFIED and CLOSED status ====
>>
>> ACTION: AndreKlapper and JavierJardon will update stock responses to
>> ask reporters to verify the fix after it has landed in distribution.
> DONE: patch waiting in bugzilla, see [2].
>
 > [2] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590840

Well, those are not really done due to the bugzilla upgrade and I don't
think we have stock answers at all yet.
So do we already have an open bug requesting stock answers back? :)
Please comment on bug 591222.

>> - JavierJardon make a table with deprecated modules and their
>> maintainers. See http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules and
>> http://live.gnome.org/ThomasAndersen/CvsCleanup
>
> IN PROGRESS, see [3]
> [3] http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules
What is needed for that to be finished?

>> - AndreKlapper make a "stock email" to contact maintainers.
>
> IN PROGRESS, see [3] bottom page.
>
> "By "updates", do we mean "releases" or "commits"? It might be an idea
> to clarify in the e-mail."
>
> +1 for commits here.
>
+1
Is this finished then?
If I read the thread correctly, you wanted to add a "Please do respond
within the next four weeks.".

Cheers,
   Tobi



_______________________________________________
gnome-bugsquad mailing list
gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Tobias Mueller-6]

Aloha! :)

Susana Pereira wrote:
> 2009/8/9 Javier Jardón <javierjc1982@...>:
>>> ACTIONS:
>>> - SusanaPereira contact debian-gnome
>
> Here is my proposal for the email (to be sent after the products have
> officially been considered obsolete):
>
Looks good to me :) Thanks!

>>> - SusanaPereira upgrade list of deprecated modules in bugzilla
>
> NOT DONE
>
> enter_bug.cgi groups products by their classification. I think that
> Bugzilla provides a page for doing that here:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/editproducts.cgi but I can't access it.
>
> I'll report a bug about this as soon as the new bugzilla installation
> is set up. I can still come up with an sql update to hammer this in
> the BD but it sounds safer that someone with enough permissions does
> it in the gui.
>

Is the list at http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules actually

completed?
Then we could open a new bug requesting the update of the list in bugzilla.

Cheers,
   Tobi



_______________________________________________
gnome-bugsquad mailing list
gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Andre Klapper]

Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 05:24 +0200 schrieb Tobias Mueller:
> Is the list at http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules actually
> completed?

I wrote down some notes for myself a few weeks ago about *potentially*
dead modules. Wanted to investigate myself but not much time, hence
sharing this:


dogtail ?
gnome-volume-manager ?
fast-user-switch-applet ?
atomix has not seen updates for more than two years.
eggcups has not seen any updates for more than two years.
drwright is even deader, as eggcups was its successor.
resapplet hasn't seen any work in the last 2 years.
Coaster: Extremely dead.
firestarter: No updates for four years.
mlview: No updates for four years.
gnome-cups-manager
OnTV looks dead.


andre
--
 mailto:ak-47@... | failed
 http://www.iomc.de/  | http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper

_______________________________________________
gnome-bugsquad mailing list
gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

[Javier Jardón]

2009/9/2 Andre Klapper <ak-47@...>:

> Am Mittwoch, den 02.09.2009, 05:24 +0200 schrieb Tobias Mueller:
>> Is the list at http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules actually
>> completed?
>
> I wrote down some notes for myself a few weeks ago about *potentially*
> dead modules. Wanted to investigate myself but not much time, hence
> sharing this:
>
>
> dogtail ?
> gnome-volume-manager ?
> fast-user-switch-applet ?
> atomix has not seen updates for more than two years.
> eggcups has not seen any updates for more than two years.
> drwright is even deader, as eggcups was its successor.
> resapplet hasn't seen any work in the last 2 years.
> Coaster: Extremely dead.
> firestarter: No updates for four years.
> mlview: No updates for four years.
> gnome-cups-manager
> OnTV looks dead.

Hello,

I've added this list to [1] and after some research:

Most of the previous modules are DEAD or replaced by other. Only
mlview and  OnTV seems to be active.

Regards,


[1] http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DeprecatedModules#head-f38827d2c59d60ddab531156d5ec1abbd01401dd

--
Javier Jardón Cabezas
_______________________________________________
gnome-bugsquad mailing list
gnome-bugsquad@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad