|
»
»
Build issue for 0.9.5 on Redhat 5 (has there been follow up since Aug 09?)
|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Build issue for 0.9.5 on Redhat 5 (has there been follow up since Aug 09?)
by Heidi Schmidt
::
Rate this Message:
Is there a patch now ? or previous version that is known to compile on RH5? If so, I’ll nab either one. Thanks for the bandwidth. Heidi Here is what I found and hope the information helps with a future patch. Notes:
Uname details Linux 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 13:58:24 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux more /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga) rpm -qa | grep binutil binutils-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 file ../../../Desktop/oprofile-0.9.5.tar.gz ../../../Desktop/oprofile-0.9.5.tar.gz: gzip compressed data, from Unix, last modified: Fri Jul 31 13:12:11 2009, max compression md5 ../../../Desktop/oprofile-0.9.5.tar.gz MD5 (../../../Desktop/oprofile-0.9.5.tar.gz) = 4b2ceca3fa013c95cc8d47c790807dc2 ls -ltra ../../../Desktop/oprofile-0.9.5.tar.gz -rw-r--r--@ 1 hschmidt MANHUNT\domain users 1319732 Oct 23 11:41 ../../../Desktop/oprofile-0.9.5.tar.gz processor : 3 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5150 @ 2.66GHz stepping : 6 cpu MHz : 2660.033 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 3 siblings : 2 core id : 1 cpu cores : 2 apicid : 7 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips : 5320.04 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: Output of the configure session ========================== sudo ./configure --with-kernel-support \ > --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu \ > --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu \ > --build=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu \ > --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr \ > --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin \ > --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include \ > --libdir=/usr/lib64 --libexecdir=/usr/libexec \ > --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man \ > --infodir=/usr/share/info Password: checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... gawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-gcc... no checking for gcc... gcc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... none needed checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3 checking whether basename is declared... yes checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-ranlib... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking build system type... x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu checking host system type... x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /bin/sed checking for egrep... grep -E checking for ld used by gcc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-g++... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-c++... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-gpp... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-aCC... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-CC... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-cxx... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-cc++... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-cl... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-FCC... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-KCC... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-RCC... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-xlC_r... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-xlC... no checking for g++... no checking for c++... no checking for gpp... no checking for aCC... no checking for CC... no checking for cxx... no checking for cc++... no checking for cl... no checking for FCC... no checking for KCC... no checking for RCC... no checking for xlC_r... no checking for xlC... no checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no checking whether g++ accepts -g... no checking dependency style of g++... none checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-g77... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-f77... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-xlf... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-frt... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-pgf77... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-fort77... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-fl32... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-af77... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-f90... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-xlf90... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-pgf90... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-epcf90... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-f95... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-fort... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-xlf95... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-ifc... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-efc... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-pgf95... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-lf95... no checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-gfortran... no checking for g77... no checking for f77... no checking for xlf... no checking for frt... no checking for pgf77... no checking for fort77... no checking for fl32... no checking for af77... no checking for f90... no checking for xlf90... no checking for pgf90... no checking for epcf90... no checking for f95... no checking for fort... no checking for xlf95... no checking for ifc... no checking for efc... no checking for pgf95... no checking for lf95... no checking for gfortran... no checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no checking whether accepts -g... no checking the maximum length of command line arguments... 32768 checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok checking for objdir... .libs checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-ar... no checking for ar... ar checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-ranlib... ranlib checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-strip... no checking for strip... strip checking if gcc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if gcc static flag -static works... yes checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the gcc linker (/usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes configure: creating libtool appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for gcc option to accept ANSI C... (cached) none needed checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3 checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu-g++... g++ checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... (cached) no checking whether g++ accepts -g... (cached) no checking dependency style of g++... (cached) none checking for ld... /usr/bin/ld -m elf_x86_64 checking for kernel OProfile support... yes checking whether malloc attribute is understood... no checking whether __builtin_expect is understood... yes checking for sched_setaffinity... yes checking for perfmonctl... no checking for poptGetContext in -lpopt... yes checking libiberty.h usability... yes checking libiberty.h presence... yes checking for libiberty.h... yes checking for cplus_demangle in -liberty... yes checking for xcalloc... yes checking for xmemdup... yes checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes checking for main in -lintl... no checking for bfd_openr in -lbfd... yes checking whether bfd_get_synthetic_symtab() exists in BFD library... no checking for bfd_openr_iovec in -lbfd... yes checking whether bfd_openr_iovec has seven parameters... no checking popt prototype... takes const char ** checking whether to use included sstream... yes checking whether bfd defines bool... yes checking type of size_t... unsigned long checking type of ptrdiff_t... long checking for X... no checking for moc2... not found checking for moc... not found checking for uic... not found checking for Qt library name... failed checking for xsltproc... no checking whether gcc -W is understood... yes checking whether g++ -W is understood... no checking whether gcc -Wall is understood... yes checking whether g++ -Wall is understood... no checking whether gcc -fno-common is understood... yes checking whether g++ -fno-common is understood... no checking whether g++ -ftemplate-depth-50 is understood... no checking whether gcc -Wdeclaration-after-statement is understood... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating m4/Makefile config.status: creating libutil/Makefile config.status: creating libutil/tests/Makefile config.status: creating libutil++/Makefile config.status: creating libutil++/tests/Makefile config.status: creating libop/Makefile config.status: creating libop/tests/Makefile config.status: creating libopagent/Makefile config.status: creating libopt++/Makefile config.status: creating libdb/Makefile config.status: creating libdb/tests/Makefile config.status: creating libabi/Makefile config.status: creating libabi/tests/Makefile config.status: creating libregex/Makefile config.status: creating libregex/tests/Makefile config.status: creating libregex/stl.pat config.status: creating libregex/tests/mangled-name config.status: creating daemon/Makefile config.status: creating daemon/liblegacy/Makefile config.status: creating events/Makefile config.status: creating utils/Makefile config.status: creating doc/Makefile config.status: creating doc/xsl/catalog-1.xml config.status: creating doc/oprofile.1 config.status: creating doc/opcontrol.1 config.status: creating doc/ophelp.1 config.status: creating doc/opreport.1 config.status: creating doc/opannotate.1 config.status: creating doc/opgprof.1 config.status: creating doc/oparchive.1 config.status: creating doc/opimport.1 config.status: creating doc/srcdoc/Doxyfile config.status: creating libpp/Makefile config.status: creating opjitconv/Makefile config.status: creating pp/Makefile config.status: creating gui/Makefile config.status: creating gui/ui/Makefile config.status: creating module/Makefile config.status: creating module/x86/Makefile config.status: creating module/ia64/Makefile config.status: creating agents/Makefile config.status: creating agents/jvmti/Makefile config.status: creating agents/jvmpi/Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing depfiles commands doc/xsl/catalog.xml is unchanged Warning: a working Qt not found; no GUI will be built [hschmidt@mainro03 oprofile-0.9.5]$ sudo make make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5' Making all in . make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5' Making all in m4 make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/m4' make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/m4' Making all in libutil make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil' Making all in . make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_file.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_file.Tpo" -c -o op_file.o op_file.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_file.Tpo" ".deps/op_file.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_file.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_fileio.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_fileio.Tpo" -c -o op_fileio.o op_fileio.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_fileio.Tpo" ".deps/op_fileio.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_fileio.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_libiberty.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_libiberty.Tpo" -c -o op_libiberty.o op_libiberty.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_libiberty.Tpo" ".deps/op_libiberty.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_libiberty.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_popt.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_popt.Tpo" -c -o op_popt.o op_popt.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_popt.Tpo" ".deps/op_popt.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_popt.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_string.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_string.Tpo" -c -o op_string.o op_string.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_string.Tpo" ".deps/op_string.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_string.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_version.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_version.Tpo" -c -o op_version.o op_version.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_version.Tpo" ".deps/op_version.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_version.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_growable_buffer.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_growable_buffer.Tpo" -c -o op_growable_buffer.o op_growable_buffer.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_growable_buffer.Tpo" ".deps/op_growable_buffer.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_growable_buffer.Tpo"; exit 1; fi rm -f libutil.a ar cru libutil.a op_deviceio.o op_lockfile.o op_file.o op_fileio.o op_get_time.o op_libiberty.o op_popt.o op_string.o op_cpufreq.o op_version.o op_growable_buffer.o ranlib libutil.a make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil' Making all in tests make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil/tests' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil/tests' make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil' Making all in libop make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libop' Making all in . make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libop' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_events.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_events.Tpo" -c -o op_events.o op_events.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_events.Tpo" ".deps/op_events.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_events.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_mangle.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_mangle.Tpo" -c -o op_mangle.o op_mangle.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_mangle.Tpo" ".deps/op_mangle.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_mangle.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT op_alloc_counter.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/op_alloc_counter.Tpo" -c -o op_alloc_counter.o op_alloc_counter.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/op_alloc_counter.Tpo" ".deps/op_alloc_counter.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/op_alloc_counter.Tpo"; exit 1; fi rm -f libop.a ar cru libop.a op_events.o op_parse_event.o op_cpu_type.o op_mangle.o op_get_interface.o op_alloc_counter.o op_config.o op_xml_events.o op_xml_out.o ranlib libop.a make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libop' Making all in tests make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libop/tests' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libop/tests' make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libop' Making all in libopagent make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libopagent' /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libopagent.la -rpath /usr/lib64/oprofile -version-info 1:0:0 -Wl,--version-script=../libopagent/opagent_symbols.ver libopagent_la-opagent.lo -lbfd -liberty -ldl gcc -shared .libs/libopagent_la-opagent.o -lbfd -liberty -ldl -Wl,--version-script=../libopagent/opagent_symbols.ver -Wl,-soname -Wl,libopagent.so.1 -o .libs/libopagent.so.1.0.0 /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libbfd.a(archures.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `bfd_i386_arch' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libbfd.a: could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [libopagent.la] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libopagent' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5' make: *** [all] Error 2 locate libbfd.a /usr/lib/libbfd.a /usr/lib64/libbfd.a /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/lib64/libbfd.a 8bb6e102daf9ea7bd3b09ef388956d5b /usr/lib64/libbfd.a /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/lib/libbfd.a f5494699a61189baf2e2705e52b67c22 /usr/lib/libbfd.a ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ oprofile-list mailing list oprofile-list@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list |
|
|
Re: Build issue for 0.9.5 on Redhat 5 (has there been follow up since Aug 09?)
by William Cohen
::
Rate this Message:
Heidi Schmidt wrote:
> I’m running into the same make issue that I think a few others have > experienced on RH 5 for oprofile-0.9.5 via the mailing list thread Re: > 0.9.5 building on RHEL5 broken > Is there a patch now ? or previous version that is known to compile on > RH5? If so, I’ll nab either one. Thanks for the bandwidth. > > Heidi > > > Here is what I found and hope the information helps with a future patch. > > Notes: > > 1. It would be good to add to the install docs the requirement of the > profile os user and group > 2. I ran the configure initially with ./configure > --with-kernel-support and then ran the example below without the > flags for java, qt, abi, and debug from post > http://marc.info/?l=oprofile-list&m=124907559400470&w=2 > <http://marc.info/?l=oprofile-list&m=124907559400470&w=2> (the > config and make details below)_ > 3. Details of the system and the release I pulled down and typical cpu > > > Uname details > Linux 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 13:58:24 EST 2009 x86_64 > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > more /etc/redhat-release > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga) > > rpm -qa | grep binutil > binutils-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 > binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 > binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 Why are different versions of binutil and binutil-devel being used? That doesn't look like the correct version of binutils-devel. I thing that you are encountering an old bug fixed in 2.17.50.0.6-7.el5 (bz #430856): Note that there a bug in the binutils-2.17.50.0.6-12.el5 that will cause problems for oprofile: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529028 However, you should be okay with binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 -Will > *make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libopagent' > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libopagent.la > -rpath /usr/lib64/oprofile -version-info 1:0:0 > -Wl,--version-script=../libopagent/opagent_symbols.ver > libopagent_la-opagent.lo -lbfd -liberty -ldl > gcc -shared .libs/libopagent_la-opagent.o -lbfd -liberty -ldl > -Wl,--version-script=../libopagent/opagent_symbols.ver -Wl,-soname > -Wl,libopagent.so.1 -o .libs/libopagent.so.1.0.0 > /usr/bin/ld: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libbfd.a(archures.o): > relocation R_X86_64_32 against `bfd_i386_arch' can not be used when > making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libbfd.a: could > not read symbols: Bad value > *collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [libopagent.la] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libopagent' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5' > make: *** [all] Error 2 > > locate libbfd.a > /usr/lib/libbfd.a > /usr/lib64/libbfd.a > > /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/lib64/libbfd.a > 8bb6e102daf9ea7bd3b09ef388956d5b /usr/lib64/libbfd.a > > /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/lib/libbfd.a > f5494699a61189baf2e2705e52b67c22 /usr/lib/libbfd.a> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ oprofile-list mailing list oprofile-list@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list |
|
|
Re: Build issue for 0.9.5 on Redhat 5 (binutil follow up re: 2.17.50.0.6-7.el5)
by Heidi Schmidt
::
Rate this Message:
Hi William, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ oprofile-list mailing list oprofile-list@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list |
|
|
Re: Build issue for 0.9.5 on Redhat 5 (binutil follow up re: 2.17.50.0.6-7.el5)
by William Cohen
::
Rate this Message:
Heidi Schmidt wrote:
> Hi William, > > It appears that I am using the binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 that you > mentioned should work, fwiw. Posting it here so others have the info/bkgrd > as well. > > rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libbfd.a > binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 > > Meanwhile, Thanks for the tip for the other binutil version. > I've got to hunt around for our RHN acct/passwd to get a look see at (bz > #430856) > I've made notes re: fixed in 2.17.50.0.6-7.el5 and avoid > binutils-2.17.50.0.6-12.el5. Unfortunately, bz #430856 is not visible outside of Red Hat. The bug is mentioned in the binutils.spec file changelog. There is a similar bug report for fedora that will give you a good idea what the problem was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447426 > I'll ask our systems engineering group to obtain the rpm for > 2.17.50.0.6-7.el5 and any dependencies. Good luck getting everything set up. -Will ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ oprofile-list mailing list oprofile-list@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list |
|
|
Re: Build issue for 0.9.5 on Redhat 5 (op_bfd.o failure on make)
by Heidi Schmidt
::
Rate this Message:
Hi William,
I nabbed the binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 and now have run into another error (error 127) and the only hint found while web searching is an OS2 link. And it makes mention that it may be tied to the gcc compiler(?) for op_bfd.o I can provide the strings output on the most recent compiled archive libutil.a if needed. Any insight appreciated, Heidi make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libdb' if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -I ../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT db_manage.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/db_manage.Tpo" -c -o db_manage.o db_manage.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/db_manage.Tpo" ".deps/db_manage.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/db_manage.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -I ../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT db_insert.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/db_insert.Tpo" -c -o db_insert.o db_insert.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/db_insert.Tpo" ".deps/db_insert.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/db_insert.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -I ../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT db_travel.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/db_travel.Tpo" -c -o db_travel.o db_travel.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/db_travel.Tpo" ".deps/db_travel.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/db_travel.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -I ../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT db_debug.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/db_debug.Tpo" -c -o db_debug.o db_debug.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/db_debug.Tpo" ".deps/db_debug.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/db_debug.Tpo"; exit 1; fi if gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libop -I ../libutil -W -Wall -fno-common -Wdeclaration-after-statement -g -O2 -MT db_stat.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/db_stat.Tpo" -c -o db_stat.o db_stat.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/db_stat.Tpo" ".deps/db_stat.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/db_stat.Tpo"; exit 1; fi rm -f libodb.a ar cru libodb.a db_manage.o db_insert.o db_travel.o db_debug.o db_stat.o ranlib libodb.a make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libdb' Making all in tests make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libdb/tests' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libdb/tests' make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libdb' Making all in libutil++ make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil++' Making all in . make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil++' source='op_bfd.cpp' object='op_bfd.o' libtool=no \ DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none /bin/sh ../depcomp \ g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I ../libutil -I ../libop -I ../libpp -I../include -c -o op_bfd.o op_bfd.cpp ../depcomp: line 512: exec: g++: not found make[3]: *** [op_bfd.o] Error 127 make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil++' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil++' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5' make: *** [all] Error 2 rpm -qa | grep gcc libgcc-4.1.2-44.el5 libgcc-4.1.2-44.el5 gcc-4.1.2-44.el5 which gcc /usr/bin/gcc gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-44) Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. rpm -qa | grep libutil date Wed Oct 28 09:43:17 EDT 2009 rpm -qa | grep binutil binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 binutils-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libbfd.a binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 locate op_bfd pwd /tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libutil ls -l op_bfd* ls: op_bfd*: No such file or directory grep -i op_bfd * grep -i op_ * Binary file libutil.a matches <slew of matches deleted> md5sum libutil.a bc1f3dfc4cfab363becb85fa21497ec9 libutil.a ls -ltra libutil.a -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 102712 Oct 28 09:38 libutil.a On 10/26/09 3:05 PM, "William Cohen" <wcohen@...> wrote: > Heidi Schmidt wrote: >> I¹m running into the same make issue that I think a few others have >> experienced on RH 5 for oprofile-0.9.5 via the mailing list thread Re: >> 0.9.5 building on RHEL5 broken >> Is there a patch now ? or previous version that is known to compile on >> RH5? If so, I¹ll nab either one. Thanks for the bandwidth. >> >> Heidi >> >> >> Here is what I found and hope the information helps with a future patch. >> >> Notes: >> >> 1. It would be good to add to the install docs the requirement of the >> profile os user and group >> 2. I ran the configure initially with ./configure >> --with-kernel-support and then ran the example below without the >> flags for java, qt, abi, and debug from post >> http://marc.info/?l=oprofile-list&m=124907559400470&w=2 >> <http://marc.info/?l=oprofile-list&m=124907559400470&w=2> (the >> config and make details below)_ >> 3. Details of the system and the release I pulled down and typical cpu >> >> >> Uname details >> Linux 2.6.18-128.1.1.el5 #1 SMP Mon Jan 26 13:58:24 EST 2009 x86_64 >> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> more /etc/redhat-release >> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.3 (Tikanga) >> >> rpm -qa | grep binutil >> binutils-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 >> binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 >> binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-5.el5 > > Why are different versions of binutil and binutil-devel being used? That > doesn't > look like the correct version of binutils-devel. I thing that you are > encountering an old bug fixed in 2.17.50.0.6-7.el5 (bz #430856): > > > Note that there a bug in the binutils-2.17.50.0.6-12.el5 that will cause > problems for oprofile: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529028 > > However, you should be okay with binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-9.el5 > > -Will > > >> *make[2]: Entering directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libopagent' >> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -o libopagent.la >> -rpath /usr/lib64/oprofile -version-info 1:0:0 >> -Wl,--version-script=../libopagent/opagent_symbols.ver >> libopagent_la-opagent.lo -lbfd -liberty -ldl >> gcc -shared .libs/libopagent_la-opagent.o -lbfd -liberty -ldl >> -Wl,--version-script=../libopagent/opagent_symbols.ver -Wl,-soname >> -Wl,libopagent.so.1 -o .libs/libopagent.so.1.0.0 >> /usr/bin/ld: >> : >> relocation R_X86_64_32 against `bfd_i386_arch' can not be used when >> making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/libbfd.a: could >> not read symbols: Bad value >> *collect2: ld returned 1 exit status >> make[2]: *** [libopagent.la] Error 1 >> make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5/libopagent' >> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 >> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/oprofile-0.9.5' >> make: *** [all] Error 2 >> >> locate libbfd.a >> /usr/lib/libbfd.a >> /usr/lib64/libbfd.a >> >> /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/lib64/libbfd.a >> 8bb6e102daf9ea7bd3b09ef388956d5b /usr/lib64/libbfd.a >> >> /usr/bin/md5sum /usr/lib/libbfd.a >> f5494699a61189baf2e2705e52b67c22 /usr/lib/libbfd.a> > -- Heidi Schmidt Senior Systems Engineer Online Buddies, Inc. http://www.online-buddies.com/ Office: 617-225-2727 NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ oprofile-list mailing list oprofile-list@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
