Bundles

View: New views
6 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Bundles

by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

To avoid freeness issues etc., I would be very happy if there were a
variant of the Pike source tarball without bundled libraries. From
debian/copyright:

> The upstream tarball has been repacked without the 'bundles'
> subdirectory, which contains redundant copies of some libraries, to
> avoid shipping some non-DFSG-compliant bits (see the gmp package)
> and having to include the copyright information and licenses of
> those libraries.

In any case, why is there both a libffi-3.0.4.tar.gz and its unpacked
contents?

Re: Bundles

by Martin Baehr :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 06:35:02AM +0000, Magnus Holmgren, Millnet/Lysator/Debian/Mensa @ Pike developers forum wrote:
> To avoid freeness issues etc., I would be very happy if there were a
> variant of the Pike source tarball without bundled libraries.

actually, i'd like to see that from a simple packaging perspective.
the bundles will never be used in linux distribution packages, because
we'll always have seperate packages for those anyways.

a tarball without bundles would be smaller and thus more convenient to
use.

greetings, martin.

Bundles

by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

>In any case, why is there both a libffi-3.0.4.tar.gz and its unpacked
>contents?

I think that is a mistake; the tar gets unpacked when building Pike,
and then it seems that "make export" has included it.  A fix of
bin/export.pike would be in order.

Bundles

by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

>To avoid freeness issues etc., I would be very happy if there were a
>variant of the Pike source tarball without bundled libraries.

Well, I can make a second "unbundled" package as part of the uploading
process to pelix since I have that scripted now anyway. Could you
check if just removing the bundles directly works?

>In any case, why is there both a libffi-3.0.4.tar.gz and its unpacked
>contents?

That missfeature in bin/export.pike has been fixed now.

Re: Bundles

by Martin Baehr :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:50:02PM +0000, Peter Bortas @ Pike  developers forum wrote:
> Well, I can make a second "unbundled" package as part of the uploading
> process to pelix since I have that scripted now anyway.

that would be very nice.

> Could you check if just removing the bundles directly works?

you mean by removing the bundles from the current tarball and building
the package from that? i suppose magnus already did that for debian.
i can try it too...

greetings, martin.

Re: Bundles

by Marcus Comstedt (ACROSS) (Hail Ilpalazzo!) @ Pike (-) developers forum :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Yes, that is what I mean.