Nabble - CCRMA - Software

Re: F12 on Macbook Pro

2009-12-22T06:01:00Z

On Tuesday 22 December 2009 06:47:11 am G Foster wrote:
> However, the akmod for ndiswrapper needed for the wireless drivers
> (Broadcom) wouldn't build against the RT kernel it seemed.

Enable RPMFUSION's non-free repo, and install the broadcom-wl and akmod-wl
packages; no need for ndiswrapper with Broadcom. While I don't have a Macbook
Pro, I have a very closely similar laptop with a BCM4321 802.11n card that
should be very comparable (in the OS X 86 scene, this particular laptop and
wireless card is one of the recommended units to turn into a 'hackintosh').

If nothing else, you can see if it works or not.... :-)

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

From forum: PlanetCCRMA - General

F12 on Macbook Pro

2009-12-22T03:47:11Z

Hi list,

Just to say that I gave the new Fedora release a spin on my Macbook
Pro. I managed to install the binary NVIDIA drivers using akmods and
that led to me being able to boot the RT kernel and see the login
screen.

However, the akmod for ndiswrapper needed for the wireless drivers
(Broadcom) wouldn't build against the RT kernel it seemed.

Also there were some stability issues. X died when I clicked on the
fast user switch applet I think it was.

A lot better than the last release when booting the RT kernel gave me
a black screen though. Here's hoping for F13 I suppose!

Hope this helps people with Macbook Pro's.

Ta,

Gaz

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

From forum: PlanetCCRMA - General

Re: ams...etc

2009-12-21T16:26:41Z

Am Montag 21 Dezember 2009 schrieb Fernando Lopez-Lezcano:

> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:07 -0500, Robert Vogel wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 22:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 11:33 -0500, Robert Vogel wrote:
> > > > I installed Fedora 10 on my quad-core 64 AMD machine, then the Planet
> > > > CCRMA package. Mostly, it seems to run well and I am pleased.
> > > >
> > > > But ... AMS seems to be broken. When I try the first of the demo
> > > > applications (bass_advenv.ams) it comes up with a dialog box:
> > > >
> > > > 'could not find LADSPA plugin "Freeverb Version 3" from library cmt'
> > > >
> > > > followed by another box
> > > >
> > > > 'could not find LADSPA plugin "Mvclpf-3 from library "mvclpf24"
> > > >
> > > > Then, the components appear unconnected on the brown background.
> > >
> > > Ams needs a bunch of ladspa plugins to do its work. They should have
> > > been pulled in as dependencies, I don't know why they are not
> > > installed.
> > >
> > > Do a "yum list ladspa*plugins" and install whatever is not installed
> > > from the list (I don't remember which ones are needed). Then try
> > > again...
> >
> > Thank you Fernando for the reply.
> >
> > Here's what happens when I do the command:
> >
> > # yum list ladspa*plugins
> > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> > Installed Packages
> > ladspa-amb-plugins.x86_64 0.3.0-2.fc9
> > @fedora
> > ladspa-blop-plugins.x86_64 0.2.8-7.fc9
> > @fedora
> > ladspa-calf-plugins.x86_64
> > 0.0.18.5-2.fc10 @updates
> > ladspa-caps-plugins.x86_64
> > 0.4.2-4.fc10 @updates
> > ladspa-cmt-plugins.x86_64 1.16-1.fc10
> > @updates
> > ladspa-fil-plugins.x86_64
> > 0.3.0-1.fc10 @updates
> > ladspa-mcp-plugins.x86_64
> > 1:0.4.0-1.fc9 @fedora
> > ladspa-nova-plugins.x86_64
> > 0.2-1.fc10.ccrma @planetccrma
> > ladspa-rev-plugins.x86_64 0.3.1-4.fc9
> > @fedora
> > ladspa-swh-plugins.x86_64
> > 0.4.15-15.fc10 @updates
> > ladspa-tap-plugins.x86_64 0.7.0-5.fc9
> > @fedora
> > ladspa-vco-plugins.x86_64 0.3.0-6.fc9
> > @fedora
> > ladspa-vocoder-plugins.x86_64
> > 0.3-1.fc10.ccrma @planetccrma
> >
> > It is not clear to me what else is necessary.
>
> It would seem that you have all the ladspa plugins installed (ie: there
> are no entries under an "Available" heading). Have you tried any of the
> other examples?
>
> I don't know what may be wrong. Do you get any error messages
> in /var/log/messages or the output of dmesg when you start ams? (and/or
> start ams from a terminal to see if it prints anything that may give you
> a clue).
>
> I seem to remember that some ldaspa packages had problems when selinux
> was enabled, you may want to disable it to test...
>
> Sorry I can't be more specific, I just don't have the time right now to
> try this myself.

ams possibly wrongly assumes the 32bit ladspa path.
try starting ams like below
$ LADSPA_PATH=/usr/lib64/ladspa ams
does it help?

karsten

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

From forum: PlanetCCRMA - General

Re: Questions that might be able to be added to the FAQs

2009-12-21T15:59:34Z

On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 08:59 -0500, William M. Quarles wrote:

> On 12/14/2009 3:04 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 15:27 -0500, William M. Quarles wrote:
> >> Hi Fernando (and fellow list subsribers),
> >>
> >> I have some questions that might belong in the FAQs. I'd also like to
> >> know the answers to these.
> >>
> >> 1. At what point do you start building packages new Fedora releases?
> >
> > Well, as soon as I can :-) Usually I don't start trying to build package
> > before the release but rather immediately after. How long it takes
> > depends (at least historically) on how different is the build
> > environment and how difficult it is to make packages build - big changes
> > in gcc have made it complicated in the past, fc12 was not so bad.
>
> I've just been a bit worried I suppose, because there still hasn't been
> an official announcement of complete (or at least near-complete) support
> for Fedora 11 or 12 on the Planet website yet. I've installed Planet
> CCRMA on Fedora 11 machine, but alas don't seem to ever get around to
> trying it out.

Fedora 11 is complete (and has been for a while). Fedora 12 is also in
pretty good shape, I think only missing the planetccrma-apps package
which I need to rework. I seem to never find time to update the web
site...

> >> 2. How can I contribute to Planet CCRMA (besides branching the software
> >> to cover other architectures/distributions)?
> >
> > If you have specific patches that address problems you could send them
> > to me. What other architectures would you be interested in using?
> > Distributions?
>
> I was interested in trying to see if I could get Planet CCRMA RPMS to
> build on a ppc-based Power Mac running Fedora with just making the
> appropriate changes to config files and spec files of your existing
> SRPMs to adjust for the architecture. Do you think that might work?

It should work. In fact it should not require changes to the .config
files as they are based on the Fedora configuration files which I think
still support ppc.

I _think_ someone else on the list had done that before (building on
ppc)

> If
> not, the only programming languages that I ever learned to use were
> BASIC and FORTRAN, which I am sure doesn't help the Planet followers
> much. However, I would like to try see if the build can be done just by
> changing configs and specs.
>
> > A very good way to contribute if you are into building packages would be
> > to become a Fedora packager and try to move packages from Planet CCRMA
> > to Fedora. There are many that could be moved, the more that are in
> > Fedora proper the better...
>
> Gee, I thought you used to detest the idea of moving packages over to
> the f.k.a. "Fedora Extras." What's changed?

A lot has changed :-) There are advantages and disadvantages, but the
pros outnumber the cons I think. What I could not do is do the migration
myself, I just don't have the time. But others are very welcome to do it
and many are now helping with that.

> >> 3. How can I build a custom kernel from the Planet CCRMA kernel-rt SRPM?
> >> (I've tried using the instructions from the Fedora Project Wiki on
> >> Fedora 10 and I don't think that they quite translate over to the Planet
> >> kernel-rt SRPMs. Not only that, I have doubts that they still are valid
> >> for the actual Fedora kernel SRPMs for Fedora 11 and above, because they
> >> don't seem to work without modifications to the spec file).
> >
> > I think building from the srpm should be the same as for other Fedora
> > kernels. You do have to use the proper .src.rpm package - for example
> > older kernels will probably not build correctly for fc12. Which one are
> > you interested in rebuilding?
>
> I think I had tried rebuilding Planet real-time kernels for 9 and 10
> back when I had those installed, and neither would work. There was
> always a compile-time error. I think I even tried rebuilding without
> changing the config file nor the spec file, and I couldn't get the
> PLanet rt kernel to build. Also, it looked as if the config files I made
> for those kernels get overwritten or bypassed in the spec file such that
> a default config file is used anyway, although I'm not entirely certain
> of that. I might be wrong, but it looks like the same bypass/overwriting
> is happening when I try to rebuild a custom kernel based on the standard
> non-rt Fedora kernels on Fedora 12.

There is a base config* file which has some things overriden by more
specific config* files. If you unpack the source package you will see
them in the SOURCES/ directory (look for config* files).

Of course there might be problems with rebuilding if you hit things that
don't build on ppc or should be treated differently on ppc.

-- Fernando

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

From forum: PlanetCCRMA - General

Re: ams...etc

2009-12-21T13:16:21Z

On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 16:07 -0500, Robert Vogel wrote:

> On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 22:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 11:33 -0500, Robert Vogel wrote:
> > > I installed Fedora 10 on my quad-core 64 AMD machine, then the Planet
> > > CCRMA package. Mostly, it seems to run well and I am pleased.
> > >
> > > But ... AMS seems to be broken. When I try the first of the demo
> > > applications (bass_advenv.ams) it comes up with a dialog box:
> > >
> > > 'could not find LADSPA plugin "Freeverb Version 3" from library cmt'
> > >
> > > followed by another box
> > >
> > > 'could not find LADSPA plugin "Mvclpf-3 from library "mvclpf24"
> > >
> > > Then, the components appear unconnected on the brown background.
> >
> > Ams needs a bunch of ladspa plugins to do its work. They should have
> > been pulled in as dependencies, I don't know why they are not
> > installed.
> >
> > Do a "yum list ladspa*plugins" and install whatever is not installed
> > from the list (I don't remember which ones are needed). Then try
> > again...
>
> Thank you Fernando for the reply.
>
> Here's what happens when I do the command:
>
> # yum list ladspa*plugins
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> Installed Packages
> ladspa-amb-plugins.x86_64 0.3.0-2.fc9
> @fedora
> ladspa-blop-plugins.x86_64 0.2.8-7.fc9
> @fedora
> ladspa-calf-plugins.x86_64
> 0.0.18.5-2.fc10 @updates
> ladspa-caps-plugins.x86_64
> 0.4.2-4.fc10 @updates
> ladspa-cmt-plugins.x86_64 1.16-1.fc10
> @updates
> ladspa-fil-plugins.x86_64
> 0.3.0-1.fc10 @updates
> ladspa-mcp-plugins.x86_64
> 1:0.4.0-1.fc9 @fedora
> ladspa-nova-plugins.x86_64
> 0.2-1.fc10.ccrma @planetccrma
> ladspa-rev-plugins.x86_64 0.3.1-4.fc9
> @fedora
> ladspa-swh-plugins.x86_64
> 0.4.15-15.fc10 @updates
> ladspa-tap-plugins.x86_64 0.7.0-5.fc9
> @fedora
> ladspa-vco-plugins.x86_64 0.3.0-6.fc9
> @fedora
> ladspa-vocoder-plugins.x86_64
> 0.3-1.fc10.ccrma @planetccrma
>
> It is not clear to me what else is necessary.

It would seem that you have all the ladspa plugins installed (ie: there
are no entries under an "Available" heading). Have you tried any of the
other examples?

I don't know what may be wrong. Do you get any error messages
in /var/log/messages or the output of dmesg when you start ams? (and/or
start ams from a terminal to see if it prints anything that may give you
a clue).

I seem to remember that some ldaspa packages had problems when selinux
was enabled, you may want to disable it to test...

Sorry I can't be more specific, I just don't have the time right now to
try this myself.

-- Fernando

> > > So then, I went to Synaptic thinking to uninstall it and re-installing,
> > > but to do that it says it will also remove planetccrma-apps.
> >
> > You can reinstall a package from the command line with "yum reinstall
> > package_name", but that would not fix this particular problem....

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

From forum: PlanetCCRMA - General

Re: ams...etc

2009-12-21T13:07:53Z

On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 22:59 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:

On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 11:33 -0500, Robert Vogel wrote:
> I installed Fedora 10 on my quad-core 64 AMD machine, then the Planet
> CCRMA package. Mostly, it seems to run well and I am pleased.
> 
> But ... AMS seems to be broken. When I try the first of the demo
> applications (bass_advenv.ams) it comes up with a dialog box:
> 
>  'could not find LADSPA plugin "Freeverb Version 3" from library cmt'
> 
> followed by another box
> 
>  'could not find LADSPA plugin "Mvclpf-3 from library "mvclpf24"
> 
> Then, the components appear unconnected on the brown background.

Ams needs a bunch of ladspa plugins to do its work. They should have
been pulled in as dependencies, I don't know why they are not
installed. 

Do a "yum list ladspa*plugins" and install whatever is not installed
from the list (I don't remember which ones are needed). Then try
again...

Thank you Fernando for the reply.

Here's what happens when I do the command:

# yum list ladspa*plugins
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Installed Packages
ladspa-amb-plugins.x86_64                                  0.3.0-2.fc9                                    @fedora
ladspa-blop-plugins.x86_64                                 0.2.8-7.fc9                                    @fedora
ladspa-calf-plugins.x86_64                                 0.0.18.5-2.fc10                                @updates
ladspa-caps-plugins.x86_64                                 0.4.2-4.fc10                                   @updates
ladspa-cmt-plugins.x86_64                                  1.16-1.fc10                                    @updates
ladspa-fil-plugins.x86_64                                  0.3.0-1.fc10                                   @updates
ladspa-mcp-plugins.x86_64                                  1:0.4.0-1.fc9                                  @fedora
ladspa-nova-plugins.x86_64                                 0.2-1.fc10.ccrma                               @planetccrma
ladspa-rev-plugins.x86_64                                  0.3.1-4.fc9                                    @fedora
ladspa-swh-plugins.x86_64                                  0.4.15-15.fc10                                 @updates
ladspa-tap-plugins.x86_64                                  0.7.0-5.fc9                                    @fedora
ladspa-vco-plugins.x86_64                                  0.3.0-6.fc9                                    @fedora
ladspa-vocoder-plugins.x86_64                              0.3-1.fc10.ccrma                               @planetccrma

It is not clear to me what else is necessary.

Bob


> So then, I went to Synaptic thinking to uninstall it and re-installing,
> but to do that it says it will also remove planetccrma-apps.

You can reinstall a package from the command line with "yum reinstall
package_name", but that would not fix this particular problem....

-- Fernando

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

From forum: PlanetCCRMA - General

Re: Questions that might be able to be added to the FAQs

2009-12-21T05:59:24Z

On 12/14/2009 3:04 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:

> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 15:27 -0500, William M. Quarles wrote:
>> Hi Fernando (and fellow list subsribers),
>>
>> I have some questions that might belong in the FAQs. I'd also like to
>> know the answers to these.
>>
>> 1. At what point do you start building packages new Fedora releases?
>
> Well, as soon as I can :-) Usually I don't start trying to build package
> before the release but rather immediately after. How long it takes
> depends (at least historically) on how different is the build
> environment and how difficult it is to make packages build - big changes
> in gcc have made it complicated in the past, fc12 was not so bad.

I've just been a bit worried I suppose, because there still hasn't been
an official announcement of complete (or at least near-complete) support
for Fedora 11 or 12 on the Planet website yet. I've installed Planet
CCRMA on Fedora 11 machine, but alas don't seem to ever get around to
trying it out.

>> 2. How can I contribute to Planet CCRMA (besides branching the software
>> to cover other architectures/distributions)?
>
> If you have specific patches that address problems you could send them
> to me. What other architectures would you be interested in using?
> Distributions?

I was interested in trying to see if I could get Planet CCRMA RPMS to
build on a ppc-based Power Mac running Fedora with just making the
appropriate changes to config files and spec files of your existing
SRPMs to adjust for the architecture. Do you think that might work? If
not, the only programming languages that I ever learned to use were
BASIC and FORTRAN, which I am sure doesn't help the Planet followers
much. However, I would like to try see if the build can be done just by
changing configs and specs.

> A very good way to contribute if you are into building packages would be
> to become a Fedora packager and try to move packages from Planet CCRMA
> to Fedora. There are many that could be moved, the more that are in
> Fedora proper the better...

Gee, I thought you used to detest the idea of moving packages over to
the f.k.a. "Fedora Extras." What's changed?

>> 3. How can I build a custom kernel from the Planet CCRMA kernel-rt SRPM?
>> (I've tried using the instructions from the Fedora Project Wiki on
>> Fedora 10 and I don't think that they quite translate over to the Planet
>> kernel-rt SRPMs. Not only that, I have doubts that they still are valid
>> for the actual Fedora kernel SRPMs for Fedora 11 and above, because they
>> don't seem to work without modifications to the spec file).
>
> I think building from the srpm should be the same as for other Fedora
> kernels. You do have to use the proper .src.rpm package - for example
> older kernels will probably not build correctly for fc12. Which one are
> you interested in rebuilding?

I think I had tried rebuilding Planet real-time kernels for 9 and 10
back when I had those installed, and neither would work. There was
always a compile-time error. I think I even tried rebuilding without
changing the config file nor the spec file, and I couldn't get the
PLanet rt kernel to build. Also, it looked as if the config files I made
for those kernels get overwritten or bypassed in the spec file such that
a default config file is used anyway, although I'm not entirely certain
of that. I might be wrong, but it looks like the same bypass/overwriting
is happening when I try to rebuild a custom kernel based on the standard
non-rt Fedora kernels on Fedora 12.

Peace,
William

_______________________________________________
PlanetCCRMA mailing list
PlanetCCRMA@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/planetccrma

From forum: PlanetCCRMA - General

Re: GraceCL

2009-12-21T04:18:07Z

I dont save a separate binary for this, you can build it from sources
just like the 'cm' console app. You would still need to install sndlib
to compile.

On Dec 21, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Thomas Zapf-Schramm wrote:

> Where can I find the CL Version for Grace?
>
> This link
>
> http://camil.music.uiuc.edu/Software/grace/downloads/GraceCL-3.2.4a-win32.zip
>
>
> does not work
>
> I hope you did not abandon it for the Scheme version
>
> TZS
>

_______________________________________________
Cmdist mailing list
Cmdist@...
http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist

Nabble - CCRMA - Software

Re: F12 on Macbook Pro

F12 on Macbook Pro

Re: ams...etc

Re: Questions that might be able to be added to the FAQs

Re: ams...etc

Re: ams...etc

Re: Questions that might be able to be added to the FAQs

Re: GraceCL

Re: OT?: Endless increasing pitch: How?

Re: ams...etc

Re: ams...etc

ams...etc

Re: ams etc

Re: OT?: Endless increasing pitch: How?

ams etc

Re: CLM-4 Mac OS 10.6 libclm.so problem

Re: CLM-4 Mac OS 10.6 libclm.so problem

Re: OT?: Endless increasing pitch: How?

Re: Grace

Re: OT?: Endless increasing pitch: How?

Re: CLM-4 Mac OS 10.6 libclm.so problem

Re: OT?: Endless increasing pitch: How?

Re: OT?: Endless increasing pitch: How?

OT?: Endless increasing pitch: How?

CLM-4 Mac OS 10.6 libclm.so problem

Re: iterating over a hash table

Re: iterating over a hash table

Re: iterating over a hash table

Re: How does pam.d security settings work?

guile gone

Re: iterating over a hash table

Re: iterating over a hash table

Re: iterating over a hash table

iterating over a hash table

Re: rtirq and suspend