CFV: Porters Group

[Mark Reinhold]

The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
is now over.

Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
majority vote:

  (1) Shall this new Group be created?

  (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
      Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

GB members: Please cast your votes in replies to this message.

- Mark


[1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-November/000044.html
[2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups

[Mark Reinhold]

> From: Mark Reinhold <mr@...>
> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:38:32 -0800

>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?

Yes.

>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

Yes.

- Mark

[Simon Phipps-3]

On Nov 28, 2007, at 23:38, Mark Reinhold wrote:

> The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
> is now over.
>
> Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
> Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
> majority vote:
>
>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?

Yes

>
>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

Yes

>
> GB members: Please cast your votes in replies to this message.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-November/ 
> 000044.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups

[Doug Lea]

Mark Reinhold wrote:
> The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
> is now over.
>
> Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
> Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
> majority vote:
>
>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?
>

Yes; an obvious omission in retrospect.

>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?
>

Yes.

-Doug

[Fabiane Bizinella Nardon]

Yes to both.

Fabiane


Mark Reinhold wrote:

> The two-week discussion period for the Porters Group proposal [1]
> is now over.
>
> Per the interim governance guidelines for Groups [2] the Interim
> Governance Board now has two decisions to make, each by a simple
> majority vote:
>
>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?
>
>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?
>
> GB members: Please cast your votes in replies to this message.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/announce/2007-November/000044.html
> [2] http://openjdk.java.net/groups
>
>
>  

[Mark Reinhold]

> From: Mark Reinhold <mr@...>
> To: gb-discuss@...

>   (1) Shall this new Group be created?
>
>   (2) If it is created, shall it have the power to grant
>       Membership in the OpenJDK Community?

Thank you for your prompt votes.

For the record, the GB has voted unanimously in favor of both motions.

- Mark