CVE-2008-4609

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

CVE-2008-4609

by Andrew Storms :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Now that the details are out - MS and Cisco patched today.
I went looking back into the FreeBSD security announcements and don't seem
to be able to find any references for a patch.
Did FreeBSD already patch or discuss this bug and I missed it?

http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-4609

Thanks

-_S

_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."

Parent Message unknown RE: CVE-2008-4609

by olli hauer :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

> Now that the details are out - MS and Cisco patched today.
> I went looking back into the FreeBSD security announcements and don't
> seem
> to be able to find any references for a patch.
> Did FreeBSD already patch or discuss this bug and I missed it?
>
> http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-4609
>
> Thanks
>
> -_S

According the more complete list at
http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2008-4609
the latest rel. (FreeBSD 6.4/7.2, OpenBSD 4.4+)  are not a affected.

It seems if you run the latest versions of Free/OpenBSD you are fine.

olli
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."

Re: CVE-2008-4609

by Dag-Erling Smørgrav :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Andrew Storms <astorms@...> writes:
> Now that the details are out - MS and Cisco patched today.  I went
> looking back into the FreeBSD security announcements and don't seem to
> be able to find any references for a patch.  Did FreeBSD already patch
> or discuss this bug and I missed it?

This is old news:

http://www.google.com/#&q=sockstress

The initial version was just connection flooding - they thought it was a
big deal because they came up with a very clever and complicated setup
to increase the flood rate, when in fact a short C program using bpf
could have done the job just as well.  When people pointed out that it
was a load of bs, they started making wild claims about more serious
attacks, the details of which would be released at the next compsec
conference, except not really, because we're still working on it, but
the next one, we promise, for real this time...

Just read their website (http://www.sockstress.com/), it'll give you an
idea of just how far off their rocker they are.

DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@...
_______________________________________________
freebsd-security@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@..."