|
»
»
Camel vs. SMX Maven repository
|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Camel vs. SMX Maven repository
by Martin Krasser
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which Maven repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel. http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html We finally discussed the two options: - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix Maven repo) - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo) Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option do you prefer? Thanks, Martin |
|
|
Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository
by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Martin,
for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX dependency (like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload artifacts and dependencies to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the ServiceMix Camel component should have this repository in its pom. Let see the feeling of the other guys. Regards JB Martin Krasser wrote: > Hi, > > I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which Maven > repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel. > > http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html > > We finally discussed the two options: > > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix Maven > repo) > - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo) > Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option do > you prefer? > > Thanks, > Martin > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré (Nanthrax) BuildProcess/AutoDeploy Project Leader http://buildprocess.sourceforge.net jb@... PGP : 17D4F086 |
|
|
Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository
by Martin Krasser
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
seems that there are no objections against uploading the artifacts to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo. So I'll put them there. Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb: > Hi Martin, > > for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX > dependency (like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload > artifacts and dependencies to > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the ServiceMix > Camel component should have this repository in its pom. > > Let see the feeling of the other guys. > > Regards > JB > > Martin Krasser wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which >> Maven repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel. >> >> http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html >> >> We finally discussed the two options: >> >> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix >> Maven repo) >> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo) >> Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option >> do you prefer? >> >> Thanks, >> Martin >> >> > |
|
|
Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository
by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
::
Rate this Message:
Hi Martin,
thanks for the update, I will add the new repo in the servicemix-camel pom. Regards JB Martin Krasser wrote: > Hi Jean-Baptiste, > > seems that there are no objections against uploading the artifacts to > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo. So I'll put them there. > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb: >> Hi Martin, >> >> for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX >> dependency (like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload >> artifacts and dependencies to >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the ServiceMix >> Camel component should have this repository in its pom. >> >> Let see the feeling of the other guys. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> Martin Krasser wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which >>> Maven repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel. >>> >>> http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html >>> >>> We finally discussed the two options: >>> >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix >>> Maven repo) >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo) >>> Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option >>> do you prefer? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Martin >>> >>> >> > |
|
|
Re: Camel vs. SMX Maven repository
by Jean-Baptiste Onofré
::
Rate this Message:
Done,
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo has been added in the servicemix-camel component trunk. Regards JB Martin Krasser wrote: > Hi Jean-Baptiste, > > seems that there are no objections against uploading the artifacts to > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo. So I'll put them there. > > Jean-Baptiste Onofré schrieb: >> Hi Martin, >> >> for my part, I think that we need to consider Camel as a SMX >> dependency (like CXF, ActiveMQ, etc). So, Camel should upload >> artifacts and dependencies to >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo and the ServiceMix >> Camel component should have this repository in its pom. >> >> Let see the feeling of the other guys. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> Martin Krasser wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I started a thread on the Camel dev mailing list discussing which >>> Maven repo to use for uploading new artifacts needed by Camel. >>> >>> http://old.nabble.com/GAE-API-in-Maven-repo-tt26243221s22882.html >>> >>> We finally discussed the two options: >>> >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo/ (ServiceMix >>> Maven repo) >>> - https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/camel/m2-repo/ (Camel Maven repo) >>> Camel already uses the ServiceMix repo to download jars. Which option >>> do you prefer? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Martin >>> >>> >> > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
