Can't recompose LAB: Specified layer # not found

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Can't recompose LAB: Specified layer # not found

by Colin Brace :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi all,

I have just been following this very simple tutorial using a LAB overlay technique:

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15173919

These are the main steps:

5)Duplicate B layer, set "B Copy" to overlay (Opacity is 100%).
6)Merge both B layers (Image>Merge Visible Layers/CTRL-M) Choose Expand as necessary (though other options don't make a difference in this case) Hit Ok.
7)Repeat steps #4 through #6 for the "A" layer.

However, after following these steps, when I click the "Recompose" command, I get an error message on the status line:

Specified layer [some number] not found.

If I skip the overlay steps, just decompose to LAB and recompose, it works OK. Any idea what is going wrong here?

I am using v2.6.4 under F10.

Thanks.
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl

Re: Can't recompose LAB: Specified layer # not found

by saulgoode :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Quoting Colin Brace <cb@...>:
   :
   :

> 5)Duplicate B layer, set "B Copy" to overlay (Opacity is 100%).
> 6)Merge both B layers (Image>Merge Visible Layers/CTRL-M) Choose Expand as
> necessary (though other options don't make a difference in this case) Hit
> Ok.
> 7)Repeat steps #4 through #6 for the "A" layer.
>
> However, after following these steps, when I click the "Recompose" command,
> I get an error message on the status line:
>
> Specified layer [some number] not found.

The problem is that 'Recompose' relies upon the layer IDs of the three  
layers and your merging of two layers results in the new layer being  
given a different layer ID.

As a work-around, you need to duplicate your B layer twice and work  
with the two copies, leaving the original layer untouched. After you  
have completed your editing and merged your copies together, perform  
an "Edit->Cut", Paste it onto the original layer, and Anchor the  
floating layer.

Unlike Merging, pasting and anchoring will not change the layer ID of  
the original layer and Recompose will function as expected.


_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@...
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user

Re: Can't recompose LAB: Specified layer # not found

by Dave 77459 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I found this old Q/A after trying the tutorial referenced:

http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,15173919

Here is the full list of steps:

1)Open Image
2)Go to Image>Mode>Decompose
3)Check LAB, Check Decompose to Layers, hit OK
4)Open Layers dialog. Make only the B layer visible.
5)Duplicate B layer, set "B Copy" to overlay (Opacity is 100%).
6)Merge both B layers (Image>Merge Visible Layers/CTRL-M) Choose Expand as necessary (though other options don't make a difference in this case) Hit Ok.
7)Repeat steps #4 through #6 for the "A" layer.
8)Select "L" layer, apply a slight S curve, mostly adjusted towards the dark end of the curve. (GIMP's overlay is calculated a bit differently)
9)Image>Mode>Recompose and Make sure you select LAB with the correct layer order.

Following the help provided below (Copy, Anchor), I could do it.  But I have a question regarding Step 9 above.  Is the order of the layers important?  It seems that the layers are tagged, so as long as the original layers are present, the order shouldn't matter.  Right?

Not to confuse issues, but my original reason for looking at the above page was for this PS tutorial:

http://freeonlineclasses.net/photoshop-tutorials/photo-effects/the-golden-glow.html

On page two of this tutorial, when they pick the B channel (from LAB), they get an orangy cast.  I faked this by picking the B layer from the LAB decomposition, then color changing to shift red and yellow to the limits.  I don't know what LAB is doing, but the result is pleasing and seems to mimic the tutorial.  But is there a direct corollary to the golden glow tutorial?

Dave



On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:08 PM, <saulgoode@...> wrote:
Quoting Colin Brace <cb@...>:
  :
  :
> 5)Duplicate B layer, set "B Copy" to overlay (Opacity is 100%).
> 6)Merge both B layers (Image>Merge Visible Layers/CTRL-M) Choose Expand as
> necessary (though other options don't make a difference in this case) Hit
> Ok.
> 7)Repeat steps #4 through #6 for the "A" layer.
>
> However, after following these steps, when I click the "Recompose" command,
> I get an error message on the status line:
>
> Specified layer [some number] not found.

The problem is that 'Recompose' relies upon the layer IDs of the three
layers and your merging of two layers results in the new layer being
given a different layer ID.

As a work-around, you need to duplicate your B layer twice and work
with the two copies, leaving the original layer untouched. After you
have completed your editing and merged your copies together, perform
an "Edit->Cut", Paste it onto the original layer, and Anchor the
floating layer.

Unlike Merging, pasting and anchoring will not change the layer ID of
the original layer and Recompose will function as expected.


_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@...
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user


_______________________________________________
Gimp-user mailing list
Gimp-user@...
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user