|
View:
New views
20 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
|
|
Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by Philip Wilkinson
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Hi,
When my form validation fails, the page is redisplayed with the default url with all its wicket:interface stuff. I'd rather this didn't happen as I've bookmarked the page, and would prefer to have the bookmarked url redisplayed. (the bookmarked url was initially displayed for the page) I've tried overriding Form.onError() { setResponsePage(WelcomePage.class, new PageParameters()); } and that got me my nice bookmarked url, but lost all my form field values. Obviously creating a new page instance. I've also tried Form.onError() { setResponsePage(WelcomePage.this); } but this didn't help. I just got the default url. Is it possible with wicket to only have the bookmarkable urls visible, without exposing the wicket internals in the url? Thanks in advance Philip Wilkinson. |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by David Leangen-8
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Philip, You need to also include all your form values in the PageParamters, and parse those values in your page, filling each of the fields with those values. Does that make sense? So, your url would be something like: /myPage?field1=blah&checkbox1=true&... Cheers, Dave On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 13:48 -0700, Philip Wilkinson wrote: > Hi, > > When my form validation fails, the page is redisplayed with the default url > with all its wicket:interface stuff. > I'd rather this didn't happen as I've bookmarked the page, and would prefer > to have the bookmarked url redisplayed. (the bookmarked url was initially > displayed for the page) > > I've tried overriding Form.onError() { setResponsePage(WelcomePage.class, > new PageParameters()); } > and that got me my nice bookmarked url, but lost all my form field values. > Obviously creating a new page instance. > > I've also tried Form.onError() { setResponsePage(WelcomePage.this); } > > Is it possible with wicket to only have the bookmarkable urls visible, > without exposing the wicket internals in the url? > > Thanks in advance > Philip Wilkinson. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by Philip Wilkinson
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Thanks for that Dave.
It does make sense. But I know the values are stored in the session pagemap, so I'd like to be able to get them from there. I was hoping that a combination of a bookmarked url, and maybe cookie or hidden field, managed by wicket, would be enough for wicket not to stray from my 'nice' bookmarked url, and not to expose wickets inner workings via a url. Cheers.
|
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by David Leangen-8
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Philip, > But I know the values are stored in the session pagemap, so I'd like > to be able to get them from there. I was hoping that a combination > of a bookmarked url, and maybe cookie or hidden field, managed > by wicket, would be enough for wicket not to stray from my 'nice' > bookmarked url, and not to expose wickets inner workings via a > url. You got me really curious with this. I can't really help you, but now I really want to know more about this. I checked out the request lifecycle and found this page when googling: http://www.wicket-wiki.org.uk/wiki/index.php/Lifecycle What I'm trying to figure out is where Form.onSubmit() fits in, since this is where you determine the page that you redirect to, and logically (to me) this is where the URL of the next page gets set up. What I can't figure out here is this: when the form's submit button gets pressed on the current page, obvious a new HttpServletRequest gets sent to the server, and the onSubmit() method gets invoked. 1. What URL is sent to the server? 2. Since the response can differ according to the input of the form, this means that the URL could change according to the input... but the URL is already decided on in step 1 Obviously, there's something I'm not getting here. (Euhhhh, experienced Wicket people: feel free to step in any time ;-) In any case, once we can understand this lifecycle issue, we'll be able to figure out whether or not you can achieve what you're trying to do. Regards, David ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On 7/4/07, David Leangen <wicket@...> wrote:
the url that is defined in form.action attribute in html. it tells wicket that the form has been submitted, pointing out which one. 2. Since the response can differ according to the input the url is the same but the post values are different. -igor ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On 7/4/07, Philip Wilkinson <wilkinson.philip@...> wrote:
the cookie idea mightve worked, but it would mean that we would have to rewrite every link to set the cookie, so essentially wicket will not work without javascript. :| -igor Cheers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by Philip Wilkinson
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message I've thought of a way of making my question clearer.
I have a web page with a form which is accessed thru a bookmarked url so the address looks like http://localhost:8080/MyApp/myform I submit the form and the validation fails, the url in the address bar now looks like this http://localhost:8080/MyApp/myform?wicket:interface=:0::: I'd prefer not to see the "?wicket:interface=:0:::" in the url. It's a implementation detail that nobody needs to see. Its not book-markable anymore, and it gives any malicious hacker out there too much info. Is theres any way I can get wicket just to show the bookmarked url when it redisplays the page? Cheers, Phil.
|
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by David Leangen-8
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 12:14 -0700, Philip Wilkinson wrote: > I've thought of a way of making my question clearer. > > I have a web page with a form which is accessed thru a bookmarked url so the > address looks like > http://localhost:8080/MyApp/myform > > I submit the form and the validation fails, the url in the address bar now > looks like this > http://localhost:8080/MyApp/myform?wicket:interface=:0::: > > I'd prefer not to see the "?wicket:interface=:0:::" in the url. It's a > implementation detail that nobody needs to see. Its not book-markable > anymore, and it gives any malicious hacker out there too much info. > > Is theres any way I can get wicket just to show the bookmarked url when it > redisplays the page? Oh... If that's all you need... Why not just use "nice urls"? Note that if you don't include any page parameters (or some other way of retrieving the data), your user will have to fill in all the form details from scratch... not sure that's what you want. Cheers, Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by David Leangen-8
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Thanks, Igor, that makes sense. But still one more question before I really understand onSubmit(): I could have this in my onSubmit: if( isValidated ) setResponsePage( PageOne.class ); else setResponsePage( PageTwo.class ); So, what gets sent back in the HttpServletResponse is different according to the validation of the form (data being sent via POST and handled in the background by Wicket). Are you saying that in either case, the URL would be the same (i.e. the one generated by Wicket magic and seen in the html of the form), but the content of reply would be different depending on whether it's PageOne or PageTwo? If so... it all makes sense to me now... :-) Very smart, too! On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 07:34 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > On 7/4/07, David Leangen <wicket@...> wrote: > > > > What I can't figure out here is this: when the form's submit > button gets > pressed on the current page, obvious a new HttpServletRequest > gets sent to > the server, and the onSubmit() method gets invoked. > > 1. What URL is sent to the server? > > the url that is defined in form.action attribute in html. it tells > wicket that the form has been submitted, pointing out which one. > > 2. Since the response can differ according to the input > of the form, this means that the URL could change > according to the input... but the URL is already > decided on in step 1 > > the url is the same but the post values are different. > > > -igor > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On 7/4/07, David Leangen <wicket@...> wrote:
this is what happens in a nutshell you pull up a page that has a form, wicket has already generated an action url for that form that points back to that page. this url cannot be "pretty" because it points to a specific instance of a page wicket holds in session. you submit the form, the url in action is invoked and hits the page, along with page parameters in post. lets say validation fails - that means your form.onsubmit() is never called. what wicket does is redirect to a url that will render the current page again back to the user (it doesnt have to redirect, but it does by default - see redirect-after-post pattern for details). this url also cannot be "pretty" because it points to a specific instance of a page in session - this is the url you will see when validation fails. now if validation succeeds and your onsubmit() is called which does setresponsepage(MyPage.class) then you will be redirected to a "pretty" url given that MyPage is mounted. now if you want to maintain pretty url throughout then you might want to try using a statelesspage and a stateless form. however, notice that you would only be allowed to have stateless components on that page (components that do not generate a callback back to themselves - images, regular Links, etc) -igor If so... it all makes sense to me now... :-) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by David Leangen-8
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Igor, > hope this helps some Yep. Helps me to understand how this works. Very clever. Thanks! Hopefully it will also help Philip, who was asking the questions about this. Cheers, Dave On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 20:31 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > On 7/4/07, David Leangen <wicket@...> wrote: > > Thanks, Igor, that makes sense. > > But still one more question before I really understand > onSubmit(): > > I could have this in my onSubmit: > > if( isValidated ) > setResponsePage( PageOne.class ); > else > setResponsePage( PageTwo.class ); > > > So, what gets sent back in the HttpServletResponse is > different > according to the validation of the form (data being sent via > POST and > handled in the background by Wicket). > > Are you saying that in either case, the URL would be the same > (i.e. the > one generated by Wicket magic and seen in the html of the > form), but the > content of reply would be different depending on whether it's > PageOne or > PageTwo? > > this is what happens in a nutshell > > you pull up a page that has a form, wicket has already generated an > action url for that form that points back to that page. this url > cannot be "pretty" because it points to a specific instance of a page > wicket holds in session. > > you submit the form, the url in action is invoked and hits the page, > along with page parameters in post. > > lets say validation fails - that means your form.onsubmit() is never > called. what wicket does is redirect to a url that will render the > current page again back to the user (it doesnt have to redirect, but > it does by default - see redirect-after-post pattern for details). > this url also cannot be "pretty" because it points to a specific > instance of a page in session - this is the url you will see when > validation fails. > > now if validation succeeds and your onsubmit() is called which does > setresponsepage(MyPage.class) then you will be redirected to a > "pretty" url given that MyPage is mounted. > > now if you want to maintain pretty url throughout then you might want > to try using a statelesspage and a stateless form. however, notice > that you would only be allowed to have stateless components on that > page (components that do not generate a callback back to themselves - > images, regular Links, etc) > > > hope this helps some > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On Wednesday, July 4, 2007, 8:14:36 PM, Philip <wilkinson.philip@...> wrote:
> I have a web page with a form which is accessed thru a bookmarked url so the > address looks like > http://localhost:8080/MyApp/myform > > I submit the form and the validation fails, the url in the address bar now > looks like this > http://localhost:8080/MyApp/myform?wicket:interface=:0::: > I'd prefer not to see the "?wicket:interface=:0:::" in the url. It's a > implementation detail that nobody needs to see. Its not book-markable > anymore, and it gives any malicious hacker out there too much info. In what way does it give "too much info"? The fact that it's using Wicket? The URL's session relative, so not going to be replayable. /Gwyn ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by josh02
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message
Thanks for the explanation igor, I would like to use google analytics on all our pages, hence I need to have all the pages mounted with niceurls... or at least something like " http://server/app/niceurl/?wicket....." would be ok.... However, when a validation fails, my page becomes http://server/app/?wicket::... and instead of something like http://server/app/niceurl/?wicket::... am I doing something wrong? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message
no, you are not. as of right now wicket will not keep a mount in the path. we have talked about doing that for a while, but just havent found the time. please add an rfe for 1.4 and we will look into it. -igor Joshua ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by Philip Wilkinson
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Thanks for all the answers everybody.
So the short answer is no, you cant get a 'Nice URL' when the form validation fails. I'd just like to mention that the servlet container uses cookies to store the session id, or if cookies disabled on the client, then it rewrites the url so you end up with something like ;jsessionid=3A7B12AACDD0D61915DC968AA9935269 in your url. So in that case, your nice url is shot anyway. I think thats fine, because you have the option of enabling cookies to get nice urls, or not enabling cookies and getting ;jsessionid. It would be nice if I could configure wicket to use cookies (like the servlet container) when enabled on the client to store the information it currently encodes in url (?wicket:interface=:0:::) Anyway thanks again for everyones input. Philip Wilkinson.
|
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On 7/5/07, Philip Wilkinson <wilkinson.philip@...> wrote: It would be nice if I could configure wicket to use cookies (like the i dont think you fully understand the impact of this change. a servlet container only needs to set a cookie once per session - and its value doesnt change. wicket would have to do this every request and set it to different values. that means you can never have a regular link in your html - it would _always_ have to be a link with a javascript handler that sets the cookie. that is a big ugly drain. if you are really set on having that behavior, then like i said, use stateless pages and forms. if that doesnt work then of course you can plugin your own url coding strategy - but for what you want i would not imagine it would be a trivial thing to write. -igor Anyway thanks again for everyones input. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by David Leangen-8
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message In 1.2.6, how can a stateless form be simulated? On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:05 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > > On 7/5/07, Philip Wilkinson <wilkinson.philip@...> wrote: > It would be nice if I could configure wicket to use cookies > (like the > servlet container) when enabled on the client to store the > information it > currently encodes in url (?wicket:interface=:0:::) > > i dont think you fully understand the impact of this change. a servlet > container only needs to set a cookie once per session - and its value > doesnt change. wicket would have to do this every request and set it > to different values. that means you can never have a regular link in > your html - it would _always_ have to be a link with a javascript > handler that sets the cookie. that is a big ugly drain. > > if you are really set on having that behavior, then like i said, use > stateless pages and forms. if that doesnt work then of course you can > plugin your own url coding strategy - but for what you want i would > not imagine it would be a trivial thing to write. > > -igor > > > > > > > Anyway thanks again for everyones input. > Philip Wilkinson. > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > > > On 7/4/07, Philip Wilkinson <wilkinson.philip@...> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> Thanks for that Dave. > >> It does make sense. > >> But I know the values are stored in the session pagemap, so > I'd like to > >> be > >> able to get them from there. I was hoping that a > combination of a > >> bookmarked > >> url, and maybe cookie or hidden field, managed by wicket, > would be enough > >> for wicket not to stray from my 'nice' bookmarked url, and > not to expose > >> wickets inner workings via a url. > > > > > > the cookie idea mightve worked, but it would mean that we > would have to > > rewrite every link to set the cookie, so essentially wicket > will not work > > without javascript. :| > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > > Cheers. > >> > >> > >> David Leangen-8 wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > Philip, > >> > > >> > You need to also include all your form values in the > PageParamters, and > >> > parse those values in your page, filling each of the > fields with those > >> > values. > >> > > >> > Does that make sense? > >> > > >> > > >> > So, your url would be something like: > >> > > >> > /myPage?field1=blah&checkbox1=true&... > >> > > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Dave > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 13:48 -0700, Philip Wilkinson > wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> When my form validation fails, the page is redisplayed > with the > >> default > >> >> url > >> >> with all its wicket:interface stuff. > >> >> I'd rather this didn't happen as I've bookmarked the > page, and would > >> >> prefer > >> >> to have the bookmarked url redisplayed. (the bookmarked > url was > >> initially > >> >> displayed for the page) > >> >> > >> >> I've tried overriding Form.onError() { setResponsePage( > >> WelcomePage.class, > >> >> new PageParameters()); } > >> >> and that got me my nice bookmarked url, but lost all my > form field > >> >> values. > >> >> Obviously creating a new page instance. > >> >> > >> >> I've also tried Form.onError() > { setResponsePage(WelcomePage.this); } > >> >> > >> >> Is it possible with wicket to only have the bookmarkable > urls visible, > >> >> without exposing the wicket internals in the url? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks in advance > >> >> Philip Wilkinson. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > >> > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express > and take > >> > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get > it now. > >> > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > Wicket-user mailing list > >> > Wicket-user@... > >> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-get-a-%27Nice-URL% > 27-when-form-validation-fails--tf4020865.html#a11429922 > >> Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > >> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express > and take > >> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it > now. > >> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Wicket-user mailing list > >> Wicket-user@... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and > take > > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it > now. > > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Wicket-user mailing list > > Wicket-user@... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-get-a-%27Nice-URL% > 27-when-form-validation-fails--tf4020865.html#a11455607 > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and > take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it > now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-user mailing list > Wicket-user@... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express > Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take > control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. > http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ > _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On 7/5/07, David Leangen <wicket@...> wrote:
stateless forms are 1.3 only afaik -igor On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 17:05 -0700, Igor Vaynberg wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
Re: Can I get a 'Nice URL' when form validation fails?
by josh02
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message On 7/6/07, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@...> wrote: On 7/5/07, Joshua Lim <lim.josh@...> wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
|
|
RESTFUL?
by Nino.Martinez
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message This is writen completely without thinking, so I might have missed the
obvious.. But could wicket be used for RESTFUL webservices? I know we can make the nice urls and we can produce xml responses, but does it make sense? regards Nino ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |