|
»
»
Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
|
View:
New views
14 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot access
the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also planning on doing type conversion yourself then? -igor 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@...>: > Hello, > > I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" event I want to > update some form components. But I need to read data from other fields of > the form for doing so, and so I added an AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the > DropDownChoice. > > My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from the other > fields, and depending on these data, update some other components... but the > problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the form data, but > also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation messages to > appear when changing the value of the drop down). > > If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just > setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything like that in > AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... > > Is there a way to do this? > > Regards, > Daniel. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by dfernandez
::
Rate this Message:
Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I would really need type conversion in this case. I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: |OPERATOR |V| |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and INPUT2 two TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and INPUT2 are required (when they are visible, of course). When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, hiding INPUT1 and INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have the same contents that were on INPUT1 before: |OPERATOR |V| |INPUT3="aBc" | The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read the value from INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will receive a validation message telling me that it is required... which it is, but I just want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit the form, and not now that I am only changing the operator. Thanks. Regards, Daniel.
|
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use
ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access to the raw values. -igor On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez <dfernandez@...> wrote: > > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I would really need > type conversion in this case. > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: > > |OPERATOR |V| > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and INPUT2 two > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and INPUT2 are > required (when they are visible, of course). > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, hiding INPUT1 and > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have the same > contents that were on INPUT1 before: > > |OPERATOR |V| > > |INPUT3="aBc" | > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read the value from > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will receive a > validation message telling me that it is required... which it is, but I just > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit the form, and > not now that I am only changing the operator. > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Daniel. > > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: >> >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot access >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also planning >> on doing type conversion yourself then? >> >> -igor >> >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@...>: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" event I want to >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from other fields of >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the >>> DropDownChoice. >>> >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from the other >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other components... but >>> the >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the form data, but >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation messages >>> to >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). >>> >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything like that in >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... >>> >>> Is there a way to do this? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Daniel. >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by tleveque
::
Rate this Message:
Any following on that?
Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote your own behavior? I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick way to solve my problem. Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax behavior? Thanks Thierry On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@...> wrote: > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) > > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access to the > raw values. > > -igor > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez > <dfernandez@...> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I would really > need > > type conversion in this case. > > > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: > > > > |OPERATOR |V| > > > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | > > > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and INPUT2 two > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and INPUT2 are > > required (when they are visible, of course). > > > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, hiding INPUT1 > and > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have the same > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: > > > > |OPERATOR |V| > > > > |INPUT3="aBc" | > > > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read the value > from > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will receive a > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it is, but I > just > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit the form, and > > not now that I am only changing the operator. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > Daniel. > > > > > > > > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > >> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot access > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also planning > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? > >> > >> -igor > >> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@...>: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" event I want > to > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from other fields > of > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the > >>> DropDownChoice. > >>> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from the other > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other components... > but > >>> the > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the form data, > but > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation > messages > >>> to > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). > >>> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything like that in > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... > >>> > >>> Is there a way to do this? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Daniel. > >>> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by Stefan Malmesjö
::
Rate this Message:
Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form has
been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work? /Stefan On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@...> wrote: > Any following on that? > > Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote your own > behavior? > > I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick way to > solve my problem. > > Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax behavior? > > Thanks > > Thierry > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@...> > wrote: > > > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use > > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) > > > > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple > > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to > > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access to the > > raw values. > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez > > <dfernandez@...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I would really > > need > > > type conversion in this case. > > > > > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: > > > > > > |OPERATOR |V| > > > > > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | > > > > > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and INPUT2 two > > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and INPUT2 > are > > > required (when they are visible, of course). > > > > > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, hiding > INPUT1 > > and > > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have the same > > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: > > > > > > |OPERATOR |V| > > > > > > |INPUT3="aBc" | > > > > > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read the value > > from > > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will receive a > > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it is, but I > > just > > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit the form, > and > > > not now that I am only changing the operator. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Daniel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > >> > > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot access > > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also planning > > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? > > >> > > >> -igor > > >> > > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@...>: > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" event I want > > to > > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from other > fields > > of > > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to > the > > >>> DropDownChoice. > > >>> > > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from the > other > > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other components... > > but > > >>> the > > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the form data, > > but > > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation > > messages > > >>> to > > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). > > >>> > > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just > > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything like that > in > > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... > > >>> > > >>> Is there a way to do this? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Daniel. > > >>> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html > > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > > > > |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by Stefan Malmesjö
::
Rate this Message:
I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at
least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on a textfield that is required, I don't really know. Maybe that path is too complicated. /Stefan On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote: > Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form > has been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work? > > /Stefan > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@... > <mailto:tleveque@...>> wrote: > > Any following on that? > > Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote > your own > behavior? > > I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick > way to > solve my problem. > > Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax > behavior? > > Thanks > > Thierry > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg > <igor.vaynberg@... <mailto:igor.vaynberg@...>> wrote: > > > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use > > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) > > > > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple > > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to > > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access > to the > > raw values. > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez > > <dfernandez@... > <mailto:dfernandez@...>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I > would really > > need > > > type conversion in this case. > > > > > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: > > > > > > |OPERATOR |V| > > > > > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | > > > > > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and > INPUT2 two > > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and > INPUT2 are > > > required (when they are visible, of course). > > > > > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, > hiding INPUT1 > > and > > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have > the same > > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: > > > > > > |OPERATOR |V| > > > > > > |INPUT3="aBc" | > > > > > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read > the value > > from > > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will > receive a > > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it > is, but I > > just > > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit > the form, and > > > not now that I am only changing the operator. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Daniel. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > > >> > > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot > access > > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also > planning > > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? > > >> > > >> -igor > > >> > > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@... > <mailto:dfernandez@...>>: > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" > event I want > > to > > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from > other fields > > of > > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an > AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the > > >>> DropDownChoice. > > >>> > > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from > the other > > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other > components... > > but > > >>> the > > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the > form data, > > but > > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation > > messages > > >>> to > > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). > > >>> > > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just > > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything > like that in > > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... > > >>> > > >>> Is there a way to do this? > > >>> > > >>> Regards, > > >>> Daniel. > > >>> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > <mailto:users-help@...> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html > > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > <mailto:users-help@...> > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > <mailto:users-help@...> > > > > > > |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by tleveque
::
Rate this Message:
Thanks, but I was not talking about using the submit behavior.
I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the value of multiple form fields. I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I encounter this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but this time I am stuck. There should be a simple way to create an ajax behavior that will send the values from the form components we want. Maybe with the option to validate them or not. What do you think? Thierry 2009/7/7 Stefan Malmesjö <s.m.mogul@...> > I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at > least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on a > textfield that is required, I don't really know. > > Maybe that path is too complicated. > > /Stefan > > On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote: > >> Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form has >> been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work? >> >> /Stefan >> >> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@...<mailto: >> tleveque@...>> wrote: >> >> Any following on that? >> >> Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote >> your own >> behavior? >> >> I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick >> way to >> solve my problem. >> >> Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax >> behavior? >> >> Thanks >> >> Thierry >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg >> <igor.vaynberg@... <mailto:igor.vaynberg@...>> wrote: >> >> > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use >> > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) >> > >> > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple >> > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to >> > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access >> to the >> > raw values. >> > >> > -igor >> > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez >> > <dfernandez@... >> <mailto:dfernandez@...>> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I >> would really >> > need >> > > type conversion in this case. >> > > >> > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: >> > > >> > > |OPERATOR |V| >> > > >> > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | >> > > >> > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and >> INPUT2 two >> > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and >> INPUT2 are >> > > required (when they are visible, of course). >> > > >> > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, >> hiding INPUT1 >> > and >> > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have >> the same >> > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: >> > > >> > > |OPERATOR |V| >> > > >> > > |INPUT3="aBc" | >> > > >> > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read >> the value >> > from >> > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will >> receive a >> > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it >> is, but I >> > just >> > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit >> the form, and >> > > not now that I am only changing the operator. >> > > >> > > Thanks. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Daniel. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > igor.vaynberg wrote: >> > >> >> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot >> access >> > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also >> planning >> > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? >> > >> >> > >> -igor >> > >> >> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@... >> <mailto:dfernandez@...>>: >> >> > >>> Hello, >> > >>> >> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" >> event I want >> > to >> > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from >> other fields >> > of >> > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an >> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the >> > >>> DropDownChoice. >> > >>> >> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from >> the other >> > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other >> components... >> > but >> > >>> the >> > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the >> form data, >> > but >> > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation >> > messages >> > >>> to >> > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). >> > >>> >> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just >> > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything >> like that in >> > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... >> > >>> >> > >>> Is there a way to do this? >> > >>> >> > >>> Regards, >> > >>> Daniel. >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> <mailto:users-help@...> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> > > -- >> > > View this message in context: >> > >> >> http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html >> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> <mailto:users-help@...> >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> <mailto:users-help@...> >> > >> > >> >> >> > |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by Vladimir K
::
Rate this Message:
From the ajax perspective it should be possible to submit any dom element with its descendants. I believe it is exactly what Wicket ajax submit is doing. IMO forms needed just for regular form submit.
We just need to change an implementation to accept a list of dom elements instead of just one. I don't have an opinion about reasons to handle partial form submitting lifecycle on the server side.
|
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by Vladimir K
::
Rate this Message:
Wicket has strong rules how to handle ajax form submit. Therefore partial form submitting should be handled differently on the server side.
Anyway we could handle raw strings or invoke converter ourselves.
|
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
you can see how the submit behavior does it and replicate the parts
you need. all these things are not using some magical internal apis. you are meant to build your own things when the default implementations do not do what you want. -igor On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Leveque<tleveque@...> wrote: > Thanks, but I was not talking about using the submit behavior. > > I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the value > of multiple form fields. > > I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I encounter > this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but this time I am stuck. > There should be a simple way to create an ajax behavior that will send the > values from the form components we want. Maybe with the option to validate > them or not. > What do you think? > > Thierry > > > 2009/7/7 Stefan Malmesjö <s.m.mogul@...> > >> I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at >> least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on a >> textfield that is required, I don't really know. >> >> Maybe that path is too complicated. >> >> /Stefan >> >> On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote: >> >>> Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form has >>> been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work? >>> >>> /Stefan >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@...<mailto: >>> tleveque@...>> wrote: >>> >>> Any following on that? >>> >>> Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote >>> your own >>> behavior? >>> >>> I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick >>> way to >>> solve my problem. >>> >>> Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax >>> behavior? >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Thierry >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg >>> <igor.vaynberg@... <mailto:igor.vaynberg@...>> wrote: >>> >>> > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use >>> > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) >>> > >>> > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple >>> > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents to >>> > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access >>> to the >>> > raw values. >>> > >>> > -igor >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez >>> > <dfernandez@... >>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I >>> would really >>> > need >>> > > type conversion in this case. >>> > > >>> > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: >>> > > >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| >>> > > >>> > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | >>> > > >>> > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and >>> INPUT2 two >>> > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and >>> INPUT2 are >>> > > required (when they are visible, of course). >>> > > >>> > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, >>> hiding INPUT1 >>> > and >>> > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have >>> the same >>> > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: >>> > > >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| >>> > > >>> > > |INPUT3="aBc" | >>> > > >>> > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read >>> the value >>> > from >>> > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will >>> receive a >>> > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it >>> is, but I >>> > just >>> > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit >>> the form, and >>> > > not now that I am only changing the operator. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks. >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > Daniel. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > igor.vaynberg wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot >>> access >>> > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also >>> planning >>> > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? >>> > >> >>> > >> -igor >>> > >> >>> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@... >>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>>: >>> >>> > >>> Hello, >>> > >>> >>> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" >>> event I want >>> > to >>> > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from >>> other fields >>> > of >>> > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the >>> > >>> DropDownChoice. >>> > >>> >>> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from >>> the other >>> > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other >>> components... >>> > but >>> > >>> the >>> > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the >>> form data, >>> > but >>> > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want validation >>> > messages >>> > >>> to >>> > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). >>> > >>> >>> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just >>> > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything >>> like that in >>> > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Is there a way to do this? >>> > >>> >>> > >>> Regards, >>> > >>> Daniel. >>> > >>> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >>> <mailto:users-help@...> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > View this message in context: >>> > >>> >>> http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html >>> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >>> <mailto:users-help@...> >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >>> <mailto:users-help@...> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by tleveque
::
Rate this Message:
Of course, but the goal of using a framework like Wicket is just that: avoid
having to write everything by myself. No? So it is a suggestion to add in a future release. I think a lot of people need that kind of functionality. If it could be generic enough. I think Ajax is rarely used to submit a form. It is more to make it dynamic. Like adapting the form content based on other fields values. I can see tons of examples for that. It would be very nice to be able to do that kind of stuff without having to rewrite part of the code ourselves. I I find time to write it myself I will be glad to give my code to the Wicket team... Thierry On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 15:40, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@...> wrote: > you can see how the submit behavior does it and replicate the parts > you need. all these things are not using some magical internal apis. > you are meant to build your own things when the default > implementations do not do what you want. > > -igor > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Leveque<tleveque@...> wrote: > > Thanks, but I was not talking about using the submit behavior. > > > > I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the > value > > of multiple form fields. > > > > I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I > encounter > > this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but this time I am > stuck. > > There should be a simple way to create an ajax behavior that will send > the > > values from the form components we want. Maybe with the option to > validate > > them or not. > > What do you think? > > > > Thierry > > > > > > 2009/7/7 Stefan Malmesjö <s.m.mogul@...> > > > >> I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at > >> least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on > a > >> textfield that is required, I don't really know. > >> > >> Maybe that path is too complicated. > >> > >> /Stefan > >> > >> On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote: > >> > >>> Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form > has > >>> been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work? > >>> > >>> /Stefan > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@... > <mailto: > >>> tleveque@...>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Any following on that? > >>> > >>> Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote > >>> your own > >>> behavior? > >>> > >>> I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick > >>> way to > >>> solve my problem. > >>> > >>> Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax > >>> behavior? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> Thierry > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg > >>> <igor.vaynberg@... <mailto:igor.vaynberg@...>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use > >>> > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) > >>> > > >>> > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple > >>> > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents > to > >>> > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access > >>> to the > >>> > raw values. > >>> > > >>> > -igor > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez > >>> > <dfernandez@... > >>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I > >>> would really > >>> > need > >>> > > type conversion in this case. > >>> > > > >>> > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: > >>> > > > >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| > >>> > > > >>> > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | > >>> > > > >>> > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and > >>> INPUT2 two > >>> > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and > >>> INPUT2 are > >>> > > required (when they are visible, of course). > >>> > > > >>> > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, > >>> hiding INPUT1 > >>> > and > >>> > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have > >>> the same > >>> > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: > >>> > > > >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| > >>> > > > >>> > > |INPUT3="aBc" | > >>> > > > >>> > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read > >>> the value > >>> > from > >>> > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will > >>> receive a > >>> > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it > >>> is, but I > >>> > just > >>> > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit > >>> the form, and > >>> > > not now that I am only changing the operator. > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks. > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards, > >>> > > Daniel. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > igor.vaynberg wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot > >>> access > >>> > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also > >>> planning > >>> > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? > >>> > >> > >>> > >> -igor > >>> > >> > >>> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@... > >>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>>: > >>> > >>> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" > >>> event I want > >>> > to > >>> > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from > >>> other fields > >>> > of > >>> > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the > >>> > >>> DropDownChoice. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from > >>> the other > >>> > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other > >>> components... > >>> > but > >>> > >>> the > >>> > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the > >>> form data, > >>> > but > >>> > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want > validation > >>> > messages > >>> > >>> to > >>> > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just > >>> > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything > >>> like that in > >>> > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Is there a way to do this? > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> Daniel. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> > >>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > >>> <mailto:users-help@...> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > >> > >>> > > > >>> > > -- > >>> > > View this message in context: > >>> > > >>> > >>> > http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html > >>> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> > >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > >>> <mailto:users-help@...> > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > >>> <mailto:users-help@...> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... > > |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by igor.vaynberg
::
Rate this Message:
no, the goal of a framework is to make the 90% usecase easy and the
10% usecase possible. there arent many threads on this list requesting this particular feature so i guess its not that common a usecase. of course, you can always add a jira ticket with a patch. -igor On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Thierry Leveque<tleveque@...> wrote: > Of course, but the goal of using a framework like Wicket is just that: avoid > having to write everything by myself. No? > > So it is a suggestion to add in a future release. I think a lot of people > need that kind of functionality. If it could be generic enough. > > I think Ajax is rarely used to submit a form. It is more to make it dynamic. > Like adapting the form content based on other fields values. I can see tons > of examples for that. > It would be very nice to be able to do that kind of stuff without having to > rewrite part of the code ourselves. > > I I find time to write it myself I will be glad to give my code to the > Wicket team... > > Thierry > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 15:40, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynberg@...> wrote: > >> you can see how the submit behavior does it and replicate the parts >> you need. all these things are not using some magical internal apis. >> you are meant to build your own things when the default >> implementations do not do what you want. >> >> -igor >> >> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Thierry Leveque<tleveque@...> wrote: >> > Thanks, but I was not talking about using the submit behavior. >> > >> > I was talking about the way to create my own ajax behavior to send the >> value >> > of multiple form fields. >> > >> > I think this should be part of Wicket. It is not the first time I >> encounter >> > this problem. The first time, I found a workaround but this time I am >> stuck. >> > There should be a simple way to create an ajax behavior that will send >> the >> > values from the form components we want. Maybe with the option to >> validate >> > them or not. >> > What do you think? >> > >> > Thierry >> > >> > >> > 2009/7/7 Stefan Malmesjö <s.m.mogul@...> >> > >> >> I just realized that maybe you need to extend your validators, too, at >> >> least if you want your modelobject to be updated. And how you do that on >> a >> >> textfield that is required, I don't really know. >> >> >> >> Maybe that path is too complicated. >> >> >> >> /Stefan >> >> >> >> On 2009-07-06 22:55, Stefan Malmesjö wrote: >> >> >> >>> Could setting visibility for the FeedbackPanel to false until the form >> has >> >>> been "properly" submitted with a press of a submit button work? >> >>> >> >>> /Stefan >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Thierry Leveque <tleveque@... >> <mailto: >> >>> tleveque@...>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Any following on that? >> >>> >> >>> Daniel, have you been able to solve your problem? Did you wrote >> >>> your own >> >>> behavior? >> >>> >> >>> I have the same requirement as you and I am trying to find a quick >> >>> way to >> >>> solve my problem. >> >>> >> >>> Can someone point me to some examples on how to write my own Ajax >> >>> behavior? >> >>> >> >>> Thanks >> >>> >> >>> Thierry >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:21, Igor Vaynberg >> >>> <igor.vaynberg@... <mailto:igor.vaynberg@...>> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > well, if you do not want to *submit* the form then dont use >> >>> > ajaxformSUBMITbehavior :) >> >>> > >> >>> > with little work you can roll your own behavior that does a simple >> >>> > ajax get and appends whatever values you need from formcomponents >> to >> >>> > the url. that way the form is not submitted and you have access >> >>> to the >> >>> > raw values. >> >>> > >> >>> > -igor >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, dfernandez >> >>> > <dfernandez@... >> >>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>> wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Yes, I know it is tricky, but the fact is I don't think I >> >>> would really >> >>> > need >> >>> > > type conversion in this case. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I will try to explain myself. I have the following UI: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| >> >>> > > >> >>> > > |INPUT1="aBc" | |INPUT2="DeF" | >> >>> > > >> >>> > > ...being "OPERATOR" the DropDownChoice, and both INPUT1 and >> >>> INPUT2 two >> >>> > > TextFields (String TextFields, to be precise). Both INPUT1 and >> >>> INPUT2 are >> >>> > > required (when they are visible, of course). >> >>> > > >> >>> > > When I change the value on "OPERATOR", the UI will change, >> >>> hiding INPUT1 >> >>> > and >> >>> > > INPUT2 but showing INPUT3, another TextField which should have >> >>> the same >> >>> > > contents that were on INPUT1 before: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > |OPERATOR |V| >> >>> > > >> >>> > > |INPUT3="aBc" | >> >>> > > >> >>> > > The problem is that, when changing OPERATOR, I need to read >> >>> the value >> >>> > from >> >>> > > INPUT1 to set it into INPUT3, but if INPUT2 is empty I will >> >>> receive a >> >>> > > validation message telling me that it is required... which it >> >>> is, but I >> >>> > just >> >>> > > want Wicket to validate that when I want to *really* submit >> >>> the form, and >> >>> > > not now that I am only changing the operator. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Thanks. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Regards, >> >>> > > Daniel. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > igor.vaynberg wrote: >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> how are you planning on reading the other values? you cannot >> >>> access >> >>> > >> the model so you will have to call getinput(), are you also >> >>> planning >> >>> > >> on doing type conversion yourself then? >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> -igor >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> 2009/6/2 Daniel Fernández <dfernandez@... >> >>> <mailto:dfernandez@...>>: >> >>> >> >>> > >>> Hello, >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> I have a form with a DropDownChoice, on which "onchange" >> >>> event I want >> >>> > to >> >>> > >>> update some form components. But I need to read data from >> >>> other fields >> >>> > of >> >>> > >>> the form for doing so, and so I added an >> >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior to the >> >>> > >>> DropDownChoice. >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> My intention is to read the data from the drop down and from >> >>> the other >> >>> > >>> fields, and depending on these data, update some other >> >>> components... >> >>> > but >> >>> > >>> the >> >>> > >>> problem is that AjaxFormSubmitBehavior not only sends the >> >>> form data, >> >>> > but >> >>> > >>> also *validates it*, which I don't want (I don't want >> validation >> >>> > messages >> >>> > >>> to >> >>> > >>> appear when changing the value of the drop down). >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> If it where an AjaxButton I would be able to just >> >>> > >>> setDefaultFormProcessing(false), but I don't see anything >> >>> like that in >> >>> > >>> AjaxFormSubmitBehavior... >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> Is there a way to do this? >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >>> Regards, >> >>> > >>> Daniel. >> >>> > >>> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >> >>> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >>> <mailto:users-help@...> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > > >> >>> > > -- >> >>> > > View this message in context: >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-make-AjaxFormSubmitBehavior-submit-raw-form-data-but-not--validate-it--tp23830542p23835836.html >> >>> > > Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >> >>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >>> <mailto:users-help@...> >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> >>> <mailto:users-unsubscribe@...> >> >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >>> <mailto:users-help@...> >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@... For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@... |
|
|
Re: Can I make AjaxFormSubmitBehavior submit raw form data but not validate it?
by Vladimir K
::
Rate this Message:
Igor, for now I'm concerned about how can I make sure that my code that mimics form submitting lifecycles and wicket code in coming version do the same things?
For instance the AjaxFormComponentUpdatingBehavior: @Override protected final void onEvent(final AjaxRequestTarget target) { final FormComponent<?> formComponent = getFormComponent(); if (getEvent().toLowerCase().equals("onblur") && disableFocusOnBlur()) { target.focusComponent(null); } try { formComponent.inputChanged(); formComponent.validate(); if (formComponent.hasErrorMessage()) { formComponent.invalid(); onError(target, null); } else { formComponent.valid(); if (getUpdateModel()) { formComponent.updateModel(); } onUpdate(target); } } catch (RuntimeException e) { onError(target, e); } } I should do something similar but for the list of components the behavior takes. If the coming version of Wicket does it a bit different I would have to insert a fork in my code that does version check: switch(wicketVersion) { case ...: case ...: } If wicket sources had the form processing code extracted into utility class I would employ it and be sure it should work in the new wicket version.
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
