|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Cascade delete bug (221389) fixed in 2.0 line but not 1.1 line?It seems that this cascade delete bug was fixed in the 2.0 line but not in the 1.1 line. We uncovered this bug today and are wondering if there are plans for creating a 1.1.2 patch?
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r3826 | gyorke | 2009-03-31 14:54:49 -0600 (Tue, 31 Mar 2009) | 4 lines Cascade Delete bug 221389 reviewed by James Sutherland, Andrei Ilitchev, Tom Ware Simple update missed during merge. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ eclipselink-users mailing list eclipselink-users@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users |
|
|
Re: Cascade delete bug (221389) fixed in 2.0 line but not 1.1 line?Sorry. I also forgot to mention that the problem we seem to have bumped into is a NullPointerException from the following in UnitOfWorkImpl.java
if(descriptor.hasMappingsPostCalculateChanges()) {It appears that the one map is being tested but a different map is being used. This seems to have been fixed in trunk with r3826 and we are wondering the best way to resolve this in the 1.1 line.Thanks, Russell Teabeault On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Russ Teabeault <rteabeault@...> wrote: It seems that this cascade delete bug was fixed in the 2.0 line but not in the 1.1 line. We uncovered this bug today and are wondering if there are plans for creating a 1.1.2 patch? _______________________________________________ eclipselink-users mailing list eclipselink-users@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users |
|
|
Re: Re: Cascade delete bug (221389) fixed in 2.0 line but not 1.1 line?
This section of code is only entered when using
UnidirectionalOneToManyMapping. Please file a bug for the null pointer.
The bug report you mention (221389) was not included in 1.1.2 as the potential to destabilize that stream was considered to much for a maintenance release and the issue is easily resolved by manually performing the removes within the application. If you absolutely need this functionality in the 1.1.X stream please reopen the bug with this information. --Gordon Russ Teabeault wrote: Sorry. I also forgot to mention that the problem we seem to have bumped into is a NullPointerException from the following in UnitOfWorkImpl.java _______________________________________________ eclipselink-users mailing list eclipselink-users@... https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/eclipselink-users |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |