|
»
Component burden impl committed
|
View:
New views
17 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
Still need to do some clean up, enable some more tests. Bleeding-edge runners, please give windsor/mk a more careful evaluation. It might misbehave. If it does, please report it asap. Thanks -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Colin Ramsay-2
::
Rate this Message:
My knowledge of the component burden problem is very limited, but I do feel that congratulations are in order Hammett! On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 1:17 AM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Tuna Toksoz
::
Rate this Message:
Cool! Does that mean that the release is too close?
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:17 AM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote:
-- Tuna Toksöz Typos included to enhance the readers attention! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Craig Neuwirt
::
Rate this Message:
Cool Hammett, Looks nice!! On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 7:17 PM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
Gosh, I hope so. On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Tuna Toksöz <tehlike@...> wrote: > Cool! Does that mean that the release is too close? > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 3:17 AM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote: >> >> Still need to do some clean up, enable some more tests. Bleeding-edge >> runners, please give windsor/mk a more careful evaluation. It might >> misbehave. If it does, please report it asap. >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > > > > -- > Tuna Toksöz > > Typos included to enhance the readers attention! > > > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
I've changed ccnet to invoke nant with -t:net-3.5 (or something like that). Still failing. Any hints? -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Ayende Rahien-2
::
Rate this Message:
Do we have ..net 3.5 on the server? On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
Yes. donjon uses 3.5, and is built on the same build server. On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Ayende Rahien <ayende@...> wrote: > Do we have ..net 3.5 on the server? > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote: >> >> I've changed ccnet to invoke nant with -t:net-3.5 (or something like >> that). Still failing. Any hints? >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > > > > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Louis DeJardin
::
Rate this Message:
Cool. Is this change motivated by the IServiceLocator activity in some way? This doesn't change the need to call ReleaseComponent on the outermost objects that are resolved, does it? On Oct 8, 5:21 pm, hammett <hamm...@...> wrote: > Yes. donjon uses 3.5, and is built on the same build server. > > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Ayende Rahien <aye...@...> wrote: > > Do we have ..net 3.5 on the server? > > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, hammett <hamm...@...> wrote: > > >> I've changed ccnet to invoke nant with -t:net-3.5 (or something like > >> that). Still failing. Any hints? > > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> hammett > >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > -- > Cheers, > hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
The release needs to be invoked on the root component. On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Louis DeJardin <Louis.DeJardin@...> wrote: > > Cool. Is this change motivated by the IServiceLocator activity in some > way? This doesn't change the need to call ReleaseComponent on the > outermost objects that are resolved, does it? > > On Oct 8, 5:21 pm, hammett <hamm...@...> wrote: >> Yes. donjon uses 3.5, and is built on the same build server. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 8:49 AM, Ayende Rahien <aye...@...> wrote: >> > Do we have ..net 3.5 on the server? >> >> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, hammett <hamm...@...> wrote: >> >> >> I've changed ccnet to invoke nant with -t:net-3.5 (or something like >> >> that). Still failing. Any hints? >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> hammett >> >>http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammetthttp://hammett.castleproject.org/ > > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Ayende Rahien-2
::
Rate this Message:
all calls are ending up with release policy, which needs to do explicit thread management to handle that safely. it also serialize all calls to the container that end up resolving an instance of an object. I change the hashtable syncronization in the all component release policy to use RWL, but it still requires some thought On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:17 AM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
Use of ReadWriterLockSlim would be best. On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Ayende Rahien <ayende@...> wrote: > all calls are ending up with release policy, which needs to do explicit > thread management to handle that safely. > it also serialize all calls to the container that end up resolving an > instance of an object. > > I change the hashtable syncronization in the all component release policy to > use RWL, but it still requires some thought > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:17 AM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote: >> >> Still need to do some clean up, enable some more tests. Bleeding-edge >> runners, please give windsor/mk a more careful evaluation. It might >> misbehave. If it does, please report it asap. >> Thanks >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > > > > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Ayende Rahien-2
::
Rate this Message:
Already committed that, but it still syncing all thread on this. Since by default this is only for pooled components, I don't think it is too bad, though. On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:01 PM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
It's for all components with decommission lifecycle steps. I'll get back to it next weekend. On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Ayende Rahien <ayende@...> wrote: > Already committed that, but it still syncing all thread on this. > Since by default this is only for pooled components, I don't think it is too > bad, though. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 5:01 PM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote: >> >> Use of ReadWriterLockSlim would be best. >> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:13 AM, Ayende Rahien <ayende@...> wrote: >> > all calls are ending up with release policy, which needs to do explicit >> > thread management to handle that safely. >> > it also serialize all calls to the container that end up resolving an >> > instance of an object. >> > >> > I change the hashtable syncronization in the all component release >> > policy to >> > use RWL, but it still requires some thought >> > >> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:17 AM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote: >> >> >> >> Still need to do some clean up, enable some more tests. Bleeding-edge >> >> runners, please give windsor/mk a more careful evaluation. It might >> >> misbehave. If it does, please report it asap. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cheers, >> >> hammett >> >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > > > > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Roelof Blom
::
Rate this Message:
From the build server's log: [echo] Detected NAnt 0.86 Beta 1, consider upgrading to a newer version when building for .NET 3.5 Not sure if this is the problem but perhaps you should consider upgrading NAnt to a recent nightly from http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/ -- Roelof. On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote:
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by Ken Egozi
::
Rate this Message:
yeah I had to go for Beta2 nightly builds when I moved to 3.5 On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Roelof Blom <roelof.blom@...> wrote:
-- Ken Egozi. http://www.kenegozi.com/blog http://www.musicglue.com http://www.castleproject.org http://www.gotfriends.co.il --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
|
|
Re: Component burden impl committed
by hammett-2
::
Rate this Message:
Ok, gonna fix that. On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:40 AM, Roelof Blom <roelof.blom@...> wrote: > From the build server's log: > [echo] Detected NAnt 0.86 Beta 1, consider upgrading to a newer version when > building for .NET 3.5 > > Not sure if this is the problem but perhaps you should consider upgrading > NAnt to a recent nightly from http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/ > > -- Roelof. > > On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 5:30 PM, hammett <hammett@...> wrote: >> >> I've changed ccnet to invoke nant with -t:net-3.5 (or something like >> that). Still failing. Any hints? >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> hammett >> http://hammett.castleproject.org/ >> >> > > > > > -- Cheers, hammett http://hammett.castleproject.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group. To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@... To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@... For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
