Concerning continuum-configuration (commons-configuration or modello ?)

[Olivier Lamy]

Hi,
I have some doubt to use commons-configuration for the continuum-configuration.
Two main issues :
- the code will be hard to read when we will had more and more
configuration keys (have a look here [1] ).
- we have two manually document the xml format.

I really prefer to use modello :
- the code will be more easy to read.
- the documentation will be auto generated.

Thoughts ? (objections ;- ) )

Thanks,
--
Olivier

[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/trunk/continuum-base/continuum-configuration/src/main/java/org/apache/continuum/configuration/DefaultContinuumConfiguration.java

[jmcconnell]

I like modello as well, so long as the versioning is worked out and
clear so version migration is simple with it :)

On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Olivier Lamy <olamy@...> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have some doubt to use commons-configuration for the continuum-configuration.
> Two main issues :
> - the code will be hard to read when we will had more and more
> configuration keys (have a look here [1] ).
> - we have two manually document the xml format.
>
> I really prefer to use modello :
> - the code will be more easy to read.
> - the documentation will be auto generated.
>
> Thoughts ? (objections ;- ) )
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Olivier
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/trunk/continuum-base/continuum-configuration/src/main/java/org/apache/continuum/configuration/DefaultContinuumConfiguration.java
>

--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@...