|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Configuring the Jetty Runtime - specifying port via Spring property placeholdersHi,
Following the wiki entry: http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jetty-configuration.html There is any example: <httpj:engine-factory bus="cxf"> ... <httpj:engine port="9001"> ... How can I make the engine *port* configurable via Spring property placeholders? I tried following: <httpj:engine port="${service.port}"> However, it doesn't work. I can understand why it doesn't work: httpj:engine is a schema extension, not a typical bean wiring stuff where property placeholders work out of the box. The question is how can I make it working so that I can configure the port via a property? Thanks! Szczepan |
|
|
Re: Configuring the Jetty Runtime - specifying port via Spring property placeholdersHi,
If you're loading the configuration yourself, you can subclass the appropriate ApplicationContext to disable validation... public class NonValidatingClassPathXmlApplicationContext extends ClassPathXmlApplicationContext { public NonValidatingClassPathXmlApplicationContext(String conf) { super(conf); } protected void initBeanDefinitionReader( XmlBeanDefinitionReader beanDefinitionReader) { super.initBeanDefinitionReader(beanDefinitionReader); beanDefinitionReader.setValidationMode(XmlBeanDefinitionReader.VALIDATION_NONE); beanDefinitionReader.setNamespaceAware(true); } } hth. Brent On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:41 AM, szczepiq <szczepiq@...> wrote: > Hi, > > Following the wiki entry: > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jetty-configuration.html > > There is any example: > > <httpj:engine-factory bus="cxf"> > ... > <httpj:engine port="9001"> > ... > > How can I make the engine *port* configurable via Spring property placeholders? > > I tried following: > > <httpj:engine port="${service.port}"> > > However, it doesn't work. I can understand why it doesn't work: > httpj:engine is a schema extension, not a typical bean wiring stuff > where property placeholders work out of the box. > > The question is how can I make it working so that I can configure the > port via a property? > > Thanks! > Szczepan > |
|
|
Re: Configuring the Jetty Runtime - specifying port via Spring property placeholdersThanks for the hint.
Although I'm not sure how this problem is related to validation. In my case ${service.port} is simply not resolved - there are no XML/bean validation errors. Cheers, Szczepan On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Brent Verner <dbv@...> wrote: > Hi, > > If you're loading the configuration yourself, you can subclass the > appropriate ApplicationContext to disable validation... > > public class NonValidatingClassPathXmlApplicationContext > extends ClassPathXmlApplicationContext { > public NonValidatingClassPathXmlApplicationContext(String conf) { > super(conf); > } > protected void initBeanDefinitionReader( XmlBeanDefinitionReader > beanDefinitionReader) { > super.initBeanDefinitionReader(beanDefinitionReader); > beanDefinitionReader.setValidationMode(XmlBeanDefinitionReader.VALIDATION_NONE); > beanDefinitionReader.setNamespaceAware(true); > } > } > > > hth. > Brent > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:41 AM, szczepiq <szczepiq@...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Following the wiki entry: >> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jetty-configuration.html >> >> There is any example: >> >> <httpj:engine-factory bus="cxf"> >> ... >> <httpj:engine port="9001"> >> ... >> >> How can I make the engine *port* configurable via Spring property placeholders? >> >> I tried following: >> >> <httpj:engine port="${service.port}"> >> >> However, it doesn't work. I can understand why it doesn't work: >> httpj:engine is a schema extension, not a typical bean wiring stuff >> where property placeholders work out of the box. >> >> The question is how can I make it working so that I can configure the >> port via a property? >> >> Thanks! >> Szczepan >> > |
|
|
Re: Configuring the Jetty Runtime - specifying port via Spring property placeholders Oh, sorry about that... Here's what I have in my spring configuration.
AFAIK, the resolution of placeholders all happens within Spring and cxf just uses the configured beans. spring config snippet: ... <bean id="agent-placeholderConfigurer" class="org.springframework.beans.factory.config.PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer"> <property name="ignoreResourceNotFound" value="true"/> <property name="localOverride" value="true" /> <property name="locations"> <list> <value>classpath:META-INF/serviceManagerAgent.properties</value> <value>classpath:serviceManagerAgent-local.properties</value> </list> </property> </bean> ... <httpj:engine port="${sma.servicePort}"> <httpj:tlsServerParametersRef id="secure" /> <httpj:threadingParameters minThreads="${sma.minThreads}" maxThreads="${sma.maxThreads}" /> <httpj:sessionSupport>true</httpj:sessionSupport> </httpj:engine> properties file: ... sma.servicePort: 19001 sma.minThreads: 5 sma.maxThreads: 25 cheers! b On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:01 AM, szczepiq <szczepiq@...> wrote: > Thanks for the hint. > > Although I'm not sure how this problem is related to validation. In my > case ${service.port} is simply not resolved - there are no XML/bean > validation errors. > > Cheers, > Szczepan > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Brent Verner <dbv@...> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> If you're loading the configuration yourself, you can subclass the >> appropriate ApplicationContext to disable validation... >> >> public class NonValidatingClassPathXmlApplicationContext >> extends ClassPathXmlApplicationContext { >> public NonValidatingClassPathXmlApplicationContext(String conf) { >> super(conf); >> } >> protected void initBeanDefinitionReader( XmlBeanDefinitionReader >> beanDefinitionReader) { >> super.initBeanDefinitionReader(beanDefinitionReader); >> beanDefinitionReader.setValidationMode(XmlBeanDefinitionReader.VALIDATION_NONE); >> beanDefinitionReader.setNamespaceAware(true); >> } >> } >> >> >> hth. >> Brent >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 8:41 AM, szczepiq <szczepiq@...> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Following the wiki entry: >>> http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jetty-configuration.html >>> >>> There is any example: >>> >>> <httpj:engine-factory bus="cxf"> >>> ... >>> <httpj:engine port="9001"> >>> ... >>> >>> How can I make the engine *port* configurable via Spring property placeholders? >>> >>> I tried following: >>> >>> <httpj:engine port="${service.port}"> >>> >>> However, it doesn't work. I can understand why it doesn't work: >>> httpj:engine is a schema extension, not a typical bean wiring stuff >>> where property placeholders work out of the box. >>> >>> The question is how can I make it working so that I can configure the >>> port via a property? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Szczepan >>> >> > |
|
|
Re: Configuring the Jetty Runtime - specifying port via Spring property placeholdersWhat version of CXF? Definitely upgrade to the latest. There was some bugs in some of our custom namespace handlers that use JAXB under the covers that wasn't allowing the properties to be injected. That was fixed a little while ago though. Dan On Tue October 20 2009 8:41:54 am szczepiq wrote: > Hi, > > Following the wiki entry: > http://cwiki.apache.org/CXF20DOC/jetty-configuration.html > > There is any example: > > <httpj:engine-factory bus="cxf"> > ... > <httpj:engine port="9001"> > ... > > How can I make the engine *port* configurable via Spring property > placeholders? > > I tried following: > > <httpj:engine port="${service.port}"> > > However, it doesn't work. I can understand why it doesn't work: > httpj:engine is a schema extension, not a typical bean wiring stuff > where property placeholders work out of the box. > > The question is how can I make it working so that I can configure the > port via a property? > > Thanks! > Szczepan > -- Daniel Kulp dkulp@... http://www.dankulp.com/blog |
|
|
Re: Configuring the Jetty Runtime - specifying port via Spring property placeholdersHi,
I'm using FUSE ESB 4.1.0.2 that I believe has CXF 2.2.2.1-fuse installed. I'm trying to achieve the same but i can not upgrade CXF . Is there another solution ? Thanks, -Marcel
|
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |