|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Contribution of Mozilla reftestsAn initial contribution of Mozilla reftests towards the CSS
2.1 test suite is contained in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0034/moztests.zip These are all in reftest format, but I've added the CSS test suite metadata to the test (but not the reference) for each, and hopefully even attributed the authorship correctly while I was doing so. The reftest.list files contain 150 == or != assertions. A few of those are actually tests that Mozilla doesn't pass. I'd give particular warning about the floats/other-float-outside* tests, which, while correct according to the current spec, I strongly believe *should* be incorrect tests, and no browser passes them. (This is issue 101 in http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1 , described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jan/0445.html .) I went through our existing tests relatively quickly to find tests to contribute; there are probably a bunch of others that we have but that have test filenames that are just bug numbers; I didn't go through any such tests to see if they were CSS 2.1 tests. There are also a number of tests that I'd like to contribute but don't yet have permission from the authors to contribute under the licenses in http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-copyright -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ |
|
|
Re: Contribution of Mozilla reftestsOn Tuesday 2009-09-15 21:06 -0700, L. David Baron wrote:
> An initial contribution of Mozilla reftests towards the CSS > 2.1 test suite is contained in: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0034/moztests.zip Here's an updated version of this archive, now with 193 test assertions. It includes a newer version of the block-inside-inline tests that I wasn't aware of, and also some border collapsing tests that I got licensing permission for after I sent the message last night. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0042/moztests.zip To be clear, these tests are provided under either of the licenses in http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-copyright -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/ |
|
|
Re: Contribution of Mozilla reftestsL. David Baron wrote:
> On Tuesday 2009-09-15 21:06 -0700, L. David Baron wrote: >> An initial contribution of Mozilla reftests towards the CSS >> 2.1 test suite is contained in: >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0034/moztests.zip > > Here's an updated version of this archive, now with 193 test > assertions. It includes a newer version of the block-inside-inline > tests that I wasn't aware of, and also some border collapsing tests > that I got licensing permission for after I sent the message last > night. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2009Sep/att-0042/moztests.zip > > To be clear, these tests are provided under either of the licenses > in http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2008/04-testsuite-copyright Ok, I've checked the tests into svn at http://test.csswg.org/svn/contributors/mozilla/incoming/reftests/ You should have access to the repository already; ping me if you've lost your password. Initial comments from a random audit: 1. 'opacity' is not a CSS2.1 property 2. HTML is not an acceptable format for CSS2.1 tests, please convert to valid XHTML (1.1 or 1.0). 3. The metadata for the table backgrounds test doesn't seem to make any sense; they're all linked to the anonymous boxes section. 4. Do you have a plan for keeping these tests in sync with Mozilla's copy? Or do you not care about that? ~fantasai |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |