|
View:
New views
5 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48108] New: Special Characters are not renderinghttps://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
Summary: Special Characters are not rendering Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: general AssignedTo: fop-dev@... ReportedBy: priyananth@... if the source XML has "~" or "→" it renders as # in the output. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
|
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48108] Special Characters are not renderinghttps://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
Jeremias Maerki <jeremias@...> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Jeremias Maerki <jeremias@...> 2009-11-02 23:45:46 UTC --- Please see the following FAQ entry: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/faq.html#pdf-characters If the font you're using doesn't have the necessary glyphs, FOP can't make them appear. You will need to select a font that has the glyphs you need. That '~' is not available is a little peculiar. That glyph is available in almost all latin fonts. However the arrow glyph is not. Maybe if you mentioned what fonts you're trying to use, it would be easier to tell exactly what's going on. Please follow up on fop-users@.... I'm fairly sure that this is no bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. |
|
|
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48108] Special Characters are not renderingOn 03.11.2009 08:45, bugzilla@... wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 [Snip] Hi Devs, I want to get an opinion: Should we start to emit error messages if there is no glyph for a character in the current font set? Of course, the user shouldn't be drowned in essentially the same message over and over again, perhaps by deferring the message to the end of processing and trying to compressing multiple missing characters to ranges or something like "mulitple characters from unicode block NNN didn't have a glyph in font ..." J.Pietschmann |
|
|
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48108] Special Characters are not renderingJ.Pietschmann wrote:
> I want to get an opinion: Should we start to emit error > messages if there is no glyph for a character in the current > font set? Of course, the user shouldn't be drowned in > essentially the same message over and over again, perhaps > by deferring the message to the end of processing and trying > to compressing multiple missing characters to ranges or > something like "mulitple characters from unicode block > NNN didn't have a glyph in font ..." +1, especially for the summary report format. ~Chris -- Chris Maden, text nerd <URL: http://crism.maden.org/ > “The State is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else.” — Frédéric Bastiat, “L’État” GnuPG Fingerprint: C6E4 E2A9 C9F8 71AC 9724 CAA3 19F8 6677 0077 C319 |
|
|
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48108] Special Characters are not renderingWe do warn about missing glyphs already in FOP Trunk but I'm sure this
can be improved. Here's some sample output: [WARN ] Glyph "?" (0x223c, similar) not available in font "Helvetica". [WARN ] Glyph "?" (0x2192, arrowright) not available in font "Helvetica". [WARN ] Glyph "?" (0x3b1, alpha) not available in font "Helvetica". [WARN ] Glyph "H" (0x48, H) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "e" (0x65, e) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "l" (0x6c, l) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "o" (0x6f, o) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "W" (0x57, W) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "r" (0x72, r) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "d" (0x64, d) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "~" (0x7e, asciitilde) not available in font "Symbol". [WARN ] Glyph "?" (0x223c, similar) not available in font "ArialMT". There's even a guard against to many such warnings per font. See Typeface.java. On 03.11.2009 21:53:17 J.Pietschmann wrote: > On 03.11.2009 08:45, bugzilla@... wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 > [Snip] > > Hi Devs, > > I want to get an opinion: Should we start to emit error > messages if there is no glyph for a character in the current > font set? Of course, the user shouldn't be drowned in > essentially the same message over and over again, perhaps > by deferring the message to the end of processing and trying > to compressing multiple missing characters to ranges or > something like "mulitple characters from unicode block > NNN didn't have a glyph in font ..." > > J.Pietschmann Jeremias Maerki |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |