|
View:
New views
15 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
|
|
Re: Digital Cameranikon D60 on 23/03/08 20:37, wrote:
> http://www.nikond60.com Nikon D60 > > Robert Thompson wrote: >> Hello All, >> I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a USB >> to >> connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work with >> Debian? Try: sudo gphoto2 --auto-detect -P -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Digital CameraOn Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Adam Hardy shared this with us all:
>--} nikon D60 on 23/03/08 20:37, wrote: >--} > http://www.nikond60.com Nikon D60 >--} > >--} > Robert Thompson wrote: >--} >> Hello All, >--} >> I also have a digital camera that I love. It is a Sony that uses a > USB --} >> to >--} >> connect to the computer. Question is: How does digital cameras work > with --} >> Debian? >--} >--} Try: >--} >--} sudo gphoto2 --auto-detect -P This might not suit but I do it this way: Plug in your camera, or have your camera plugged in when you boot: Using <blkid> as root - discover the UUID="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" of the camera and make a suitable entry into your /etc/fstab file: UUID=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx /cam vfat rw,user,noauto 0 0 Plug your camera in whenever you have photos to remove from it <mv> or <cp> them to the directory you want on your hard drive and work on them there with Gimp. HTH -- Registered Linux User:- 329524 *********************************************** You live in illusion and the appearance of things. There is a reality but you do not know this. When you understand this, you will see that you are nothing, and being nothing you are everything. That is all. ----KALU RINPOCHE *********************************************** Debian, just the best way to create magic _______________________________________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraNick Boyce <nick@...>:
> Tyler Smith wrote: > >> Robert Thompson wrote: > >> > >>> Question is: How does digital cameras work with > >>> Debian? > > > > I've found gthumb to be a pretty good place to begin > > There are doubtless also KDE apps that do the same thing, if you > > prefer. > > For KDE there is 'digiKam' : > http://www.digikam.org/about.html > http://packages.debian.org/digikam On my system (pretty much bare-metal + X), that wants to slurp in about twenty packages. gthumb wants to slurp in just about as many. :-) I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraOn Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote:
> I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This > model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? There's no exact match in digikam (current lenny) but there are some other close models to that Concord model. You might try one of those. Does that camera mount as a USB device or PTP? On the subject of cheap cameras, my first foray was a $10 key chain camera that really sucked but I managed to get it working in Linux, but I had to use gphoto2 to do it. And if the USB manufacturer ID isn't there, chances are it's not supported. The little I checked on Google for this camera, I didn't manage to see anything that said it was supported. But it has a better chance of being supported possibly because there are free "open" (so called) drivers on the Net for it. Which of course, could mean anything, like a binary wrapper claiming they gave you source code when they really didn't. >From 'gphoto2" on my system - it seems that these are the same models that digikam supports, presumably because digikam uses gphoto2 as a a backend (not sure about this). dfox@m206-157:~$ gphoto2 --list-cameras | grep Concord "Concord Eye-Q Duo" (EXPERIMENTAL) "Concord Eye-Q Easy" (EXPERIMENTAL) "Concord EyeQ 4330" (EXPERIMENTAL) "Concord EyeQMini_1" (EXPERIMENTAL) "Concord EyeQMini_2" (EXPERIMENTAL) Again, not the exact model, but this is a good starting point. Another possibility (should this not be helpful) would be to inquire on the gphoto2 mailing list. I did that before to get feedback and to help test various ways to use that cheap camera before I saw reason and got a Kodak C310 :). All this is moot IF your camera supports a removable SD card (which it seems to) since it is far easier to just get a cheap SD card reader USB attachment, and take the card out when you want to download the pictures. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraDavid Fox <dfox94085@...>:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote: > > > I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This > > model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? > > There's no exact match in digikam (current lenny) but there are some > other close models to that Concord model. You might try one of those. Tried 'em all. gtkam can't detect it using any of them. > Does that camera mount as a USB device or PTP? USB cable on PC end, looks like very small proprietary connector on camera end. I don't think it's mini-USB, but I could be wrong. > was supported. But it has a better chance of being supported possibly > because there are free "open" (so called) drivers on the Net for it. > Which of course, could mean anything, like a binary wrapper claiming > they gave you source code when they really didn't. About as useful as that Windows zip file I pulled down off their website the other night. Don't know what I'm going to do with it, but I have it. > >From 'gphoto2" on my system - it seems that these are the same models > that digikam supports, presumably because digikam uses gphoto2 as a a > backend (not sure about this). That's what I read as well. > dfox@m206-157:~$ gphoto2 --list-cameras | grep Concord > "Concord Eye-Q Duo" (EXPERIMENTAL) Same list here. > Again, not the exact model, but this is a good starting point. Another > possibility (should this not be helpful) would be to inquire on the > gphoto2 mailing list. I did that before to get feedback and to help I'll troll their archives. Thanks. > All this is moot IF your camera supports a removable SD card (which it No such luck. They put in a 2 digit LCD shot counter, though. :-P -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital Camera-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 03/25/08 19:00, s. keeling wrote: > David Fox <dfox94085@...>: >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote: >> >>> I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This >>> model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? >> There's no exact match in digikam (current lenny) but there are some >> other close models to that Concord model. You might try one of those. > > Tried 'em all. gtkam can't detect it using any of them. > >> Does that camera mount as a USB device or PTP? > > USB cable on PC end, looks like very small proprietary connector on > camera end. I don't think it's mini-USB, but I could be wrong. > >> was supported. But it has a better chance of being supported possibly >> because there are free "open" (so called) drivers on the Net for it. >> Which of course, could mean anything, like a binary wrapper claiming >> they gave you source code when they really didn't. > > About as useful as that Windows zip file I pulled down off their > website the other night. Don't know what I'm going to do with it, but > I have it. > >> >From 'gphoto2" on my system - it seems that these are the same models >> that digikam supports, presumably because digikam uses gphoto2 as a a >> backend (not sure about this). > > That's what I read as well. > >> dfox@m206-157:~$ gphoto2 --list-cameras | grep Concord >> "Concord Eye-Q Duo" (EXPERIMENTAL) > > Same list here. > >> Again, not the exact model, but this is a good starting point. Another >> possibility (should this not be helpful) would be to inquire on the >> gphoto2 mailing list. I did that before to get feedback and to help > > I'll troll their archives. Thanks. > >> All this is moot IF your camera supports a removable SD card (which it > > No such luck. They put in a 2 digit LCD shot counter, though. :-P I think I'd just try this, and see what happens: # gphoto2 --verbose --auto-detect - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH6ZbdS9HxQb37XmcRAkJFAKCeZ+/nAF5V1i9lMzi7K6SxWZR4tACeL8n0 GyUOqgXV03Dv247/voRTVvI= =o5ig -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraOn Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote:
> USB cable on PC end, looks like very small proprietary connector on > camera end. I don't think it's mini-USB, but I could be wrong. rant - I hate proprietary usb cables. I got screwed by that experience ;(. > No such luck. They put in a 2 digit LCD shot counter, though. :-P Darn. Hope you have success. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraRon Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...>:
> > On 03/25/08 19:00, s. keeling wrote: > > David Fox <dfox94085@...>: > >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote: > >> > >>> I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This > >>> model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? > >> There's no exact match in digikam (current lenny) but there are some > >> other close models to that Concord model. You might try one of those. > > > > Tried 'em all. gtkam can't detect it using any of them. > > I think I'd just try this, and see what happens: > > # gphoto2 --verbose --auto-detect (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect Model Port ---------------------------------------------------------- (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital Camera-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 On 03/26/08 07:27, s. keeling wrote: > Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...>: >> On 03/25/08 19:00, s. keeling wrote: >>> David Fox <dfox94085@...>: >>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:34 PM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've one seriously cheapo Concord Eye-Q 1000 (1.3 Mpx res.). This >>>>> model is not listed in gtkam's database. Does digiKam handle it? >>>> There's no exact match in digikam (current lenny) but there are some >>>> other close models to that Concord model. You might try one of those. >>> Tried 'em all. gtkam can't detect it using any of them. >> I think I'd just try this, and see what happens: >> >> # gphoto2 --verbose --auto-detect > > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > Model Port > ---------------------------------------------------------- > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ Buy a new camera? They're *really* cheap... - -- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson LA USA Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFH6oQrS9HxQb37XmcRAlQNAKDnEEppvBr6+WzBzGPzYJp83ymU2wCfVZG5 Ii4T9R7/S2O9AvNVs4aw5Ys= =TTHs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraOn Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:27 AM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote:
> (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > Model Port > ---------------------------------------------------------- > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ So it doesn't detect it at all, then. Bummer. Are there entries in /var/log/messages as you plug in (and unplug) the camera from the USB? Those might be of use, especially in composing a message to the gphoto2 mailing list. Pretty much, those IDs have to match perfectly or it can't be used. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraDavid Fox <dfox94085@...>:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:27 AM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote: > > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > > Model Port > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ > > So it doesn't detect it at all, then. Bummer. Are there entries in > /var/log/messages as you plug in (and unplug) the camera from the USB? tail -f syslog # unplug, then plug. I notice it had address # 6, then it gets address 7. Huh. Guess that's # udev. Mar 27 18:43:18 phreaque kernel: usb 1-1: USB disconnect, address 6 Mar 27 18:43:29 phreaque kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 7 Mar 27 18:43:29 phreaque kernel: usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice > Those might be of use, especially in composing a message to the > gphoto2 mailing list. > > Pretty much, those IDs have to match perfectly or it can't be used. There's also lsusb: (0) phreaque [root] /root_ lsusb Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 001 Device 006: ID 03e8:2186 EndPoints, Inc. Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Lots to go on it seems, but this thing will have to wait for solutions, barring what gphoto2 ml says. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraRon Johnson <ron.l.johnson@...>:
> > On 03/26/08 07:27, s. keeling wrote: > > > > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > > Model Port > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ > > Buy a new camera? They're *really* cheap... This one was free. I wouldn't be fiddling with this if somebody hadn't given it to me. I only care about what it's teaching me. I don't care about digital cameras. Besides, you get what you pay for. It's a great deal, so far. -- Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraOn Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:51:00AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> David Fox <dfox94085@...>: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:27 AM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote: > > > (1) phreaque /home/keeling_ gphoto2 --auto-detect > > > Model Port > > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ > > > > So it doesn't detect it at all, then. Bummer. Are there entries in > > /var/log/messages as you plug in (and unplug) the camera from the USB? > > tail -f syslog # unplug, then plug. I notice it had address > # 6, then it gets address 7. Huh. Guess that's > # udev. > > Mar 27 18:43:18 phreaque kernel: usb 1-1: USB disconnect, address 6 > Mar 27 18:43:29 phreaque kernel: usb 1-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 7 > Mar 27 18:43:29 phreaque kernel: usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice > > > Those might be of use, especially in composing a message to the > > gphoto2 mailing list. > > > > Pretty much, those IDs have to match perfectly or it can't be used. > > There's also lsusb: > > (0) phreaque [root] /root_ lsusb > Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > Bus 001 Device 006: ID 03e8:2186 EndPoints, Inc. > Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > > Lots to go on it seems, but this thing will have to wait for > solutions, barring what gphoto2 ml says. > > > -- > Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. > (*) http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html Linux Counter #80292 > - - http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html Please, don't Cc: me. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... > If the camera has a memory card, then try a memory card reader. I had a concord eye-Q and that is how I did the download of photos. By the way, I did not use gphoto2. I manually "mount" and "umount" the drive. With Gnome or KDE the mounting is automatically. Hope this helps. -- Alexander J.M. Debian Linux 2.6.18-6-686 i686 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
|
|
Re: Digital CameraOn Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:51 PM, s. keeling <keeling@...> wrote:
> There's also lsusb: > > (0) phreaque [root] /root_ lsusb > Bus 003 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 > Bus 001 Device 006: ID 03e8:2186 EndPoints, Inc. Most likely that's the bus ID of the camera. I tried doing a google search for that string (or just a substring) and it just shows this post, nothing else. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST@... with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@... |
| < Prev | 1 - 2 | Next > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |