|
View:
New views
4 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Directory thumbnails implementedI've recently added directory thumbnails support for Thunar file manager.
You select a file to be shown on its directory icon and ... that's it. Any file that has thumbnail will do. Like images, video, PDF documents and more. Video of how it looks is here http://aanatoly.blogspot.com/2009/11/thunar-with-directory-thumbnails.html Implementation: Whenever Thunar looks up icon for directory, it checks if image file "directory/.DirThumb" exists. If so, Thunar composes content of .DirThumb over direcory icon from current icon theme. Patch to tunar-1.0.1 is here http://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5945 -- Regards, Anatoly _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@... http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev |
|
|
Re: Directory thumbnails implementedOn Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:23, Anatoly Asviyan <aanatoly@...> wrote:
> Implementation: Whenever Thunar looks up icon for directory, it checks if > image file "directory/.DirThumb" exists. If so, Thunar composes content of > .DirThumb over direcory icon from current icon theme. Why not use the existing emblem system to associate an icon with the directory? This would require a bit more work in order to allow using arbitrary images as emblems, and allowing the size and position of the emblem to change, but it's a lot more generic and better abstracted this way. Why ".DirThumb"? Is there a relevant standard for this? If there is, why aren't you using it? If not, I'd prefer to see this standardized (and with a better naming scheme). This also makes the associated icon not themable. > Patch to tunar-1.0.1 is here Thunar 1.0.1 won't be receiving new features. New development should happen against git master, which likely has diverged a lot since 1.0.x due to the new VFS backend. -brian _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@... http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev |
|
|
Re: Directory thumbnails implemented2009/11/6 Brian J. Tarricone <bjt23@...>
Existing emblem system is not capable of it. Sorry This would require a bit more work in order to allow using Require more work from whom? From thunar dev team or casual contributor? Dear thunar developers, I did something on expense of my free time and published it. If you like it - use it. If not - ignore it. If you want thing differently - ask me or advice me. That's it. No complains. I do not get paid for writing thunar code.
Upon icon theme change thunar purges all icons from icon cache (at least it should) so it's not a problem
-- Regards, Anatoly _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@... http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev |
|
|
Re: Directory thumbnails implementedOn Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 14:22, Anatoly Asviyan <aanatoly@...> wrote:
> > > 2009/11/6 Brian J. Tarricone <bjt23@...> >> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:23, Anatoly Asviyan <aanatoly@...> wrote: >> >> > Implementation: Whenever Thunar looks up icon for directory, it checks >> > if >> > image file "directory/.DirThumb" exists. If so, Thunar composes content >> > of >> > .DirThumb over direcory icon from current icon theme. >> >> Why not use the existing emblem system to associate an icon with the >> directory? > > Existing emblem system is not capable of it. Sorry I'm well aware of that, as I hinted. >> This would require a bit more work in order to allow using >> arbitrary images as emblems, and allowing the size and position of the >> emblem to change, but it's a lot more generic and better abstracted >> this way. > > Require more work from whom? From thunar dev team or casual contributor? Well, the "casual contributor" of course. > Dear thunar developers, I did something on expense of my free time and > published it. If you like it - use it. If not - ignore it. If you want thing > differently - ask me or advice me. That's it. No complains. I do not get > paid for writing thunar code. The people who develop Thunar don't get paid either. I was merely doing *exactly* what you just asked: I think it should be done differently, so I was asking you why you did what you did, and advising you to do it another way. I'm of course not suggesting you *have* to do anything. I'm just suggesting that what you did -- while cool and useful -- probably isn't suitable for inclusion in Thunar as it is. It's up to you whether you want to do extra work to make it suitable. If your goal is to get your patch into mainline Thunar, then you'll have to do some more work. If your goal is just to write something useful to you and toss it out there, that's fine too. But you didn't at all make your goal clear from your initial email. Please don't be so defensive. You did something of value, certainly. It's up to you whether or not you want to put more work into it to increase its value. -brian _______________________________________________ Thunar-dev mailing list Thunar-dev@... http://foo-projects.org/mailman/listinfo/thunar-dev |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |