|

»

»

Disassembler makes no difference between LPM Rx, Z and LPM Rx, Z+

View: New views

3 Messages — Rating Filter: Alert me

	Disassembler makes no difference between LPM Rx, Z and LPM Rx, Z+ by Andrey Demenev :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message andrey@debian:~$ cat test2.S lpm R9, Z+ lpm R9, Z andrey@debian:~$ avr-as -mmcu=atmega8 -o test2.o test2.S andrey@debian:~$ avr-objdump -d test2.o test2.o: file format elf32-avr Disassembly of section .text: 00000000 <.text>: 0: 95 90 lpm r9, Z+ 2: 94 90 lpm r9, Z+ andrey@debian:~$ Note that assembler genarates correct code, but disassembler shows same mnemonics for different instructions _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
	Re: Disassembler makes no difference between LPM Rx, Z and LPM Rx, Z+ by Joerg Wunsch :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message Andrey Demenev <demenev@...> wrote: > Note that assembler genarates correct code, but disassembler shows > same mnemonics for different instructions Please file a bug report with the GNU binutils project then. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
	RE: Disassembler makes no difference between LPM Rx, Z and LPM Rx, Z+ by Weddington, Eric :: Rate this Message: Reply to Author \| View Threaded \| Show Only this Message > -----Original Message----- > From: > avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@... > [mailto:avr-gcc-list-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel.com@nongnu. > org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch > Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2009 12:24 AM > To: avr-gcc-list@... > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Disassembler makes no difference > between LPM Rx,Z and LPM Rx, Z+ > > Andrey Demenev <demenev@...> wrote: > > > Note that assembler genarates correct code, but disassembler shows > > same mnemonics for different instructions > > Please file a bug report with the GNU binutils project then. There's already a bug report about this on the WinAVR project. _______________________________________________ AVR-GCC-list mailing list AVR-GCC-list@... http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list