Documentation of __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS ?

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Documentation of __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS ?

by Sisyphus :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

Are there any plans to document __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS in the future ?

I've made them accessible from (the perl module) Math::GMPz, because of
their potentially useful diagnostic capabilities ... but then I've also
received a complaint about that because they're not documented
( https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=46604 ).

Knowing what (if anything) is planned in this regard might have a bearing on
how I deal with that complaint.

Cheers,
Rob

_______________________________________________
gmp-discuss mailing list
gmp-discuss@...
http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-discuss

Re: Documentation of __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS ?

by Vincent Lefevre :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

On 2009-06-02 22:01:55 +1000, Sisyphus wrote:
> Are there any plans to document __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS in the future ?
>
> I've made them accessible from (the perl module) Math::GMPz, because of
> their potentially useful diagnostic capabilities ... but then I've also
> received a complaint about that because they're not documented
> ( https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=46604 ).
>
> Knowing what (if anything) is planned in this regard might have a bearing
> onhow I deal with that complaint.

IMHO, you shouldn't have a build failure if they are not present.
In such a case, the Perl value should just be undef.

--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@...> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
_______________________________________________
gmp-discuss mailing list
gmp-discuss@...
http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-discuss

Re: Documentation of __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS ?

by Torbjorn Granlund-6 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

"Sisyphus" <sisyphus1@...> writes:

  Are there any plans to document __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS in the future ?
 
It seems like a good idea to document them.

(I think it was a mere oversight not to document them when they were
introduced.)

--
Torbjörn
_______________________________________________
gmp-discuss mailing list
gmp-discuss@...
http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-discuss

Re: Documentation of __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS ?

by Sisyphus :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


----- Original Message -----
From: "Torbjorn Granlund" <tg@...>

> > Are there any plans to document __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS in the future
> > ?
>
> It seems like a good idea to document them.

Excellent !!

Thanks, Torbjorn.

Cheers,
Rob

_______________________________________________
gmp-discuss mailing list
gmp-discuss@...
http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-discuss

Re: Documentation of __GMP_CC and __GMP_CFLAGS ?

by Sisyphus :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Lefevre" <vincent@...>

> IMHO, you shouldn't have a build failure if they are not present.
> In such a case, the Perl value should just be undef.

Yes - you're right. (Knew I was missing something ...)

I'll modify it so that is precisely what happens.

Cheers,
Rob
_______________________________________________
gmp-discuss mailing list
gmp-discuss@...
http://gmplib.org/mailman/listinfo/gmp-discuss