Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

View: New views
14 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Sutripta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi everyone,
I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read the
manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.

 If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one see/
review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the points
might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)

If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do I
control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I have
any control over which constitutes "first occurance"

Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.

Thanks in advance.

Regards
Sutripta





------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Gerhard.Lesch :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Sutripta,

Convert your data to GPS TrackMaker .GTM format.
GPS TrackMaker has the facility to search for duplicate tracks or
waypoints on a the basis of proximity.  You may them cut the selected
tracks or waypoints and paste those into a separate copy of GPS
TrackMaker.

Gerhard Lesch.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sutripta [mailto:sutripta@...]
Sent: 1 September 2009 14:31
To: gpsbabel-misc@...
Subject: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept,seeing
what is removed

Hi everyone,
I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read
the
manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.

 If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one
see/
review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the
points
might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)

If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do
I
control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I
have
any control over which constitutes "first occurance"

Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.

Thanks in advance.

Regards
Sutripta





------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and
focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Robert Lipe-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Sutripta<sutripta@...> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read the
> manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.
>
>  If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one see/
> review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the points
> might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
> given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)

It's really not a group collaboration tool that tries to figure out
"similar" and mark edits and such.   It's intended for elimination
data that's "obviously" the same.   If it decides that they're dupes
based on position and/or name, it tosses multiples.   Looking at the
code, it looks like it favors keeping one it saw first, but we don't
actually promise that behavior.


> If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do I
> control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
> command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I have
> any control over which constitutes "first occurance"

We read files in the order we see them.


> Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.

http://www.gpsbabel.org/htmldoc-development/filter_stack.html has a
couple, but I see the formatting is mangled.  I'll fix that.

RJL

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Sutripta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,
Thanks for the tip. Really powerful tool.

One problem still. Amongst duplicates, the first point of a cluster is not
listed. Any way of including that in the duplicates list?

Regards
Sutripta

----- Original Message -----
From: <Gerhard.Lesch@...>
To: <sutripta@...>; <gpsbabel-misc@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 02 September, 2009 14:30
Subject: RE: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept,seeing
what is removed


Sutripta,

Convert your data to GPS TrackMaker .GTM format.
GPS TrackMaker has the facility to search for duplicate tracks or
waypoints on a the basis of proximity.  You may them cut the selected
tracks or waypoints and paste those into a separate copy of GPS
TrackMaker.

Gerhard Lesch.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sutripta [mailto:sutripta@...]
Sent: 1 September 2009 14:31
To: gpsbabel-misc@...
Subject: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept,seeing
what is removed

Hi everyone,
I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read
the
manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.

 If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one
see/
review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the
points
might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)

If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do
I
control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I
have
any control over which constitutes "first occurance"

Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.

Thanks in advance.

Regards
Sutripta





------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and
focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Sutripta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,
Thanks for the explanation.

I know GPSBabel is in the formats conversion business only, so treat these
as request for features.

If it is possible to write two files, could you give an option outputting
both, the clean and the duplicates.
If writing to two files is not possible, could you give an option for
choosing what to output:- the clean or the dups. We can do the run twice.

Currently my workflow includes too many steps and tools. Essentially convert
to csv, and process in a spreadsheet/ database manager.

Regards
Sutripta

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Lipe" <robertlipe@...>
To: "Sutripta" <sutripta@...>
Cc: <gpsbabel-misc@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 02 September, 2009 19:47
Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing
what is removed


On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Sutripta<sutripta@...> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read the
> manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.
>
> If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one
see/
> review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the points
> might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
> given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)

It's really not a group collaboration tool that tries to figure out
"similar" and mark edits and such.   It's intended for elimination
data that's "obviously" the same.   If it decides that they're dupes
based on position and/or name, it tosses multiples.   Looking at the
code, it looks like it favors keeping one it saw first, but we don't
actually promise that behavior.


> If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do I
> control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
> command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I have
> any control over which constitutes "first occurance"

We read files in the order we see them.


> Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.

http://www.gpsbabel.org/htmldoc-development/filter_stack.html has a
couple, but I see the formatting is mangled.  I'll fix that.

RJL


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Robert Lipe-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the tip. Really powerful tool.

One problem still. Amongst duplicates, the first point of a cluster is not
listed. Any way of including that in the duplicates list?


Reproducible test case (precise command issued, version/OS of everything involved, sample inputs, etc.) welcome.

RJL



 
Regards
Sutripta

----- Original Message -----
From: <Gerhard.Lesch@...>
To: <sutripta@...>; <gpsbabel-misc@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 02 September, 2009 14:30
Subject: RE: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept,seeing
what is removed


Sutripta,

Convert your data to GPS TrackMaker .GTM format.
GPS TrackMaker has the facility to search for duplicate tracks or
waypoints on a the basis of proximity.  You may them cut the selected
tracks or waypoints and paste those into a separate copy of GPS
TrackMaker.

Gerhard Lesch.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sutripta [mailto:sutripta@...]
Sent: 1 September 2009 14:31
To: gpsbabel-misc@...
Subject: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept,seeing
what is removed

Hi everyone,
I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read
the
manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.

 If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one
see/
review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the
points
might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)

If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do
I
control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I
have
any control over which constitutes "first occurance"

Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.

Thanks in advance.

Regards
Sutripta





------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and
focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Robert Lipe-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:48 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation.

I know GPSBabel is in the formats conversion business only, so treat these
as request for features.

If it is possible to write two files, could you give an option outputting
both, the clean and the duplicates.
If writing to two files is not possible, could you give an option for
choosing what to output:- the clean or the dups. We can do the run twice.

I'd have to think about this hard (and I've been up for 20+ hours) but the stack filter might be your friend here.

Push the original
Build a filter to give the "clean"
output (and push) that to one file.
pop,merge, pop
filter, suppressing dupes.
Isn't what's left what's "dirty"?

Honestly, it's probably easier to work through that with temp files, but I'm pretty sure you can do it.

 
Currently my workflow includes too many steps and tools. Essentially convert
to csv, and process in a spreadsheet/ database manager.


At some point, you're likely to have to byte the bullet and make  a "real" database with versioned edits for the collaboration that accepts edits and merges and such.  You're just delaying that pain, it seems.

RJL

 
Regards
Sutripta

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Lipe" <robertlipe@...>
To: "Sutripta" <sutripta@...>
Cc: <gpsbabel-misc@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 02 September, 2009 19:47
Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing
what is removed


On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Sutripta<sutripta@...> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read the
> manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.
>
> If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one
see/
> review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the points
> might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
> given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)

It's really not a group collaboration tool that tries to figure out
"similar" and mark edits and such.   It's intended for elimination
data that's "obviously" the same.   If it decides that they're dupes
based on position and/or name, it tosses multiples.   Looking at the
code, it looks like it favors keeping one it saw first, but we don't
actually promise that behavior.


> If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do I
> control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
> command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I have
> any control over which constitutes "first occurance"

We read files in the order we see them.


> Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.

http://www.gpsbabel.org/htmldoc-development/filter_stack.html has a
couple, but I see the formatting is mangled.  I'll fix that.

RJL


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing what is removed

by Sutripta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

SORRY. Crossed wires! The last was a comment meant for Mr. Gerhard Lesch.
regarding GPSTrackMaker. Not GPSBabel.

Regards
Sutripta


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Lipe" <robertlipe@...>
To: "Sutripta" <sutripta@...>
Cc: <gpsbabel-misc@...>
Sent: Thursday, 03 September, 2009 11:29
Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept, seeing
what is removed


> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:40 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Thanks for the tip. Really powerful tool.
> >
> > One problem still. Amongst duplicates, the first point of a cluster is
not

> > listed. Any way of including that in the duplicates list?
> >
> >
> Reproducible test case (precise command issued, version/OS of everything
> involved, sample inputs, etc.) welcome.
>
> RJL
>
>
>
>
>
> > Regards
> > Sutripta
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Gerhard.Lesch@...>
> > To: <sutripta@...>; <gpsbabel-misc@...>
> > Sent: Wednesday, 02 September, 2009 14:30
> > Subject: RE: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is
kept,seeing

> > what is removed
> >
> >
> > Sutripta,
> >
> > Convert your data to GPS TrackMaker .GTM format.
> > GPS TrackMaker has the facility to search for duplicate tracks or
> > waypoints on a the basis of proximity.  You may them cut the selected
> > tracks or waypoints and paste those into a separate copy of GPS
> > TrackMaker.
> >
> > Gerhard Lesch.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sutripta [mailto:sutripta@...]
> > Sent: 1 September 2009 14:31
> > To: gpsbabel-misc@...
> > Subject: [Gpsbabel-misc] Duplicates:- Controlling what is kept,seeing
> > what is removed
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> > I know this sounds like a silly question from a person who hasn't read
> > the
> > manual, but even after going through it, I cant find an answer.
> >
> >  If one is using the option to remove duplicate waypoints, how does one
> > see/
> > review what has been removed. (I need to do this because though the
> > points
> > might be the same, the comments/ descriptions will not be. Waypoint list
> > given to a number of people for validating and adding comments.)
> >
> > If the all option is not being used, the first occurance is kept. How do
> > I
> > control which is the first occurance. Will listing the file first in the
> > command line do the trick? If the waypoints are in one big file, do I
> > have
> > any control over which constitutes "first occurance"
> >
> > Any detailed example on using the stack anywhere.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> > Regards
> > Sutripta
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------
> > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
> > 30-Day
> > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and
> > focus on
> > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> > Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
> > Gpsbabel-misc@...
> > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008
30-Day
> > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and
focus

> > on
> > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> > Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
> > Gpsbabel-misc@...
> > To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc
> >
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Request for feature for ver 1.3.7

by Sutripta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,
Great to see a new version coming out. The enthusiasm of the developer
community is amazing.

When doing track filtering, sometimes the program aborts with a message
stating
a) No Timestamps,
b) Badly ordered timestamps.
but no mention is made about where it has encountered the error. This is
about as useful as a compiler saying Fatal Error, Compilation aborted. but
not stating where.

Please introduce this feature. The common workaround of merging tracks does
not work with multiple (as in many people) track submissions.

Incidentally, in the new GUI, the sdistance feature is not linked to the
pack or merge option.

Regards
Sutripta


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Request for feature for ver 1.3.7

by Robert Lipe-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
Hi,
Great to see a new version coming out. The enthusiasm of the developer
community is amazing.

When doing track filtering, sometimes the program aborts with a message
stating
a) No Timestamps,
b) Badly ordered timestamps.
but no mention is made about where it has encountered the error. This is
about as useful as a compiler saying Fatal Error, Compilation aborted. but
not stating where.

Please introduce this feature. The common workaround of merging tracks does
not work with multiple (as in many people) track submissions.

In fantasy land, filters would be able to point you to the precise point in the source where the problem data originated.   We can't do that.    By the time we get to the filtering phase, we don't know where the data came from, the source format, or much else about it as everything has been decomposed to a common internal representation.  (That's sort of a cornerstone of the whole 'conversion' thing.)  We don't know preferred coordinate formats, whether the time zones were local or GMT and such.

However, I agree we can do better on these errors.   We now hock up the times (in GMT) of the offending points on a bad sort and the coords (decimal, WGS84) of points without time.

$ gpsbabel -i gpx -f vitosmt_t.gpx -x track -o gpx -F /dev/null
trackfilter-init: Track points badly ordered (timestamp 2005-06-04T23:58:26Z > 2005-06-04T00:00:00Z)!
$ gpsbabel -i gpx -f tpo-sample1.gpx -x track -o gpx -F /dev/null
trackfilter-init: Found track point at 37.520185,-122.305890 without time!

RJL

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Request for feature for ver 1.3.7

by Sutripta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Lipe" <robertlipe@...>
To: "Sutripta" <sutripta@...>
Cc: <gpsbabel-misc@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 09 September, 2009 20:20
Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] Request for feature for ver 1.3.7


> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Great to see a new version coming out. The enthusiasm of the developer
> > community is amazing.
> >
> > When doing track filtering, sometimes the program aborts with a message
> > stating
> > a) No Timestamps,
> > b) Badly ordered timestamps.
> > but no mention is made about where it has encountered the error. This is
> > about as useful as a compiler saying Fatal Error, Compilation aborted.
but
> > not stating where.
> >
> > Please introduce this feature. The common workaround of merging tracks
does
> > not work with multiple (as in many people) track submissions.
> >
>
> In fantasy land, filters would be able to point you to the precise point
in
> the source where the problem data originated.   We can't do that.    By
the
> time we get to the filtering phase, we don't know where the data came
from,
> the source format, or much else about it as everything has been decomposed
> to a common internal representation.  (That's sort of a cornerstone of the
> whole 'conversion' thing.)  We don't know preferred coordinate formats,
> whether the time zones were local or GMT and such.
Ah. Now it makes sense.
Would it be of any use to the user to use this internal format (ie
GPSBabel's p-code), for archival and postprocessing/ filtering purposes. If
so, would you give that as an option?

I know I should look at the code, but does this also mean that if the filter
options are not invoked, Babel uses another form of internal data
representation. Seems unlikely, but then all data, including trackname is
retained.

> However, I agree we can do better on these errors.   We now hock up the
> times (in GMT) of the offending points on a bad sort and the coords
> (decimal, WGS84) of points without time.
>
> $ gpsbabel -i gpx -f vitosmt_t.gpx -x track -o gpx -F /dev/null
> trackfilter-init: Track points badly ordered (timestamp
2005-06-04T23:58:26Z
> > 2005-06-04T00:00:00Z)!
> $ gpsbabel -i gpx -f tpo-sample1.gpx -x track -o gpx -F /dev/null
> trackfilter-init: Found track point at 37.520185,-122.305890 without time!
>
> RJL
>
Regards
Sutripta


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: Request for feature for ver 1.3.7

by Robert Lipe-4 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:07 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
Hi,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Lipe" <robertlipe@...>
To: "Sutripta" <sutripta@...>
Cc: <gpsbabel-misc@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 09 September, 2009 20:20
Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] Request for feature for ver 1.3.7


> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 1:38 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Great to see a new version coming out. The enthusiasm of the developer
> > community is amazing.
> >
> > When doing track filtering, sometimes the program aborts with a message
> > stating
> > a) No Timestamps,
> > b) Badly ordered timestamps.
> > but no mention is made about where it has encountered the error. This is
> > about as useful as a compiler saying Fatal Error, Compilation aborted.
but
> > not stating where.
> >
> > Please introduce this feature. The common workaround of merging tracks
does
> > not work with multiple (as in many people) track submissions.
> >
>
> In fantasy land, filters would be able to point you to the precise point
in
> the source where the problem data originated.   We can't do that.    By
the
> time we get to the filtering phase, we don't know where the data came
from,
> the source format, or much else about it as everything has been decomposed
> to a common internal representation.  (That's sort of a cornerstone of the
> whole 'conversion' thing.)  We don't know preferred coordinate formats,
> whether the time zones were local or GMT and such.
Ah. Now it makes sense.
Would it be of any use to the user to use this internal format (ie
GPSBabel's p-code), for archival and postprocessing/ filtering purposes. If
so, would you give that as an option?

It really doesn't make sense as this internal representation is just a data structure and not really a file format.

I know I should look at the code, but does this also mean that if the filter
options are not invoked, Babel uses another form of internal data
representation. Seems unlikely, but then all data, including trackname is
retained.

We use an internal representation for all waypoint/track/route data.  A filter or output module really doesn't know whence a position came.     So the change I  committed is the best we can do for a reasonable cost.

RJL




 
> However, I agree we can do better on these errors.   We now hock up the
> times (in GMT) of the offending points on a bad sort and the coords
> (decimal, WGS84) of points without time.
>
> $ gpsbabel -i gpx -f vitosmt_t.gpx -x track -o gpx -F /dev/null
> trackfilter-init: Track points badly ordered (timestamp
2005-06-04T23:58:26Z
> > 2005-06-04T00:00:00Z)!
> $ gpsbabel -i gpx -f tpo-sample1.gpx -x track -o gpx -F /dev/null
> trackfilter-init: Found track point at 37.520185,-122.305890 without time!
>
> RJL
>
Regards
Sutripta


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Parent Message unknown sdistance GUI bug in ver 1.3.7

by Sutripta :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,
Latest dev ver ( 1.3.7-beta20091003) still has this problem.
If there is a non zero value in sdistance box, sdistance makes its way into
the command line, even if split is unchecked. Also, amongst pack, merge,
split, split time value, and split distance value, their interaction in the
gui is not entirely logical.

Also, will it be possible to introduce a split by time OR split by distance
option. Currently, one can only AND these.

Regards
Sutripta

----- Original Message -----
From: "Khai Mong" <khai@...>
To: "Sutripta" <sutripta@...>; "Robert Lipe" <robertlipe@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 09 September, 2009 16:49
Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] Request for feature for ver 1.3.7


> Robert,
>
> I'll take care of the following problem:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Incidentally, in the new GUI, the sdistance feature is not linked to the
> > pack or merge option.
> >
> >
>


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc

Re: sdistance GUI bug in ver 1.3.7

by Khai Mong :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

They now reflect they way the command line works.

The "split" checkbox in the UI refers only to the split by time.  It corresponds to the "-split" on the command line.

The command line option "sdistance" parameters is reflected by the distance parameter field in the GUI.  The "sdistance" parameter is not directly related to the "split" on the command line.

I  agree that the UI can be more intuitive.  I'll see what I can cookup without increasing the clutter.

Khai


The split by

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
Hi,
Latest dev ver ( 1.3.7-beta20091003) still has this problem.
If there is a non zero value in sdistance box, sdistance makes its way into
the command line, even if split is unchecked. Also, amongst pack, merge,
split, split time value, and split distance value, their interaction in the
gui is not entirely logical.

Also, will it be possible to introduce a split by time OR split by distance
option. Currently, one can only AND these.

Regards
Sutripta

----- Original Message -----
From: "Khai Mong" <khai@...>
To: "Sutripta" <sutripta@...>; "Robert Lipe" <robertlipe@...>
Sent: Wednesday, 09 September, 2009 16:49
Subject: Re: [Gpsbabel-misc] Request for feature for ver 1.3.7


> Robert,
>
> I'll take care of the following problem:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Sutripta <sutripta@...> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Incidentally, in the new GUI, the sdistance feature is not linked to the
> > pack or merge option.
> >
> >
>



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Gpsbabel-misc mailing list http://www.gpsbabel.org
Gpsbabel-misc@...
To unsubscribe, change list options, or see archives, visit:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gpsbabel-misc