Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

[Mark-429]

Hi,

I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
be gentle ;-).

I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).

However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).

So my questions are:
Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
kept in synch with main code base)?
Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?

I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
going...?).

And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
produce - Thanks!

Thanks

Mark

The patch I produced is here:
http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Jonathon Rossi]

There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last time I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot of trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests running later.

We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our users for thanks for the patch.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

Hi,

I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
be gentle ;-).

I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).

However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).

So my questions are:
Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
kept in synch with main code base)?
Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?

I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
going...?).

And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
produce - Thanks!

Thanks

Mark

The patch I produced is here:
http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip

--
Jono

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Mark-429]

Thanks Jono,

Anything I can do to help?

On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:

> There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last time
> I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot of
> trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests running
> later.
>
> We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> users for thanks for the patch.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> > be gentle ;-).
>
> > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> > So my questions are:
> > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> > kept in synch with main code base)?
> > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> > going...?).
>
> > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> > produce - Thanks!
>
> > Thanks
>
> > Mark
>
> > The patch I produced is here:
> >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> --
> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Jonathon Rossi]

There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

Thanks Jono,

Anything I can do to help?

On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last time
> I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot of
> trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests running
> later.
>
> We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> users for thanks for the patch.
>
>
>
>
>

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> > be gentle ;-).
>
> > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> > So my questions are:
> > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> > kept in synch with main code base)?
> > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> > going...?).
>
> > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> > produce - Thanks!
>
> > Thanks
>
> > Mark
>
> > The patch I produced is here:
> >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> --

> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Jono

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[DAVIS, Peter]

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

The current silverlight projects are incorrect. I tried to build a silverlight version of Windsor and DP just last week, and hit a large wall and decided to give up.

 

The main issues were:

 

1)      I found that the *.Silverlight.csproj files are still referencing System.dll, System.Core.dll, and mscorelib.dll from the .NET framework path. These should be linking to those in the silverlight SDK folder (something line C:\program files\microsoft sdks\silverlight\2.0…)

2)      After fixing (1) I found some issues with classes that didn’t make it into silverlight 2.0 ( mainly the HybridDictionary). See the Silverlight 2.0 documentation for the System.Collections.Specialized namespace, only a few interfaces made it.

 

I looks like the best solution to make Castle.Core, Castle.MicroKernal, and Castle.Windsor source compatible with Silverlight 2.0 is to swap

HybridDictionary(true)

For

                Dictionary<string, object>(StringComparrison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)

 

Or specific types, like in AbstractHandler.cs

                Dictionary<string, DependencyModel>(StringComparrison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)

 

Since Dictionary<K,V> implements IDictionary, I found that this didn’t break the interfaces, and therefore is largely backwards compatible.

 

Also I found a combination of dictionaries where some ignore case, and some don’t.

 

After finding out the level of required change to make it compile for silverlight I gave up, and resorted to using the silverlight build of unity. I don’t know if there are other Classes that are being used in the .NET Framework that are not in Silverlight other than the HybridDictionary, but it wont take long to find out.

Cheers,

Peter Davis
Software Engineer, EW Operational Support Group
BAE Systems Australia
Phone [phone]

If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the process of putting them in.

---

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 9:54 AM
To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

Thanks Jono,

Anything I can do to help?

On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last time
> I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot of
> trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests running
> later.
>
> We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> users for thanks for the patch.
>
>
>
>
>

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> > be gentle ;-).
>
> > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> > So my questions are:
> > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> > kept in synch with main code base)?
> > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> > going...?).
>
> > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> > produce - Thanks!
>
> > Thanks
>
> > Mark
>
> > The patch I produced is here:
> >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> --

> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

 

--
Jono

"Warning:
The information contained in this email and any attached files is
confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
attachments is expressly prohibited.  If you have received this email
in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
sender's responsibility.  It is your responsibility to ensure virus
checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
your computer."

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Krzysztof Koźmic]

Davis,

Could you provide a patch (or several) for that.
It would be best if you created an issue in Donjon and attached patches there.
Thanks,

Krzysztof

2009/6/15 DAVIS, Peter <peter.davis2@...>:

> The current silverlight projects are incorrect. I tried to build a
> silverlight version of Windsor and DP just last week, and hit a large wall
> and decided to give up.
>
>
>
> The main issues were:
>
>
>
> 1)      I found that the *.Silverlight.csproj files are still referencing
> System.dll, System.Core.dll, and mscorelib.dll from the .NET framework path.
> These should be linking to those in the silverlight SDK folder (something
> line C:\program files\microsoft sdks\silverlight\2.0…)
>
> 2)      After fixing (1) I found some issues with classes that didn’t make
> it into silverlight 2.0 ( mainly the HybridDictionary). See the Silverlight
> 2.0 documentation for the System.Collections.Specialized namespace, only a
> few interfaces made it.
>
>
>
> I looks like the best solution to make Castle.Core, Castle.MicroKernal, and
> Castle.Windsor source compatible with Silverlight 2.0 is to swap
>
> HybridDictionary(true)
>
> For
>
>                 Dictionary<string,
> object>(StringComparrison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
>
>
>
> Or specific types, like in AbstractHandler.cs
>
>                 Dictionary<string,
> DependencyModel>(StringComparrison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
>
>
>
> Since Dictionary<K,V> implements IDictionary, I found that this didn’t break
> the interfaces, and therefore is largely backwards compatible.
>
>
>
> Also I found a combination of dictionaries where some ignore case, and some
> don’t.
>
>
>
> After finding out the level of required change to make it compile for
> silverlight I gave up, and resorted to using the silverlight build of unity.
> I don’t know if there are other Classes that are being used in the .NET
> Framework that are not in Silverlight other than the HybridDictionary, but
> it wont take long to find out.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter Davis
> Software Engineer, EW Operational Support Group
> BAE Systems Australia
> Phone [phone]
>
> If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the
> process of putting them in.
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: castle-project-devel@...
> [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
> Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 9:54 AM
> To: castle-project-devel@...
> Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build
>
>
>
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jono,
>
> Anything I can do to help?
>
> On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
>> There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last
>> time
>> I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot
>> of
>> trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
>> planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests running
>> later.
>>
>> We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
>> aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
>> build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
>> users for thanks for the patch.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>>
>> > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
>> > be gentle ;-).
>>
>> > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
>> > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
>> > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>>
>> > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
>> > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
>> > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
>> > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>>
>> > So my questions are:
>> > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
>> > kept in synch with main code base)?
>> > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>>
>> > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
>> > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
>> > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
>> > going...?).
>>
>> > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
>> > produce - Thanks!
>>
>> > Thanks
>>
>> > Mark
>>
>> > The patch I produced is here:
>> >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>>
>> --
>
>> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jono
>
> "Warning:
> The information contained in this email and any attached files is
> confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
> attachments is expressly prohibited.  If you have received this email
> in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
> taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
> however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
> sender's responsibility.  It is your responsibility to ensure virus
> checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
> your computer."
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Pete-124]

Yeah no worries mate,

I will have a look at the issue again tonight and raise the issue on
Donjon.

Pete

On Jun 15, 3:01 pm, Krzysztof Koźmic <krzysztof.koz...@...>
wrote:

> Davis,
>
> Could you provide a patch (or several) for that.
> It would be best if you created an issue in Donjon and attached patches there.
> Thanks,
>
> Krzysztof
>
> 2009/6/15 DAVIS, Peter <peter.dav...@...>:
>
>
>
> > The current silverlight projects are incorrect. I tried to build a
> > silverlight version of Windsor and DP just last week, and hit a large wall
> > and decided to give up.
>
> > The main issues were:
>
> > 1)      I found that the *.Silverlight.csproj files are still referencing
> > System.dll, System.Core.dll, and mscorelib.dll from the .NET framework path.
> > These should be linking to those in the silverlight SDK folder (something
> > line C:\program files\microsoft sdks\silverlight\2.0...)
>
> > 2)      After fixing (1) I found some issues with classes that didn't make
> > it into silverlight 2.0 ( mainly the HybridDictionary). See the Silverlight
> > 2.0 documentation for the System.Collections.Specialized namespace, only a
> > few interfaces made it.
>
> > I looks like the best solution to make Castle.Core, Castle.MicroKernal, and
> > Castle.Windsor source compatible with Silverlight 2.0 is to swap
>
> > HybridDictionary(true)
>
> > For
>
> >                 Dictionary<string,
> > object>(StringComparrison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
>
> > Or specific types, like in AbstractHandler.cs
>
> >                 Dictionary<string,
> > DependencyModel>(StringComparrison.OrdinalIgnoreCase)
>
> > Since Dictionary<K,V> implements IDictionary, I found that this didn't break
> > the interfaces, and therefore is largely backwards compatible.
>
> > Also I found a combination of dictionaries where some ignore case, and some
> > don't.
>
> > After finding out the level of required change to make it compile for
> > silverlight I gave up, and resorted to using the silverlight build of unity.
> > I don't know if there are other Classes that are being used in the .NET
> > Framework that are not in Silverlight other than the HybridDictionary, but
> > it wont take long to find out.
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Peter Davis
> > Software Engineer, EW Operational Support Group
> > BAE Systems Australia
> > Phone [phone]
>
> > If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the
> > process of putting them in.
>
> > ________________________________
>
> > From: castle-project-devel@...
> > [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
> > Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 9:54 AM
> > To: castle-project-devel@...
> > Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build
>
> > There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> > really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.
>
> > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jono,
>
> > Anything I can do to help?
>
> > On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> >> There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last
> >> time
> >> I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot
> >> of
> >> trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> >> planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests running
> >> later.
>
> >> We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> >> aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> >> build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> >> users for thanks for the patch.
>
> >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> >> > Hi,
>
> >> > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> >> > be gentle ;-).
>
> >> > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> >> > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> >> > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> >> > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> >> > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> >> > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> >> > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> >> > So my questions are:
> >> > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> >> > kept in synch with main code base)?
> >> > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> >> > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> >> > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> >> > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> >> > going...?).
>
> >> > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> >> > produce - Thanks!
>
> >> > Thanks
>
> >> > Mark
>
> >> > The patch I produced is here:
> >> >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> >> --
>
> >> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Jono
>
> > "Warning:
> > The information contained in this email and any attached files is
> > confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
> > recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
> > attachments is expressly prohibited.  If you have received this email
> > in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
> > taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
> > however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
> > sender's responsibility.  It is your responsibility to ensure virus
> > checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
> > your computer."- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Mark-429]

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:

> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jono,
>
> > Anything I can do to help?
>
> > On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> > > There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last
> > time
> > > I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot
> > of
> > > trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> > > planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests
> > running
> > > later.
>
> > > We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> > > aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> > > build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> > > users for thanks for the patch.
>
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> > > > be gentle ;-).
>
> > > > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> > > > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> > > > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> > > > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> > > > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> > > > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> > > > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> > > > So my questions are:
> > > > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> > > > kept in synch with main code base)?
> > > > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> > > > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> > > > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> > > > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> > > > going...?).
>
> > > > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> > > > produce - Thanks!
>
> > > > Thanks
>
> > > > Mark
>
> > > > The patch I produced is here:
> > > >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> > > --
> > > Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Jonathon Rossi]

Sure, no problem.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.
>
>
>
>
>

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jono,
>
> > Anything I can do to help?
>
> > On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> > > There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last
> > time
> > > I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot
> > of
> > > trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> > > planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests
> > running
> > > later.
>
> > > We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> > > aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> > > build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> > > users for thanks for the patch.
>
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> > > > be gentle ;-).
>
> > > > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> > > > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> > > > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> > > > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> > > > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> > > > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> > > > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> > > > So my questions are:
> > > > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> > > > kept in synch with main code base)?
> > > > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> > > > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> > > > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> > > > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> > > > going...?).
>
> > > > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> > > > produce - Thanks!
>
> > > > Thanks
>
> > > > Mark
>
> > > > The patch I produced is here:
> > > >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> > > --
> > > Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Jono

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[DAVIS, Peter]

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

Once the patches attached in this issue are resolved, then core will compile straight from svn.

 

http://support.castleproject.org/projects/CORE/issues/view/CORE-ISSUE-23

 

I have not looked at DP yet, but at least that project is correctly linked to silverlight assemblies, unlike micro kernel and Windsor.

 

Pete

 

---

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 6:36 PM
To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

Sure, no problem.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.
>
>
>
>
>

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jono,
>
> > Anything I can do to help?
>
> > On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> > > There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last
> > time
> > > I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot
> > of
> > > trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> > > planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests
> > running
> > > later.
>
> > > We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> > > aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> > > build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> > > users for thanks for the patch.
>
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> > > > be gentle ;-).
>
> > > > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> > > > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> > > > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> > > > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> > > > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> > > > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> > > > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> > > > So my questions are:
> > > > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> > > > kept in synch with main code base)?
> > > > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> > > > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> > > > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> > > > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> > > > going...?).
>
> > > > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> > > > produce - Thanks!
>
> > > > Thanks
>
> > > > Mark
>
> > > > The patch I produced is here:
> > > >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> > > --
> > > Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Jono

"Warning:
The information contained in this email and any attached files is
confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
attachments is expressly prohibited.  If you have received this email
in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
sender's responsibility.  It is your responsibility to ensure virus
checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
your computer."

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Roelof Blom]

The patch has been applied in r5776, thanks.

Also, DP for SL compiles again from r5778 onwards.

-- Roelof.

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:13 AM, DAVIS, Peter <peter.davis2@...> wrote:

Once the patches attached in this issue are resolved, then core will compile straight from svn.

 

http://support.castleproject.org/projects/CORE/issues/view/CORE-ISSUE-23

 

I have not looked at DP yet, but at least that project is correctly linked to silverlight assemblies, unlike micro kernel and Windsor.

 

Pete

 

---

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 6:36 PM

To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

Sure, no problem.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.
>
>
>
>
>

> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jono,
>
> > Anything I can do to help?
>
> > On Jun 15, 12:10 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> > > There is plans to set up a Silverlight build on TeamCity, however last
> > time
> > > I had an attempt at getting it all building with Silverlight I had a lot
> > of
> > > trouble with unit tests. I still have my working copy from then so I'm
> > > planning to just get it building and worry about getting the tests
> > running
> > > later.
>
> > > We haven't yet had an official Silverlight supported release and I'm not
> > > aware of any committers that are pushing to keep it up to date, but a CI
> > > build will ensure that happens. However, we do want to support it for our
> > > users for thanks for the patch.
>
> > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Mark <markspambus...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I've just signed up and don't know much about how everything works so
> > > > be gentle ;-).
>
> > > > I have used RhinoMocks for quite a while and now I've started using it
> > > > with Silverlight. RhinoMocks uses Dynamic Proxy and the other day I
> > > > found a bug which I raised and was fixed almost immediately (awsome!).
>
> > > > However, it appears that the Silverlight version isn't being built
> > > > automatically and when I got the source and tried to build it took a
> > > > bit of rearranging for the code to compile and so I'm a little worried
> > > > that I may have broken something in the process (link to patch below).
>
> > > > So my questions are:
> > > > Is the Silverlight version being actively "developed" (well, actively
> > > > kept in synch with main code base)?
> > > > Is there a build for the Silverlight version? If not can we get one?
>
> > > > I don't have any "spare" time but could probably convince my boss that
> > > > an hour or 2 getting this in place will be worth it for us in the long
> > > > run (and hopefully there wouldn't be too much time to keep t
> > > > going...?).
>
> > > > And finally a general "you guys are awesome" for the libraries you
> > > > produce - Thanks!
>
> > > > Thanks
>
> > > > Mark
>
> > > > The patch I produced is here:
> > > >http://www.walkersretreat.co.nz/files/DYNPROX-92-Silverlight.zip
>
> > > --
> > > Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Jono- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Jono

"Warning:
The information contained in this email and any attached files is
confidential to BAE Systems Australia. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this email or any
attachments is expressly prohibited.  If you have received this email
in error, please notify us immediately. VIRUS: Every care has been
taken to ensure this email and its attachments are virus free,
however, any loss or damage incurred in using this email is not the
sender's responsibility.  It is your responsibility to ensure virus
checks are completed before installing any data sent in this email to
your computer."

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Mark-429]

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

I just updated to latest version (r5779). When I open \Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\DynamicProxy2-Silverlight.sln I get a message saying a project (\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy.Silverlight.Tests\Castle.DynamicProxy2.Silverlight.Tests.csproj) can’t be found (and I can’t find that project ion source anywhere).

 

Also when I try to compile I get 6 errors all relating to 'UpgradableLock' being missing e.g.

 

Error   11      The type or namespace name 'UpgradableLock' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)          E:\DevPlay\Castle\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy\InternalsHelper.cs        33      11          DynamicProxy2-Silverlight

 

 

 

Am I doing something wrong?

 

Thanks

 

Mark

 

 

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Roelof Blom
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 3:10 a.m.
To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

The patch has been applied in r5776, thanks.

Also, DP for SL compiles again from r5778 onwards.

-- Roelof.

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:13 AM, DAVIS, Peter <peter.davis2@...> wrote:

Once the patches attached in this issue are resolved, then core will compile straight from svn.

 

http://support.castleproject.org/projects/CORE/issues/view/CORE-ISSUE-23

 

I have not looked at DP yet, but at least that project is correctly linked to silverlight assemblies, unlike micro kernel and Windsor.

 

Pete

 

---

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 6:36 PM

To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

Sure, no problem.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Mark-429]

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

So to get \Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\DynamicProxy2-Silverlight.sln to compile I only have to add in the missing 'UpgradableLock.cs' class (as per attached patch).

 

However, the tests folder is missing so I get an error when opening the solution because this project is missing:

 

\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy.Silverlight.Tests\Castle.DynamicProxy2.Silverlight.Tests.csproj

 

 

Can someone add that folder to SVN?

 

Otherwise it’s going to be difficult to get the tests passing ;-).

Thanks

 

Mark

 

 

From: Mark [mailto:MarkSpamBuster@...]
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 8:18 a.m.
To: 'castle-project-devel@...'
Subject: RE: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

I just updated to latest version (r5779). When I open \Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\DynamicProxy2-Silverlight.sln I get a message saying a project (\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy.Silverlight.Tests\Castle.DynamicProxy2.Silverlight.Tests.csproj) can’t be found (and I can’t find that project ion source anywhere).

 

Also when I try to compile I get 6 errors all relating to 'UpgradableLock' being missing e.g.

 

Error   11      The type or namespace name 'UpgradableLock' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)          E:\DevPlay\Castle\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy\InternalsHelper.cs        33      11          DynamicProxy2-Silverlight

 

 

 

Am I doing something wrong?

 

Thanks

 

Mark

 

 

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Roelof Blom
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 3:10 a.m.
To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

The patch has been applied in r5776, thanks.

Also, DP for SL compiles again from r5778 onwards.

-- Roelof.

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:13 AM, DAVIS, Peter <peter.davis2@...> wrote:

Once the patches attached in this issue are resolved, then core will compile straight from svn.

 

http://support.castleproject.org/projects/CORE/issues/view/CORE-ISSUE-23

 

I have not looked at DP yet, but at least that project is correctly linked to silverlight assemblies, unlike micro kernel and Windsor.

 

Pete

 

---

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 6:36 PM

To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

Sure, no problem.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Roelof Blom]

Thanks for the patch.

In r5782 the DP/SL unit test has been commited, it seems that this project has never been added to SVN, see r5493.

See also this mailing list thread: http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/54f25b1c49f2f110/ba01b243533f263e

-- Roelof.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

So to get \Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\DynamicProxy2-Silverlight.sln to compile I only have to add in the missing 'UpgradableLock.cs' class (as per attached patch).

 

However, the tests folder is missing so I get an error when opening the solution because this project is missing:

 

\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy.Silverlight.Tests\Castle.DynamicProxy2.Silverlight.Tests.csproj

 

 

Can someone add that folder to SVN?

 

Otherwise it’s going to be difficult to get the tests passing ;-).

Thanks

 

Mark

 

 

From: Mark [mailto:MarkSpamBuster@...]
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 8:18 a.m.

To: 'castle-project-devel@...'

Subject: RE: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

I just updated to latest version (r5779). When I open \Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\DynamicProxy2-Silverlight.sln I get a message saying a project (\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy.Silverlight.Tests\Castle.DynamicProxy2.Silverlight.Tests.csproj) can’t be found (and I can’t find that project ion source anywhere).

 

Also when I try to compile I get 6 errors all relating to 'UpgradableLock' being missing e.g.

 

Error   11      The type or namespace name 'UpgradableLock' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)          E:\DevPlay\Castle\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy\InternalsHelper.cs        33      11          DynamicProxy2-Silverlight

 

 

 

Am I doing something wrong?

 

Thanks

 

Mark

 

 

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Roelof Blom

Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 3:10 a.m.

To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

The patch has been applied in r5776, thanks.

Also, DP for SL compiles again from r5778 onwards.

-- Roelof.

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:13 AM, DAVIS, Peter <peter.davis2@...> wrote:

Once the patches attached in this issue are resolved, then core will compile straight from svn.

 

http://support.castleproject.org/projects/CORE/issues/view/CORE-ISSUE-23

 

I have not looked at DP yet, but at least that project is correctly linked to silverlight assemblies, unlike micro kernel and Windsor.

 

Pete

 

---

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 6:36 PM

To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

Sure, no problem.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

[Mark-429]

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

Cool, I’ll take a look when I can – probably next week. I’ve skimmed the thread you sent and it looks very relevant will look again when I’m not so tired.

 

Thanks

 

Mark

 

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Roelof Blom
Sent: Friday, 19 June 2009 9:22 p.m.
To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

Thanks for the patch.

In r5782 the DP/SL unit test has been commited, it seems that this project has never been added to SVN, see r5493.

See also this mailing list thread: http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel/browse_thread/thread/54f25b1c49f2f110/ba01b243533f263e

-- Roelof.

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

So to get \Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\DynamicProxy2-Silverlight.sln to compile I only have to add in the missing 'UpgradableLock.cs' class (as per attached patch).

 

However, the tests folder is missing so I get an error when opening the solution because this project is missing:

 

\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy.Silverlight.Tests\Castle.DynamicProxy2.Silverlight.Tests.csproj

 

 

Can someone add that folder to SVN?

 

Otherwise it’s going to be difficult to get the tests passing ;-).

Thanks

 

Mark

 

 

From: Mark [mailto:MarkSpamBuster@...]
Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 8:18 a.m.

To: 'castle-project-devel@...'

Subject: RE: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

I just updated to latest version (r5779). When I open \Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\DynamicProxy2-Silverlight.sln I get a message saying a project (\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy.Silverlight.Tests\Castle.DynamicProxy2.Silverlight.Tests.csproj) can’t be found (and I can’t find that project ion source anywhere).

 

Also when I try to compile I get 6 errors all relating to 'UpgradableLock' being missing e.g.

 

Error   11      The type or namespace name 'UpgradableLock' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)          E:\DevPlay\Castle\Tools\Castle.DynamicProxy2\Castle.DynamicProxy\InternalsHelper.cs        33      11          DynamicProxy2-Silverlight

 

 

 

Am I doing something wrong?

 

Thanks

 

Mark

 

 

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Roelof Blom

Sent: Thursday, 18 June 2009 3:10 a.m.

To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

The patch has been applied in r5776, thanks.

Also, DP for SL compiles again from r5778 onwards.

-- Roelof.

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:13 AM, DAVIS, Peter <peter.davis2@...> wrote:

Once the patches attached in this issue are resolved, then core will compile straight from svn.

 

http://support.castleproject.org/projects/CORE/issues/view/CORE-ISSUE-23

 

I have not looked at DP yet, but at least that project is correctly linked to silverlight assemblies, unlike micro kernel and Windsor.

 

Pete

 

---

From: castle-project-devel@... [mailto:castle-project-devel@...] On Behalf Of Jonathon Rossi
Sent: Monday, 15 June 2009 6:36 PM

To: castle-project-devel@...
Subject: Re: Dynamic Proxy - Silverlight Build

 

Sure, no problem.

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Mark <markspambuster@...> wrote:

This may be a bit chicken-and-egg but I'd rather not go fixing unit
tests until I was sure the code was in the correct state (which I'm
not sure mine is).
Can you let me know when the code compiles straight from SVN? I'll
take a look at the tests then.

Cheers

Mark

On Jun 15, 12:24 pm, Jonathon Rossi <j...@...> wrote:
> There are many unit tests that aren't successful on silverlight. It would be
> really helpful if we can get these fixed in both Castle Core and DP2.

 

 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Castle Project Development List" group.
To post to this group, send email to castle-project-devel@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to castle-project-devel+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/castle-project-devel?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---