Editorial correction for RPC Signature

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Editorial correction for RPC Signature

by John Kaputin (gmail) :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I hope this editorial correction can still be made to the spec before PR.

Part 2 Section 4.1.2 "XML Representation of the wrpc:signature Extension" contains the text:

"The type of the name attribute information item is a list type ..."

I think the word 'name' is wrong. It should say:

"The type of the signature attribute information item is a list type ..."

regards,
John Kaputin

RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature

by Jonathan Marsh-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

If not (up to Philippe I guess), then I see no harm in making this kind of purely editorial correction when we issue the final Rec.

 

New bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4562

 

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

From: www-ws-desc-request@... [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@...] On Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail)
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 5:42 AM
To: WS-Description WG
Subject: Editorial correction for RPC Signature

 

I hope this editorial correction can still be made to the spec before PR.

Part 2 Section 4.1.2 "XML Representation of the wrpc:signature Extension" contains the text:

"The type of the name attribute information item is a list type ..."

I think the word 'name' is wrong. It should say:

"The type of the signature attribute information item is a list type ..."

regards,
John Kaputin


RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature

by Rogers, Tony :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.
I agree - this is not a substantive change, just a minor correction. But up to Philippe to give us the yay/nay on process.
 
Tony Rogers
 


From: www-ws-desc-request@... [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@...] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Thursday, 17 May 2007 10:30
To: 'John Kaputin (gmail)'; 'WS-Description WG'
Subject: RE: Editorial correction for RPC Signature

If not (up to Philippe I guess), then I see no harm in making this kind of purely editorial correction when we issue the final Rec.

 

New bug: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4562

 

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com

 

From: www-ws-desc-request@... [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@...] On Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail)
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 5:42 AM
To: WS-Description WG
Subject: Editorial correction for RPC Signature

 

I hope this editorial correction can still be made to the spec before PR.

Part 2 Section 4.1.2 "XML Representation of the wrpc:signature Extension" contains the text:

"The type of the name attribute information item is a list type ..."

I think the word 'name' is wrong. It should say:

"The type of the signature attribute information item is a list type ..."

regards,
John Kaputin