Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

View: New views
17 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Damien Sandras :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Hi,

I have run Ekiga trunk today. I had not done so for a long time due to
bugfixing in the stable branch.

I noticed the following bugs :
- latency to the echo test is high, it reaches 160ms when the girl stops
talking
- CPU usage is high : 30% without video (audio only)
- Presence is broken

Can you confirm you also see those problems ?
Can you confirm 3.2.x is not affected ?

Thanks,
--
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras@...
                       

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Julien PUYDT :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damien Sandras a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have run Ekiga trunk today. I had not done so for a long time due to
> bugfixing in the stable branch.
>
> I noticed the following bugs :
> - latency to the echo test is high, it reaches 160ms when the girl stops
> talking

No clue.

> - CPU usage is high : 30% without video (audio only)

No clue.

> - Presence is broken

Yes -- at least partially.

> Can you confirm you also see those problems ?

I can confirm one of them.

Snark
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Yannick-GNU/Linux :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Julien Puydt a écrit :
> Damien Sandras a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have run Ekiga trunk today. I had not done so for a long time due to
>> bugfixing in the stable branch.
>>
>> I noticed the following bugs :
>> - latency to the echo test is high, it reaches 160ms when the girl stops
>> talking

Using stable branch from 9 sept.

I have almost the same latency, but my inet connection sucks today, thus
i'm not sure it is due to ekiga...

>
> No clue.
>
>> - CPU usage is high : 30% without video (audio only)
>
> No clue.

Seems there is an issue here too using stable branch:
on intel atom (1.6 MHz), CPU run at 50%, i.e. 800 Hz and top says for
calling 500: ~65% audio + video and 55% audio only. I have hard time
believing audio (PCM) use using CPU approx. 5 times more than video (H261)

>
>> - Presence is broken

On stable branch I do not think so...

>
> Yes -- at least partially.
>
>> Can you confirm you also see those problems ?
>
> I can confirm one of them.
>
> Snark
> _______________________________________________
> Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
> Ekiga-devel-list@...
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list
>
>

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Eugen Dedu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damien Sandras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have run Ekiga trunk today. I had not done so for a long time due to
> bugfixing in the stable branch.

The same for me, I wait the new stable release to build the unstable
again...

> I noticed the following bugs :
> - latency to the echo test is high, it reaches 160ms when the girl stops
> talking

Between 90 and 180 on stable and with wi-fi connection, as shown by
Jitter bufferon the status bar.

> - CPU usage is high : 30% without video (audio only)

On stable, I have about 15% with video.

> - Presence is broken

It works on stable.

> Can you confirm you also see those problems ?
> Can you confirm 3.2.x is not affected ?
>
> Thanks,


--
Eugen
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Eugen Dedu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

yannick wrote:

> Julien Puydt a écrit :
>> Damien Sandras a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> - CPU usage is high : 30% without video (audio only)
>> No clue.
>
> Seems there is an issue here too using stable branch:
> on intel atom (1.6 MHz), CPU run at 50%, i.e. 800 Hz and top says for
> calling 500: ~65% audio + video and 55% audio only. I have hard time
> believing audio (PCM) use using CPU approx. 5 times more than video (H261)

Hoping we can fix it soon after the next stable release, there is also
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=581019

--
Eugen
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Julien PUYDT :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damien Sandras a écrit :
< a list of problems>

You forgot on shutdown :
       assert.cxx(108) PWLib Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock
failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107


Snark
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Damien Sandras :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 17:12 +0200, Julien Puydt a écrit :
> Damien Sandras a écrit :
> < a list of problems>
>
> You forgot on shutdown :
>        assert.cxx(108) PWLib Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock
> failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
> Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
> ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107

I don't get that one...
--
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras@...
                       

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Eugen Dedu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Julien Puydt wrote:
> Damien Sandras a écrit :
> < a list of problems>
>
> You forgot on shutdown :
>       assert.cxx(108)    PWLib    Assertion fail: Function
> pthread_mutex_lock failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432,
> Error=107
> Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
> ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107

There was also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585287, I do
not know if it is still actual or not.  I will check it in a few days.

--
Eugen
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Damien Sandras :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:08 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :

> Julien Puydt wrote:
> > Damien Sandras a écrit :
> > < a list of problems>
> >
> > You forgot on shutdown :
> >       assert.cxx(108)    PWLib    Assertion fail: Function
> > pthread_mutex_lock failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432,
> > Error=107
> > Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
> > ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
>
> There was also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585287, I do
> not know if it is still actual or not.  I will check it in a few days.
>

This one seems to work here. I'm registered to two accounts.

However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
starting. Is that STUN detection?

Well, trunk is in a good shape :P
--
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras@...
                       

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Damien Sandras :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:18 +0200, Damien Sandras a écrit :

> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:08 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> > Julien Puydt wrote:
> > > Damien Sandras a écrit :
> > > < a list of problems>
> > >
> > > You forgot on shutdown :
> > >       assert.cxx(108)    PWLib    Assertion fail: Function
> > > pthread_mutex_lock failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432,
> > > Error=107
> > > Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
> > > ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
> >
> > There was also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585287, I do
> > not know if it is still actual or not.  I will check it in a few days.
> >
>
> This one seems to work here. I'm registered to two accounts.
>
> However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
> starting. Is that STUN detection?

I confirm, the UI is hidden until STUN detection is done.

Julien, can it be related to any of your changes ? (Kickstart or
other ?)

--
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras@...
                       

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Eugen Dedu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damien Sandras wrote:

> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:08 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
>> Julien Puydt wrote:
>>> Damien Sandras a écrit :
>>> < a list of problems>
>>>
>>> You forgot on shutdown :
>>>       assert.cxx(108)    PWLib    Assertion fail: Function
>>> pthread_mutex_lock failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432,
>>> Error=107
>>> Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
>>> ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
>> There was also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585287, I do
>> not know if it is still actual or not.  I will check it in a few days.
>>
>
> This one seems to work here. I'm registered to two accounts.
>
> However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
> starting. Is that STUN detection?

I noticed also on STABLE this problem.  *Sometimes*, it takes 15-20 secs
for the GUI to appear.  The -d 4 blocks right after DNS SRV Lookup for a
few seconds, and this appears a few times upon starting => 15-20 secs
for the GUI to appear.

I thought that it is a temporary dns problem, or maybe because I use
wi-fi and the packet is lost.  Do you need a -d 4 (I wil lookfor it in
my logs) for that or not?


Finally, at work I have a static NAT.  Sometimes, STUN (hence ekiga)
tells me symmetric nat, I think it appears only when I have executed
ekiga before.  Is this also normal from time to time?  At home, with a
port restricted nat, I have not noticed this problem (I think).

--
Eugen
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Damien Sandras :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:30 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :

> Damien Sandras wrote:
> > Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:08 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
> >> Julien Puydt wrote:
> >>> Damien Sandras a écrit :
> >>> < a list of problems>
> >>>
> >>> You forgot on shutdown :
> >>>       assert.cxx(108)    PWLib    Assertion fail: Function
> >>> pthread_mutex_lock failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432,
> >>> Error=107
> >>> Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
> >>> ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
> >> There was also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585287, I do
> >> not know if it is still actual or not.  I will check it in a few days.
> >>
> >
> > This one seems to work here. I'm registered to two accounts.
> >
> > However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
> > starting. Is that STUN detection?
>
> I noticed also on STABLE this problem.  *Sometimes*, it takes 15-20 secs
> for the GUI to appear.  The -d 4 blocks right after DNS SRV Lookup for a
> few seconds, and this appears a few times upon starting => 15-20 secs
> for the GUI to appear.
>
> I thought that it is a temporary dns problem, or maybe because I use
> wi-fi and the packet is lost.  Do you need a -d 4 (I wil lookfor it in
> my logs) for that or not?

I won't fix stable. It is just an annoyance. Moreover, it is not the
same one because I don't have the problem with stable at all.

> Finally, at work I have a static NAT.  Sometimes, STUN (hence ekiga)
> tells me symmetric nat, I think it appears only when I have executed
> ekiga before.  Is this also normal from time to time?  At home, with a
> port restricted nat, I have not noticed this problem (I think).

Not sure what static nat is.
--
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras@...
                       

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Eugen Dedu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damien Sandras wrote:

> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:30 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
>> Damien Sandras wrote:
>>> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:08 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
>>>> Julien Puydt wrote:
>>>>> Damien Sandras a écrit :
>>>>> < a list of problems>
>>>>>
>>>>> You forgot on shutdown :
>>>>>       assert.cxx(108)    PWLib    Assertion fail: Function
>>>>> pthread_mutex_lock failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432,
>>>>> Error=107
>>>>> Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
>>>>> ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
>>>> There was also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585287, I do
>>>> not know if it is still actual or not.  I will check it in a few days.
>>>>
>>> This one seems to work here. I'm registered to two accounts.
>>>
>>> However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
>>> starting. Is that STUN detection?
>> I noticed also on STABLE this problem.  *Sometimes*, it takes 15-20 secs
>> for the GUI to appear.  The -d 4 blocks right after DNS SRV Lookup for a
>> few seconds, and this appears a few times upon starting => 15-20 secs
>> for the GUI to appear.
>>
>> I thought that it is a temporary dns problem, or maybe because I use
>> wi-fi and the packet is lost.  Do you need a -d 4 (I wil lookfor it in
>> my logs) for that or not?
>
> I won't fix stable. It is just an annoyance. Moreover, it is not the
> same one because I don't have the problem with stable at all.
>
>> Finally, at work I have a static NAT.  Sometimes, STUN (hence ekiga)
>> tells me symmetric nat, I think it appears only when I have executed
>> ekiga before.  Is this also normal from time to time?  At home, with a
>> port restricted nat, I have not noticed this problem (I think).
>
> Not sure what static nat is.

Well, I have a private address, and on the nat machine I have a public
address *only* for me.  But maybe the administrator has done a special
configuration for me, so let's forget about that.

--
Eugen
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Yannick-GNU/Linux :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damien Sandras a écrit :

> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:18 +0200, Damien Sandras a écrit :
>> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:08 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :
>>> Julien Puydt wrote:
>>>> Damien Sandras a écrit :
>>>> < a list of problems>
>>>>
>>>> You forgot on shutdown :
>>>>       assert.cxx(108)    PWLib    Assertion fail: Function
>>>> pthread_mutex_lock failed, file ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432,
>>>> Error=107
>>>> Assertion fail: Function pthread_mutex_lock failed, file
>>>> ptlib/unix/tlibthrd.cxx, line 1432, Error=107
>>> There was also http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585287, I do
>>> not know if it is still actual or not.  I will check it in a few days.
>>>
>> This one seems to work here. I'm registered to two accounts.
>>
>> However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
>> starting. Is that STUN detection?
>
> I confirm, the UI is hidden until STUN detection is done.
>
> Julien, can it be related to any of your changes ? (Kickstart or
> other ?)
>

I think it is the same behavior in the stable branch
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Damien Sandras :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:59 +0200, yannick a écrit :

> >> However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
> >> starting. Is that STUN detection?
> >
> > I confirm, the UI is hidden until STUN detection is done.
> >
> > Julien, can it be related to any of your changes ? (Kickstart or
> > other ?)
> >
>
> I think it is the same behavior in the stable branch

Sigh, not here... :(
--
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras@...
                       

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Eugen Dedu :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Damien Sandras wrote:

> Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:59 +0200, yannick a écrit :
>>>> However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
>>>> starting. Is that STUN detection?
>>> I confirm, the UI is hidden until STUN detection is done.
>>>
>>> Julien, can it be related to any of your changes ? (Kickstart or
>>> other ?)
>>>
>> I think it is the same behavior in the stable branch
>
> Sigh, not here... :(

Tested right now: here, on stable, the UI is hidden until stun replies.

--
Eugen
_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list

Re: Ekiga Trunk in bad state: help confirming this

by Damien Sandras :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 19:44 +0200, Eugen Dedu a écrit :

> Damien Sandras wrote:
> > Le dimanche 20 septembre 2009 à 18:59 +0200, yannick a écrit :
> >>>> However, one problem is that Ekiga now waits a few seconds before
> >>>> starting. Is that STUN detection?
> >>> I confirm, the UI is hidden until STUN detection is done.
> >>>
> >>> Julien, can it be related to any of your changes ? (Kickstart or
> >>> other ?)
> >>>
> >> I think it is the same behavior in the stable branch
> >
> > Sigh, not here... :(
>
> Tested right now: here, on stable, the UI is hidden until stun replies.

Something we'll fix for TRUNK (and perhaps STABLE later).

--
 _     Damien Sandras
(o-      
//\    Ekiga Softphone : http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_   Be IP           : http://www.beip.be/
       FOSDEM          : http://www.fosdem.org/
       SIP Phone       : sip:dsandras@...
                       

_______________________________________________
Ekiga-devel-list mailing list
Ekiga-devel-list@...
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/ekiga-devel-list