|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedHi,
JaWE 3.0-1 version is available for the download from: http://forge.objectweb.org/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50 and you can try Java Web Start version from http://jawe.objectweb.org/twe.jnlp JaWE is completely opensource again, and 3.0-1 version now includes all the features professional version had, plus additional process report in PDF (taken from JPEd) ! You can read release notes here: http://forge.ow2.org/project/shownotes.php?release_id=3540 SVN source code is updated and tagged. Greetings, Sasa. -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedWith a "little" difference between the new version and the previous: Newer is GPL which means people who wrote a commercial application based on 2.x (LPGL) will open their sources if they want to use 3.x version.
I feel you are playing chess again. 2009/9/22 Sasa Bojanic <sasaboy@...> Hi, -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedHi,
as initiator of the JPEd fork, I would like to congratulate Sasa for the step to make JaWE fully available again. I started JPEd as an appendix on the WfMOpen site (http://wfmopen.sf.net) because I was very annoyed that the possibility to maintain our XPDL files -- including the layout -- had gone away. I have always felt that the fork proofed one of the concepts of Open Source, because it took only a rather small effort to regain the control over a software that we needed and that we had invested in, although the original authors had decided to go commercial (though denied by Together AT, I still consider it rather obvious that it was all about collecting license fees after having gained some popularity). While JPEd in its initial, JaWE-close version, satisfied our needs, David Delbecq required additional features. So I transfered JPEd to an SF project of its own. All credit for the further development and the really nice home page goes to him. When I built JPEd based on the JaWE sources, I changed the license from LGPL to GPL (From LGPL 2.1: "You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library."). I have always felt that the GPL is more appropriate for a tool (I'm not talking about libraries here!). When Sasa decided to include features from JPEd in the new version of JaWE, he therefore had no choice but to use the GPL, because the change from LGPL to GPL cannot be reversed. Of course, I don't know about Sasa's motivation. Maybe he is "playing chess again" (as Pablo Beltran assumes) and I haven't found out yet what he's aiming at. But for now I simply assume that JaWE licenses haven't proofed as successful as anticipated. So integrating the JPEd features and thus making JaWE a stronger tool puts him in a better position to sell support for JaWE. But this is pure speculation from my side. Personally, I feel very happy about having a JaWE (or TWE) with bundled additional features from two development branches fully available again. (Of course, learning from experience, I have downloaded the sources immediately.) My sympathy with "People who wrote a commercial application based on 2.x (LPGL)" (cited from Pablo Beltran's mail) is very limited. If the add-on is really substantial and worth it, the author should improve the GPL'ed version to support plugin functions as required by the commercial feature and provide the commercial feature as plugin. Nothing from the GPL prevents that. And if it is only a minor feature not worth this effort, why should the author profit from the work freely provided by others? (By the way, does anybody know the commercial version referred to? Neither googling for "TWE based" nor for "JaWE based" resulted in significant hits...) Regards and congratulations again Sasa, Michael -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedI very much like the move to open advanced features !!
Excelent job and great idea. Vojtech Huser On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Sasa Bojanic <sasaboy@...> wrote: Hi, -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedHi, "Playing chess" means every major release (1.x,2.x,3.x) of Jawe and Shark introduces changes to impede and difficult commercial 3rd party tools build on them. You see, JaWe 1.x -> GPL Shark 1.x -> GPL ---------------------------------- Jawe 2.x-> LGPL (Good!) Shark 2.x -> LGPL (Good!) At this point, a commercial branch is started by Together-> Hard difficulties begun to integrate JAWE into Shark to build a Professional alternative. You can read them on the forum. But writing enough good challenger alternatives to Together's Professional version is still possible with a lot of effort.You can see some of them searching on the Internet. -> How to avoid them? ---------------------------------- JaWe 3.x -> GPL -> Avoids using it commercially -> No more commercial challengers. Yes, you gain a cookie! You think you are winning because some additional stuff functionality has been included, but you are loosing because nobody will seriously try to improve Shark (nor JaWE). Shark 3.x -> ??? No matters, because without JaWE... it's no-dangerous. I guess it'll remain LGPL. I think they are playing chess because they give you a Tower but you lost the Queen. IMHO, GPL is the bad license for Open Source's success. Best regards, Pablo. -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 released"Tower" is "Rook". Sorry for bad translation from Spanish :) -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedHi,
> But writing enough good challenger alternatives to Together's Professional > version is still possible with a lot of effort.You can see some of them > searching on the Internet. -> How to avoid them? I'm still curious about commercial JaWe 2.x based products and what kind of value they add to JaWe. As mentioned before, I failed to find any. Couldn't you be more specific and give us some links? - Michael -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedHi,
YAPROC (developed by me) is a good example. It brings all the power of Shark and JaWE into the Eclipse platform. Here is the link: http://www.upversion.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=55&Itemid=58 It adds some additional nice features: * audit/visualize/reproduce step by step and graphically the history of a process, * reports based on SQL which could be called from your favourite reporting tool (CrystaReports, JasperResports,...) * ... YAPROC isn't too much popular but each month around 5-10 different people download the sources. Most of the from the USA. Those folks could write a new version giving workflow support based on Shark/JaWE to the rest of Eclipse plugins. I think it would be really nice. But now, I think they could be discouraged due the new Jawe 3.0 GPL license. Bests regards, Pablo PS: In the lastest JaWE's change log you can see more "chess" movements: the API for Shark has been dropped from the Open Source version. I think people don't understand what really it means. I'll explain it to them: a big stone on the way between Shark and JaWe integration. 2009/10/10 Michael Lipp <mnl@...> Hi, -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 releasedHi,
> YAPROC (developed by me) is a good example. It brings all the power of > Shark and JaWE into the Eclipse platform. It's a bad example because it's neither commercial nor closed source. So I'm still curious about commercial JaWe 2.x based products... - Michael > 2009/10/10 Michael Lipp <mnl@...> > Hi, > I'm still curious about commercial JaWe 2.x based products and > what kind > of value they add to JaWe. As mentioned before, I failed to > find any. > Couldn't you be more specific and give us some links? > > - Michael > -- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
|
|
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Enhydra JaWE 3.0-1 released:)
It's the BEST example because it was not open source at the begginig and it was developed to be a commercial product. But just some weeks after the first release I discontinued it and I published the source... And I didn''t waste more time, effort and money to work on it. Now, after the JaWE 3.0 release, I take the right decission in the right moment. And now I develop commercial projects on truly open source projects. Not Shark nor JaWE :). Best regards, Pablo. 2009/10/10 Michael Lipp <mnl@...>
-- You receive this message as a subscriber of the jawe@... mailing list. To unsubscribe: mailto:jawe-unsubscribe@... For general help: mailto:sympa@...?subject=help OW2 mailing lists service home page: http://www.ow2.org/wws |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |