|
View:
New views
10 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
Ev Batteries
by Rob Russo
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Thanks to all who responded.
I guess my main concern and probably the first decision I have to make is the type and voltage of the battery pack. I want to avoid lead acid batteries because it seems counterintuitive to add all that weight to such a light vehicle.
Is this battery pack practical for my application?: http://www.lifebatt.com/HPSpacks.asp . Are there any alternative sources for this type of battery?
Thanks,
-Rob
_______________________________________________ Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
|
|
Re: Ev Batteries
by Graunke, Gary
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Looking at the Sandia report, these
batteries should be great in an EV. It doesn’t answer the question of
quality of manufacturing, but covers everything else. Our experience with A123’s LiFePO4
was that 1-2% have a higher self-discharge rate, but they are otherwise very
consistent and meet and exceed specs in every way. These also meet or exceed specs in every
way, according to the authors. To deal with these kind of variations, I
would suggest the 12V 40AH to 80AH batteries (maybe even the 120AH if you have
a pickup truck), so you have 4 to 12 cells in parallel. The 26 to 34 lb batteries are easy to life
by hand if you need to work on them. The AH depends on your desired range
and/or $ you have to invest. The low temperature performance is better
than lead-acid as well, losing only 25% at freezing (about our low in There is no high temperature concern (life
with most other batteries!). Buying the batteries in this package makes
it difficult (if not impractical) to do individual cell group management, but
it sure is convenient! However, it may well be that monitoring the
battery voltage at 12V will be good enough (that is what we are forced to do
with lead acid batteries in any case). (The issue is that one should slow down/shut
off the charger when a cell reaches maximum voltage to avoid overcharging it). The
self-discharge rates on a cell mean that you may want to charge individual
cells (or cell groups if they are in parallel) to keep them in balance. I do
this manually right now every 10 months or so with A123 cells, but will
eventually put in equalizers to do this continuously. Bottom line—I would have used
batteries like this in my Insight had they been available 3 years ago. Let us
know how much they want for them. Other sources are thunder sky (though they
have not met specs in their early offerings), peak battery ( It is important to assess the quality of
the batteries. It helps to know someone who has been using them, but this is
difficult with new batteries. The Sandia report is very helpful in this regard,
but there is always a concern that they “cherry-picked” the cells
that they sent for testing (rather than a random sample from their production).
Keep us informed with your progress! From:
oeva-list-bounces@... [mailto:oeva-list-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Rob Russo Thanks to all who responded. I guess my main concern and probably the first decision I have to
make is the type and voltage of the battery pack. I want to avoid lead
acid batteries because it seems counterintuitive to add all that weight to such
a light vehicle. Is this battery pack practical for my application?: http://www.lifebatt.com/HPSpacks.asp .
Are there any alternative sources for this type of battery? Thanks, -Rob _______________________________________________ Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
|
|
|
|
|
Lightly used Interstate 6V deep cycle batteries
by Oliver-70
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message I was looking around for a couple 'lightly used' batteries to complete a
'6-pack' of T-105's for my 36V CitiCar, and just purchased the 2 from a this ad: http://salem.craigslist.org/rvs/1401279881.html He also has 2 Interstate batteries for sale. They tested fine and are only 5-6 months old - $125 for the pair. Very reasonable person to deal with. They were used in an RV that he has re-configured. Cheers! -Oliver P.S. I have no personal interest in the above, just thought I would pass it along. _______________________________________________ Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Ev Batteries
by Paul Wallace-3
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message I'm just about to pick up a set of 96 100ah Sky Energy Li Ion cells from
EV Components. I am also getting the BMS that they offer, which allows them to extend a 2 year warranty on the cells. The total package cost is just under $15k. The people at EV Components and their customers are seem to be having good results now with both the Sky Energy and the Thundersky cells. With the 2 year warranty, I feel that I should be covered for any infancy failures. I wasn't able to get IE to open the web page you sent this morning. I'll try again later with my Mac. Paul Wallace Graunke, Gary wrote: > Looking at the Sandia report, these batteries should be great in an EV. > It doesn’t answer the question of quality of manufacturing, but covers > everything else. > > Our experience with A123’s LiFePO4 was that 1-2% have a higher > self-discharge rate, but they are otherwise very consistent and meet and > exceed specs in every way. > > These also meet or exceed specs in every way, according to the authors. > > > > To deal with these kind of variations, I would suggest the 12V 40AH to > 80AH batteries (maybe even the 120AH if you have a pickup truck), so you > have 4 to 12 cells in parallel. > > The 26 to 34 lb batteries are easy to life by hand if you need to work > on them. The AH depends on your desired range and/or $ you have to invest. > > > > The low temperature performance is better than lead-acid as well, losing > only 25% at freezing (about our low in Portland) or 34% if you live in > Bend. The high power of the cells helps the low temperature performance, > however, compared to lead, and you still can put in battery heaters or > an insulated battery box if this is a concern. An insulated battery box > would also help if you have a catastrophic cell failure with 160C > temperatures. (Always vent the box to the outside (not cabin) for this > reason, though it is not critical). > > There is no high temperature concern (life with most other batteries!). > > > > Buying the batteries in this package makes it difficult (if not > impractical) to do individual cell group management, but it sure is > convenient! However, it may well be that monitoring the battery voltage > at 12V will be good enough (that is what we are forced to do with lead > acid batteries in any case). (The issue is that one should slow > down/shut off the charger when a cell reaches maximum voltage to avoid > overcharging it). The self-discharge rates on a cell mean that you may > want to charge individual cells (or cell groups if they are in parallel) > to keep them in balance. I do this manually right now every 10 months or > so with A123 cells, but will eventually put in equalizers to do this > continuously. > > > > Bottom line—I would have used batteries like this in my Insight had they > been available 3 years ago. Let us know how much they want for them. > > > > Other sources are thunder sky (though they have not met specs in their > early offerings), peak battery (K2). I am running K2 batteries in my > plug-in Prius from EEtrex—they have less (but still adequate) power than > A123’s, but 30% more energy per same size and weight cell. > > > > It is important to assess the quality of the batteries. It helps to know > someone who has been using them, but this is difficult with new > batteries. The Sandia report is very helpful in this regard, but there > is always a concern that they “cherry-picked” the cells that they sent > for testing (rather than a random sample from their production). > > > > Keep us informed with your progress! > > > > Gary > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From:* oeva-list-bounces@... [mailto:oeva-list-bounces@...] > *On Behalf Of *Rob Russo > *Sent:* Friday, October 09, 2009 6:45 PM > *To:* oeva-list@... > *Subject:* [Oeva-list] Ev Batteries > > > > Thanks to all who responded. > > I guess my main concern and probably the first decision I have to make > is the type and voltage of the battery pack. I want to avoid lead acid > batteries because it seems counterintuitive to add all that weight to > such a light vehicle. > > Is this battery pack practical for my application?: > http://www.lifebatt.com/HPSpacks.asp . Are there any alternative sources > for this type of battery? > > > > Thanks, > > -Rob > > > > > > > Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
|
|
Re: Ev Batteries
by GeneF
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Hi,
I visited the website for LifeBatt.com They don't sell individual cells but sell in multiples of 12V packs. The RFQ page has the following statement: " NOTE: LiFeBATT does not sell individual Cells or sub-components! Please only fill out this RFQ for complete Plug & Play XPS Packs with On-Board Diagnostics, Battery Management Systems, Over & Under Voltage protection circuits and overall Battery Protection Modules." They provide the on-board diagnostics and BMS, etc. I suppose they will supply the protocol, or is it a closed system? Anyone know? Gene > I'm just about to pick up a set of 96 100ah Sky Energy Li Ion cells from > EV Components. I am also getting the BMS that they offer, which allows > them to extend a 2 year warranty on the cells. The total package cost > is just under $15k. The people at EV Components and their customers are > seem to be having good results now with both the Sky Energy and the > Thundersky cells. With the 2 year warranty, I feel that I should be > covered for any infancy failures. > > I wasn't able to get IE to open the web page you sent this morning. > I'll try again later with my Mac. > > Paul Wallace > > Graunke, Gary wrote: >> Looking at the Sandia report, these batteries should be great in an EV. >> It doesnt answer the question of quality of manufacturing, but covers >> everything else. >> >> Our experience with A123s LiFePO4 was that 1-2% have a higher >> self-discharge rate, but they are otherwise very consistent and meet and >> exceed specs in every way. >> >> These also meet or exceed specs in every way, according to the authors. >> >> >> >> To deal with these kind of variations, I would suggest the 12V 40AH to >> 80AH batteries (maybe even the 120AH if you have a pickup truck), so you >> have 4 to 12 cells in parallel. >> >> The 26 to 34 lb batteries are easy to life by hand if you need to work >> on them. The AH depends on your desired range and/or $ you have to >> invest. >> >> >> >> The low temperature performance is better than lead-acid as well, losing >> only 25% at freezing (about our low in Portland) or 34% if you live in >> Bend. The high power of the cells helps the low temperature performance, >> however, compared to lead, and you still can put in battery heaters or >> an insulated battery box if this is a concern. An insulated battery box >> would also help if you have a catastrophic cell failure with 160C >> temperatures. (Always vent the box to the outside (not cabin) for this >> reason, though it is not critical). >> >> There is no high temperature concern (life with most other batteries!). >> >> >> >> Buying the batteries in this package makes it difficult (if not >> impractical) to do individual cell group management, but it sure is >> convenient! However, it may well be that monitoring the battery voltage >> at 12V will be good enough (that is what we are forced to do with lead >> acid batteries in any case). (The issue is that one should slow >> down/shut off the charger when a cell reaches maximum voltage to avoid >> overcharging it). The self-discharge rates on a cell mean that you may >> want to charge individual cells (or cell groups if they are in parallel) >> to keep them in balance. I do this manually right now every 10 months or >> so with A123 cells, but will eventually put in equalizers to do this >> continuously. >> >> >> >> Bottom lineI would have used batteries like this in my Insight had they >> been available 3 years ago. Let us know how much they want for them. >> >> >> >> Other sources are thunder sky (though they have not met specs in their >> early offerings), peak battery (K2). I am running K2 batteries in my >> plug-in Prius from EEtrexthey have less (but still adequate) power than >> A123s, but 30% more energy per same size and weight cell. >> >> >> >> It is important to assess the quality of the batteries. It helps to know >> someone who has been using them, but this is difficult with new >> batteries. The Sandia report is very helpful in this regard, but there >> is always a concern that they cherry-picked the cells that they sent >> for testing (rather than a random sample from their production). >> >> >> >> Keep us informed with your progress! >> >> >> >> Gary >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> *From:* oeva-list-bounces@... [mailto:oeva-list-bounces@...] >> *On Behalf Of *Rob Russo >> *Sent:* Friday, October 09, 2009 6:45 PM >> *To:* oeva-list@... >> *Subject:* [Oeva-list] Ev Batteries >> >> >> >> Thanks to all who responded. >> >> I guess my main concern and probably the first decision I have to make >> is the type and voltage of the battery pack. I want to avoid lead acid >> batteries because it seems counterintuitive to add all that weight to >> such a light vehicle. >> >> Is this battery pack practical for my application?: >> http://www.lifebatt.com/HPSpacks.asp . Are there any alternative sources >> for this type of battery? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -Rob >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Oeva-list mailing list > Oeva-list@... > http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list > _______________________________________________ Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
|
|
Re: Ev Batteries
by Paul Wallace-3
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Too bad they aren't offering the 12v modules in a 100ah version. to get
same total energy I'm going to have would requires 32 of the 80ah modules, pushing the nominal pack voltage too high for most DC controllers available today. Even my Zilla 1kehv limits out at about 375vdc. AC controllers may go a bit higher, but the one I'll be using limits at a voltage similar to the Zilla. Using the 120ah modules puts the nominal pack voltage too low, making the current too high under cruising conditions for standard chemistry Li Ion. I wasn't able to find any technical data on max and sustained discharge currents on the site. If they are similar to the A123 cells, then they will be able to withstand higher sustained and max currents than the Sky Energy cells I'll be using, making a lower voltage equivalent total energy pack possible. The weight of the batteries is also interesting. The cells I'm getting will be about 675lbs, while an equivalent pack of these LifeBatts will be around 1300lbs. Paul gfifield@... wrote: > Hi, > I visited the website for LifeBatt.com > They don't sell individual cells but sell in multiples of 12V packs. > The RFQ page has the following statement: > " NOTE: LiFeBATT does not sell individual Cells or sub-components! > Please only fill out this RFQ for complete Plug & Play XPS Packs with > On-Board Diagnostics, Battery Management Systems, Over & Under Voltage > protection circuits and overall Battery Protection Modules." > > They provide the on-board diagnostics and BMS, etc. > I suppose they will supply the protocol, or is it a closed system? > Anyone know? > > Gene >> I'm just about to pick up a set of 96 100ah Sky Energy Li Ion cells from >> EV Components. I am also getting the BMS that they offer, which allows >> them to extend a 2 year warranty on the cells. The total package cost >> is just under $15k. The people at EV Components and their customers are >> seem to be having good results now with both the Sky Energy and the >> Thundersky cells. With the 2 year warranty, I feel that I should be >> covered for any infancy failures. >> >> I wasn't able to get IE to open the web page you sent this morning. >> I'll try again later with my Mac. >> >> Paul Wallace >> >> Graunke, Gary wrote: >>> Looking at the Sandia report, these batteries should be great in an EV. >>> It doesn’t answer the question of quality of manufacturing, but covers >>> everything else. >>> >>> Our experience with A123’s LiFePO4 was that 1-2% have a higher >>> self-discharge rate, but they are otherwise very consistent and meet and >>> exceed specs in every way. >>> >>> These also meet or exceed specs in every way, according to the authors. >>> >>> >>> >>> To deal with these kind of variations, I would suggest the 12V 40AH to >>> 80AH batteries (maybe even the 120AH if you have a pickup truck), so you >>> have 4 to 12 cells in parallel. >>> >>> The 26 to 34 lb batteries are easy to life by hand if you need to work >>> on them. The AH depends on your desired range and/or $ you have to >>> invest. >>> >>> >>> >>> The low temperature performance is better than lead-acid as well, losing >>> only 25% at freezing (about our low in Portland) or 34% if you live in >>> Bend. The high power of the cells helps the low temperature performance, >>> however, compared to lead, and you still can put in battery heaters or >>> an insulated battery box if this is a concern. An insulated battery box >>> would also help if you have a catastrophic cell failure with 160C >>> temperatures. (Always vent the box to the outside (not cabin) for this >>> reason, though it is not critical). >>> >>> There is no high temperature concern (life with most other batteries!). >>> >>> >>> >>> Buying the batteries in this package makes it difficult (if not >>> impractical) to do individual cell group management, but it sure is >>> convenient! However, it may well be that monitoring the battery voltage >>> at 12V will be good enough (that is what we are forced to do with lead >>> acid batteries in any case). (The issue is that one should slow >>> down/shut off the charger when a cell reaches maximum voltage to avoid >>> overcharging it). The self-discharge rates on a cell mean that you may >>> want to charge individual cells (or cell groups if they are in parallel) >>> to keep them in balance. I do this manually right now every 10 months or >>> so with A123 cells, but will eventually put in equalizers to do this >>> continuously. >>> >>> >>> >>> Bottom line—I would have used batteries like this in my Insight had they >>> been available 3 years ago. Let us know how much they want for them. >>> >>> >>> >>> Other sources are thunder sky (though they have not met specs in their >>> early offerings), peak battery (K2). I am running K2 batteries in my >>> plug-in Prius from EEtrex—they have less (but still adequate) power than >>> A123’s, but 30% more energy per same size and weight cell. >>> >>> >>> >>> It is important to assess the quality of the batteries. It helps to know >>> someone who has been using them, but this is difficult with new >>> batteries. The Sandia report is very helpful in this regard, but there >>> is always a concern that they “cherry-picked” the cells that they sent >>> for testing (rather than a random sample from their production). >>> >>> >>> >>> Keep us informed with your progress! >>> >>> >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> *From:* oeva-list-bounces@... [mailto:oeva-list-bounces@...] >>> *On Behalf Of *Rob Russo >>> *Sent:* Friday, October 09, 2009 6:45 PM >>> *To:* oeva-list@... >>> *Subject:* [Oeva-list] Ev Batteries >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks to all who responded. >>> >>> I guess my main concern and probably the first decision I have to make >>> is the type and voltage of the battery pack. I want to avoid lead acid >>> batteries because it seems counterintuitive to add all that weight to >>> such a light vehicle. >>> >>> Is this battery pack practical for my application?: >>> http://www.lifebatt.com/HPSpacks.asp . Are there any alternative sources >>> for this type of battery? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -Rob >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oeva-list mailing list >> Oeva-list@... >> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list >> > > > Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
|
|
Re: Ev Batteries
by GeneF
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message Hi Paul,
Why not just fill out their quote form with your particular desired configuration and see what they come back with? I'd be curious to know if they will deal with individuals. Gene > Too bad they aren't offering the 12v modules in a 100ah version. to get > same total energy I'm going to have would requires 32 of the 80ah > modules, pushing the nominal pack voltage too high for most DC > controllers available today. Even my Zilla 1kehv limits out at about > 375vdc. AC controllers may go a bit higher, but the one I'll be using > limits at a voltage similar to the Zilla. Using the 120ah modules puts > the nominal pack voltage too low, making the current too high under > cruising conditions for standard chemistry Li Ion. I wasn't able to > find any technical data on max and sustained discharge currents on the > site. If they are similar to the A123 cells, then they will be able to > withstand higher sustained and max currents than the Sky Energy cells > I'll be using, making a lower voltage equivalent total energy pack > possible. The weight of the batteries is also interesting. The cells > I'm getting will be about 675lbs, while an equivalent pack of these > LifeBatts will be around 1300lbs. > > Paul > > gfifield@... wrote: >> Hi, >> I visited the website for LifeBatt.com >> They don't sell individual cells but sell in multiples of 12V packs. >> The RFQ page has the following statement: >> " NOTE: LiFeBATT does not sell individual Cells or sub-components! >> Please only fill out this RFQ for complete Plug & Play XPS Packs with >> On-Board Diagnostics, Battery Management Systems, Over & Under Voltage >> protection circuits and overall Battery Protection Modules." >> >> They provide the on-board diagnostics and BMS, etc. >> I suppose they will supply the protocol, or is it a closed system? >> Anyone know? >> >> Gene >>> I'm just about to pick up a set of 96 100ah Sky Energy Li Ion cells >>> from >>> EV Components. I am also getting the BMS that they offer, which allows >>> them to extend a 2 year warranty on the cells. The total package cost >>> is just under $15k. The people at EV Components and their customers >>> are >>> seem to be having good results now with both the Sky Energy and the >>> Thundersky cells. With the 2 year warranty, I feel that I should be >>> covered for any infancy failures. >>> >>> I wasn't able to get IE to open the web page you sent this morning. >>> I'll try again later with my Mac. >>> >>> Paul Wallace >>> >>> Graunke, Gary wrote: >>>> Looking at the Sandia report, these batteries should be great in an >>>> EV. >>>> It doesnt answer the question of quality of manufacturing, but covers >>>> everything else. >>>> >>>> Our experience with A123s LiFePO4 was that 1-2% have a higher >>>> self-discharge rate, but they are otherwise very consistent and meet >>>> and >>>> exceed specs in every way. >>>> >>>> These also meet or exceed specs in every way, according to the >>>> authors. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> To deal with these kind of variations, I would suggest the 12V 40AH to >>>> 80AH batteries (maybe even the 120AH if you have a pickup truck), so >>>> you >>>> have 4 to 12 cells in parallel. >>>> >>>> The 26 to 34 lb batteries are easy to life by hand if you need to work >>>> on them. The AH depends on your desired range and/or $ you have to >>>> invest. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The low temperature performance is better than lead-acid as well, >>>> losing >>>> only 25% at freezing (about our low in Portland) or 34% if you live in >>>> Bend. The high power of the cells helps the low temperature >>>> performance, >>>> however, compared to lead, and you still can put in battery heaters or >>>> an insulated battery box if this is a concern. An insulated battery >>>> box >>>> would also help if you have a catastrophic cell failure with 160C >>>> temperatures. (Always vent the box to the outside (not cabin) for this >>>> reason, though it is not critical). >>>> >>>> There is no high temperature concern (life with most other >>>> batteries!). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Buying the batteries in this package makes it difficult (if not >>>> impractical) to do individual cell group management, but it sure is >>>> convenient! However, it may well be that monitoring the battery >>>> voltage >>>> at 12V will be good enough (that is what we are forced to do with lead >>>> acid batteries in any case). (The issue is that one should slow >>>> down/shut off the charger when a cell reaches maximum voltage to avoid >>>> overcharging it). The self-discharge rates on a cell mean that you may >>>> want to charge individual cells (or cell groups if they are in >>>> parallel) >>>> to keep them in balance. I do this manually right now every 10 months >>>> or >>>> so with A123 cells, but will eventually put in equalizers to do this >>>> continuously. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Bottom lineI would have used batteries like this in my Insight had >>>> they >>>> been available 3 years ago. Let us know how much they want for them. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Other sources are thunder sky (though they have not met specs in their >>>> early offerings), peak battery (K2). I am running K2 batteries in my >>>> plug-in Prius from EEtrexthey have less (but still adequate) power >>>> than >>>> A123s, but 30% more energy per same size and weight cell. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It is important to assess the quality of the batteries. It helps to >>>> know >>>> someone who has been using them, but this is difficult with new >>>> batteries. The Sandia report is very helpful in this regard, but there >>>> is always a concern that they cherry-picked the cells that they sent >>>> for testing (rather than a random sample from their production). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Keep us informed with your progress! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> *From:* oeva-list-bounces@... [mailto:oeva-list-bounces@...] >>>> *On Behalf Of *Rob Russo >>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 09, 2009 6:45 PM >>>> *To:* oeva-list@... >>>> *Subject:* [Oeva-list] Ev Batteries >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks to all who responded. >>>> >>>> I guess my main concern and probably the first decision I have to make >>>> is the type and voltage of the battery pack. I want to avoid lead acid >>>> batteries because it seems counterintuitive to add all that weight to >>>> such a light vehicle. >>>> >>>> Is this battery pack practical for my application?: >>>> http://www.lifebatt.com/HPSpacks.asp . Are there any alternative >>>> sources >>>> for this type of battery? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> -Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Oeva-list mailing list >>> Oeva-list@... >>> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list >>> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
|
|
Re: Ev Batteries
by Paul Wallace-3
::
Rate this Message:
Reply (Restricted by the Administrator) | Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message EV Components was asking if anyone was serious about using the A123
cells. Sounded as if they were considering approaching A123 with some sort of battery system proposal. EV Components was soliciting input on number of cells, AH requirements, max voltage. I would much rather work with them at this point rather than a company that doesn't even publish a spec sheet. If I were in the process of converting my Insight, I might send in an RFQ, but I've got my hands full with my truck project for now. Paul gfifield@... wrote: > Hi Paul, > Why not just fill out their quote form with your particular desired > configuration and see what they come back with? I'd be curious to know if > they will deal with individuals. > Gene > >> Too bad they aren't offering the 12v modules in a 100ah version. to get >> same total energy I'm going to have would requires 32 of the 80ah >> modules, pushing the nominal pack voltage too high for most DC >> controllers available today. Even my Zilla 1kehv limits out at about >> 375vdc. AC controllers may go a bit higher, but the one I'll be using >> limits at a voltage similar to the Zilla. Using the 120ah modules puts >> the nominal pack voltage too low, making the current too high under >> cruising conditions for standard chemistry Li Ion. I wasn't able to >> find any technical data on max and sustained discharge currents on the >> site. If they are similar to the A123 cells, then they will be able to >> withstand higher sustained and max currents than the Sky Energy cells >> I'll be using, making a lower voltage equivalent total energy pack >> possible. The weight of the batteries is also interesting. The cells >> I'm getting will be about 675lbs, while an equivalent pack of these >> LifeBatts will be around 1300lbs. >> >> Paul >> >> gfifield@... wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I visited the website for LifeBatt.com >>> They don't sell individual cells but sell in multiples of 12V packs. >>> The RFQ page has the following statement: >>> " NOTE: LiFeBATT does not sell individual Cells or sub-components! >>> Please only fill out this RFQ for complete Plug & Play XPS Packs with >>> On-Board Diagnostics, Battery Management Systems, Over & Under Voltage >>> protection circuits and overall Battery Protection Modules." >>> >>> They provide the on-board diagnostics and BMS, etc. >>> I suppose they will supply the protocol, or is it a closed system? >>> Anyone know? >>> >>> Gene >>>> I'm just about to pick up a set of 96 100ah Sky Energy Li Ion cells >>>> from >>>> EV Components. I am also getting the BMS that they offer, which allows >>>> them to extend a 2 year warranty on the cells. The total package cost >>>> is just under $15k. The people at EV Components and their customers >>>> are >>>> seem to be having good results now with both the Sky Energy and the >>>> Thundersky cells. With the 2 year warranty, I feel that I should be >>>> covered for any infancy failures. >>>> >>>> I wasn't able to get IE to open the web page you sent this morning. >>>> I'll try again later with my Mac. >>>> >>>> Paul Wallace >>>> >>>> Graunke, Gary wrote: >>>>> Looking at the Sandia report, these batteries should be great in an >>>>> EV. >>>>> It doesn’t answer the question of quality of manufacturing, but covers >>>>> everything else. >>>>> >>>>> Our experience with A123’s LiFePO4 was that 1-2% have a higher >>>>> self-discharge rate, but they are otherwise very consistent and meet >>>>> and >>>>> exceed specs in every way. >>>>> >>>>> These also meet or exceed specs in every way, according to the >>>>> authors. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To deal with these kind of variations, I would suggest the 12V 40AH to >>>>> 80AH batteries (maybe even the 120AH if you have a pickup truck), so >>>>> you >>>>> have 4 to 12 cells in parallel. >>>>> >>>>> The 26 to 34 lb batteries are easy to life by hand if you need to work >>>>> on them. The AH depends on your desired range and/or $ you have to >>>>> invest. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The low temperature performance is better than lead-acid as well, >>>>> losing >>>>> only 25% at freezing (about our low in Portland) or 34% if you live in >>>>> Bend. The high power of the cells helps the low temperature >>>>> performance, >>>>> however, compared to lead, and you still can put in battery heaters or >>>>> an insulated battery box if this is a concern. An insulated battery >>>>> box >>>>> would also help if you have a catastrophic cell failure with 160C >>>>> temperatures. (Always vent the box to the outside (not cabin) for this >>>>> reason, though it is not critical). >>>>> >>>>> There is no high temperature concern (life with most other >>>>> batteries!). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Buying the batteries in this package makes it difficult (if not >>>>> impractical) to do individual cell group management, but it sure is >>>>> convenient! However, it may well be that monitoring the battery >>>>> voltage >>>>> at 12V will be good enough (that is what we are forced to do with lead >>>>> acid batteries in any case). (The issue is that one should slow >>>>> down/shut off the charger when a cell reaches maximum voltage to avoid >>>>> overcharging it). The self-discharge rates on a cell mean that you may >>>>> want to charge individual cells (or cell groups if they are in >>>>> parallel) >>>>> to keep them in balance. I do this manually right now every 10 months >>>>> or >>>>> so with A123 cells, but will eventually put in equalizers to do this >>>>> continuously. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Bottom line—I would have used batteries like this in my Insight had >>>>> they >>>>> been available 3 years ago. Let us know how much they want for them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Other sources are thunder sky (though they have not met specs in their >>>>> early offerings), peak battery (K2). I am running K2 batteries in my >>>>> plug-in Prius from EEtrex—they have less (but still adequate) power >>>>> than >>>>> A123’s, but 30% more energy per same size and weight cell. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is important to assess the quality of the batteries. It helps to >>>>> know >>>>> someone who has been using them, but this is difficult with new >>>>> batteries. The Sandia report is very helpful in this regard, but there >>>>> is always a concern that they “cherry-picked” the cells that they sent >>>>> for testing (rather than a random sample from their production). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Keep us informed with your progress! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> *From:* oeva-list-bounces@... [mailto:oeva-list-bounces@...] >>>>> *On Behalf Of *Rob Russo >>>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 09, 2009 6:45 PM >>>>> *To:* oeva-list@... >>>>> *Subject:* [Oeva-list] Ev Batteries >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks to all who responded. >>>>> >>>>> I guess my main concern and probably the first decision I have to make >>>>> is the type and voltage of the battery pack. I want to avoid lead acid >>>>> batteries because it seems counterintuitive to add all that weight to >>>>> such a light vehicle. >>>>> >>>>> Is this battery pack practical for my application?: >>>>> http://www.lifebatt.com/HPSpacks.asp . Are there any alternative >>>>> sources >>>>> for this type of battery? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -Rob >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Oeva-list mailing list >>>> Oeva-list@... >>>> http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list >>>> >>> >>> > > > Oeva-list mailing list Oeva-list@... http://www.rdrop.com/mailman/listinfo/oeva-list |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |