Eventbug rising

View: New views
13 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Eventbug rising

by John J Barton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Just a peak at some work we are doing to allow Firebug to show event
listeners:
http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/09/18/eventbug-rising/

jjb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Eventbug rising

by Kevin Decker-3 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


Very cool.

What are the "Allows-Untrusted" captions in reference to?

On Sep 18, 7:06 pm, John J Barton <johnjbar...@...> wrote:
> Just a peak at some work we are doing to allow Firebug to show event
> listeners:http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/09/18/eventbug-rising/
>
> jjb
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Eventbug rising

by John J Barton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message




On Sep 19, 10:41 am, Kevin Decker <kpdec...@...> wrote:
> Very cool.
>
> What are the "Allows-Untrusted" captions in reference to?

I don't know, here is the answer I got when I asked on the bugzilla
bug:
------
> I don't know what allowsUntrusted or inSystemEventGroup  mean.
Event listeners can be added to listen either all events or only
trusted
events.
User initiated events are trusted and so are events dispatched by
chrome.
By default content event listeners listen all events, chrome listeners
only
trusted.
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/public/idl/events/nsIDOMNSEventTarget.idl#51

Gecko has 2 "event groups". Default and system. When event is
dispatched,
event target chain is looped and default listeners are called, then
there is a new loop and listeners in the system event group are
called.
Native default handling happens in the bubble phase of system event
group
(==PostHandleEvent).
-----------

Maybe we should suppress these attributes in web pages, they don't
affect web devs I think.

jjb

>
> On Sep 18, 7:06 pm, John J Barton <johnjbar...@...> wrote:
>
> > Just a peak at some work we are doing to allow Firebug to show event
> > listeners:http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/09/18/eventbug-rising/
>
> > jjb
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


Re: Eventbug rising

by jayarjo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Oh, my...

Can't you just release it as separate FireBug extension? :(

On Sep 19, 9:50 pm, johnjbarton <johnjbar...@...> wrote:

> On Sep 19, 10:41 am, Kevin Decker <kpdec...@...> wrote:
>
> > Very cool.
>
> > What are the "Allows-Untrusted" captions in reference to?
>
> I don't know, here is the answer I got when I asked on the bugzilla
> bug:
> ------> I don't know what allowsUntrusted or inSystemEventGroup  mean.
>
> Event listeners can be added to listen either all events or only
> trusted
> events.
> User initiated events are trusted and so are events dispatched by
> chrome.
> By default content event listeners listen all events, chrome listeners
> only
> trusted.http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/public/idl/events/n...
>
> Gecko has 2 "event groups". Default and system. When event is
> dispatched,
> event target chain is looped and default listeners are called, then
> there is a new loop and listeners in the system event group are
> called.
> Native default handling happens in the bubble phase of system event
> group
> (==PostHandleEvent).
> -----------
>
> Maybe we should suppress these attributes in web pages, they don't
> affect web devs I think.
>
> jjb
>
>
>
> > On Sep 18, 7:06 pm, John J Barton <johnjbar...@...> wrote:
>
> > > Just a peak at some work we are doing to allow Firebug to show event
> > > listeners:http://blog.getfirebug.com/2009/09/18/eventbug-rising/
>
> > > jjb

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by Honza (Jan Odvarko) :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

> Can't you just release it as separate FireBug extension? :(
It is a separate Firebug extension - EventBug.
Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by jayarjo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


I meant, can't you make it available as an extension... already? :)
Let it be even alpha. It is not available, right? Or is it?

On Oct 28, 4:28 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:
> > Can't you just release it as separate FireBug extension? :(
>
> It is a separate Firebug extension - EventBug.
> Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by Honza (Jan Odvarko) :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

We are almost ready, the plan is to get something out next week :-)

Honza


On Oct 28, 1:35 pm, jayarjo <jaya...@...> wrote:

> I meant, can't you make it available as an extension... already? :)
> Let it be even alpha. It is not available, right? Or is it?
>
> On Oct 28, 4:28 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:
>
> > > Can't you just release it as separate FireBug extension? :(
>
> > It is a separate Firebug extension - EventBug.
> > Honza
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by jayarjo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Wow.

Waiting impatiently :)

On Oct 28, 5:30 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:

> We are almost ready, the plan is to get something out next week :-)
>
> Honza
>
> On Oct 28, 1:35 pm, jayarjo <jaya...@...> wrote:
>
> > I meant, can't you make it available as an extension... already? :)
> > Let it be even alpha. It is not available, right? Or is it?
>
> > On Oct 28, 4:28 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > Can't you just release it as separate FireBug extension? :(
>
> > > It is a separate Firebug extension - EventBug.
> > > Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by Honza (Jan Odvarko) :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Eventbug released:
http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/eventbug-alpha-released/

Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by jayarjo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

That's huge!

On Oct 30, 4:08 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:
> Eventbug released:http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/eventbug-alpha-released/
>
> Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by jayarjo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

I've got very javascriptized web-site. In fact nothing exist on
initial load and is constructed  dynamically later through ajax calls.
When inspecting my dynamically built DOM elements I can see attached
events in EventBug, but when I expand them only "not implemented in
Javascript" is displayed. But it is. Handler is encapsulated inside a
widget, but it exists.

On Oct 31, 12:41 pm, jayarjo <jaya...@...> wrote:
> That's huge!
>
> On Oct 30, 4:08 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:
>
> > Eventbug released:http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/eventbug-alpha-released/
>
> > Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by John J Barton :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



On Oct 31, 2:24 am, jayarjo <jaya...@...> wrote:
> I've got very javascriptized web-site. In fact nothing exist on
> initial load and is constructed  dynamically later through ajax calls.
> When inspecting my dynamically built DOM elements I can see attached
> events in EventBug, but when I expand them only "not implemented in
> Javascript" is displayed. But it is. Handler is encapsulated inside a
> widget, but it exists.

What is a widget?

If you create a small but complete test case and post it to the issues
list I can take a look.
http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list
jjb

>
> On Oct 31, 12:41 pm, jayarjo <jaya...@...> wrote:
>
> > That's huge!
>
> > On Oct 30, 4:08 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:
>
> > > Eventbug released:http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/eventbug-alpha-released/
>
> > > Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.



Re: Eventbug rising

by jayarjo :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message


It's my custom built widget, on top of jQuery UI Widget framework.

I'll try to create a test case.

On Oct 31, 9:59 pm, John J Barton <johnjbar...@...> wrote:

> On Oct 31, 2:24 am, jayarjo <jaya...@...> wrote:
>
> > I've got very javascriptized web-site. In fact nothing exist on
> > initial load and is constructed  dynamically later through ajax calls.
> > When inspecting my dynamically built DOM elements I can see attached
> > events in EventBug, but when I expand them only "not implemented in
> > Javascript" is displayed. But it is. Handler is encapsulated inside a
> > widget, but it exists.
>
> What is a widget?
>
> If you create a small but complete test case and post it to the issues
> list I can take a look.http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/list
> jjb
>
>
>
> > On Oct 31, 12:41 pm, jayarjo <jaya...@...> wrote:
>
> > > That's huge!
>
> > > On Oct 30, 4:08 pm, "Honza (Jan Odvarko)" <odva...@...> wrote:
>
> > > > Eventbug released:http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/eventbug-alpha-released/
>
> > > > Honza

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Firebug" group.
To post to this group, send email to firebug@....
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to firebug+unsubscribe@....
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/firebug?hl=en.