|
»
« Return to Thread: Explanation of other meta data?
Explanation of other meta data?
by Andrew Turner-5
::
Rate this Message:
On 4/4/06, Allan Doyle <adoyle@...> wrote:
> featuretype and relationship are in the georss namespace, not the gml
> namespace.
Ok - I wasn't sure. The georss site just says there are these "Tags"
available, but has no actual specification for their namespace,
formats, etc.
> As far as whether to use a gml:Point or a georss:point, I guess
> that's up to you but if you're not using any other GML and you don't
> need to have things in other coordinate reference systems, then you
> can stick with georss:point.
I was just using the examples from the GeoRSS webpage.
>
> I'm sure when the "real" XML people on this list wake up, they will
> either have more to say or can correct me if I'm wrong...
>
vs. the 'imaginary' XML people that live in the back-left corner of my laptop.
> I think we need more examples!
>
Exactly, I don't mind putting some together (as I'm adding them to my
projects), but in order to do that, you 'higher ups' need to clarify
on unspecified formatting. :)
Andrew
> Allan
>
> On Apr 4, 2006, at 07:02, Andrew Turner wrote:
>
> > I am adding GeoRSS support to some of my projects and wanted to get
> > some clarification on some of the other meta data that can be
> > optionally included in a georss:where node.
> >
> > Relationship Tag and Feature Type Tag are two examples not really
> > specified in the verbage on the site, or in the GML documentation.
> > Should they be used as such:
> >
> > <georss:where>
> > <gml:featuretype>location mountaintop alps</gml:featuretype>
> > <gml:relationship>is-located-at</gml:relationship>
> > <gml:Point>
> > <gml:pos>42.366813 11.106217</gml:pos>
> > </gml:Point>
> > </georss:where>
> >
> > or
> > <gml:featuretypetag>location, mountain top, alps</
> > gml:featuretypetag>
> >
> > Seems worthwhile to specify/suggest a format for multiple values
> > within the tags for parsers to know how to handle the values.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Turner
> > ajturner@... 42.4266N x 83.4931W
> > http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA
> > _______________________________________________
> > georss mailing list
> > georss@...
> > http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
> >
>
> --
> Allan Doyle
> +1.781.433.2695
> adoyle@...
>
>
>
>
--
Andrew Turner
ajturner@... 42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA
--
Andrew Turner
ajturner@... 42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA
_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss@...
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
> featuretype and relationship are in the georss namespace, not the gml
> namespace.
Ok - I wasn't sure. The georss site just says there are these "Tags"
available, but has no actual specification for their namespace,
formats, etc.
> As far as whether to use a gml:Point or a georss:point, I guess
> that's up to you but if you're not using any other GML and you don't
> need to have things in other coordinate reference systems, then you
> can stick with georss:point.
I was just using the examples from the GeoRSS webpage.
>
> I'm sure when the "real" XML people on this list wake up, they will
> either have more to say or can correct me if I'm wrong...
>
vs. the 'imaginary' XML people that live in the back-left corner of my laptop.
> I think we need more examples!
>
Exactly, I don't mind putting some together (as I'm adding them to my
projects), but in order to do that, you 'higher ups' need to clarify
on unspecified formatting. :)
Andrew
> Allan
>
> On Apr 4, 2006, at 07:02, Andrew Turner wrote:
>
> > I am adding GeoRSS support to some of my projects and wanted to get
> > some clarification on some of the other meta data that can be
> > optionally included in a georss:where node.
> >
> > Relationship Tag and Feature Type Tag are two examples not really
> > specified in the verbage on the site, or in the GML documentation.
> > Should they be used as such:
> >
> > <georss:where>
> > <gml:featuretype>location mountaintop alps</gml:featuretype>
> > <gml:relationship>is-located-at</gml:relationship>
> > <gml:Point>
> > <gml:pos>42.366813 11.106217</gml:pos>
> > </gml:Point>
> > </georss:where>
> >
> > or
> > <gml:featuretypetag>location, mountain top, alps</
> > gml:featuretypetag>
> >
> > Seems worthwhile to specify/suggest a format for multiple values
> > within the tags for parsers to know how to handle the values.
> >
> > Andrew
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Turner
> > ajturner@... 42.4266N x 83.4931W
> > http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA
> > _______________________________________________
> > georss mailing list
> > georss@...
> > http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
> >
>
> --
> Allan Doyle
> +1.781.433.2695
> adoyle@...
>
>
>
>
--
Andrew Turner
ajturner@... 42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA
--
Andrew Turner
ajturner@... 42.4266N x 83.4931W
http://highearthorbit.com Northville, Michigan, USA
_______________________________________________
georss mailing list
georss@...
http://lists.eogeo.org/mailman/listinfo/georss
« Return to Thread: Explanation of other meta data?
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
