Feedback on Search Page in JTrac 2.1 Beta

[Saurb]

I think that the search in 2.0 was better than 2.1 because in 2.1 I need
extra keystrokes to expand the search criteria for fields that have list of
values. First I need to select the search criteria and pick "has values".
This will dynamically get the list of values for the field. Then I have to
choose from the list of values. In the earlier version I could directly
select the criteria, which was much more efficient for me from a usability
standpoint. Now I have one extra step to perform the search. The new search
page does not look good to me. If you like I can email screenshots comparing
the old search page with the new.

Thank you!
Saurabh Banerjee
Sr. Manager (Software Engineering Group)
Acclaris India
STP-II, Block- DN, Plot # 53, Sector V
Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091,India
Cell:   [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Work: [phone] Ext. 124
Email: Saurabh.banerjee@...

"If you only do what you know you can do- you never do very much." - Tom
Krause

PRIVACY/CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication may contain
private, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the
sole use of the designated and/or duly authorized recipient(s). If you are
not the intended recipient or have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately by email to
privacy.officer@... <blocked::mailto:privacy.officer@...>
or by telephone at 1-813-873-2020, and delete all copies of this e-mail,
including all attachments, without reading them or saving them to your
computer or any attached storage device. If you are the intended recipient,
you will need to secure the contents conforming to all applicable state
and/or federal requirements related to the privacy and confidentiality of
such information, including the HIPAA Privacy guidelines.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Staffan Olsson]

Hello,

I have a suggestion on how to make search more easy and quick: have a
simple search box at the top of the page, with an extra submit button.
That field searches summary and details fields together with "contains
the words" or something like that. Those search results (empty input
matching all issues) are then filtered by selected criterias in the
current search design.

/Staffan

On 9/28/07, Saurabh Banerjee <saurabh.banerjee@...> wrote:

> I think that the search in 2.0 was better than 2.1 because in 2.1 I need
> extra keystrokes to expand the search criteria for fields that have list of
> values. First I need to select the search criteria and pick "has values".
> This will dynamically get the list of values for the field. Then I have to
> choose from the list of values. In the earlier version I could directly
> select the criteria, which was much more efficient for me from a usability
> standpoint. Now I have one extra step to perform the search. The new search
> page does not look good to me. If you like I can email screenshots comparing
> the old search page with the new.
>
> Thank you!
> Saurabh Banerjee
> Sr. Manager (Software Engineering Group)
> Acclaris India
> STP-II, Block- DN, Plot # 53, Sector V
> Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091,India
> Cell:   [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> Work: [phone] Ext. 124
> Email: Saurabh.banerjee@...
>
> "If you only do what you know you can do- you never do very much." - Tom
> Krause
>
> PRIVACY/CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication may contain
> private, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the
> sole use of the designated and/or duly authorized recipient(s). If you are
> not the intended recipient or have received this communication in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by email to
> privacy.officer@... <blocked::mailto:privacy.officer@...>
> or by telephone at 1-813-873-2020, and delete all copies of this e-mail,
> including all attachments, without reading them or saving them to your
> computer or any attached storage device. If you are the intended recipient,
> you will need to secure the contents conforming to all applicable state
> and/or federal requirements related to the privacy and confidentiality of
> such information, including the HIPAA Privacy guidelines.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> j-trac-users mailing list
> j-trac-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[ptrthomas]

Hi,

I will look at the options.  This has been raised by others as well so I hear the pain :|  You can raise a feature request so we don't lose this.

Actually the version in SVN has an extra link on the search screen that displays all the field select values, I'll try to get this available as an interim-build soon.

Thanks,

Peter.

On 9/28/07, Staffan Olsson <solsson@...> wrote:

Hello,

I have a suggestion on how to make search more easy and quick: have a
simple search box at the top of the page, with an extra submit button.
That field searches summary and details fields together with "contains
the words" or something like that. Those search results (empty input
matching all issues) are then filtered by selected criterias in the
current search design.

/Staffan

On 9/28/07, Saurabh Banerjee < saurabh.banerjee@...> wrote:

> I think that the search in 2.0 was better than 2.1 because in 2.1 I need
> extra keystrokes to expand the search criteria for fields that have list of
> values. First I need to select the search criteria and pick "has values".
> This will dynamically get the list of values for the field. Then I have to
> choose from the list of values. In the earlier version I could directly
> select the criteria, which was much more efficient for me from a usability
> standpoint. Now I have one extra step to perform the search. The new search
> page does not look good to me. If you like I can email screenshots comparing
> the old search page with the new.
>
> Thank you!
> Saurabh Banerjee
> Sr. Manager (Software Engineering Group)
> Acclaris India
> STP-II, Block- DN, Plot # 53, Sector V
> Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091,India
> Cell:   [phone]
> Fax: [phone]
> Work: [phone] Ext. 124
> Email: Saurabh.banerjee@...
>
> "If you only do what you know you can do- you never do very much." - Tom
> Krause
>
> PRIVACY/CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication may contain
> private, confidential, or legally privileged information intended for the
> sole use of the designated and/or duly authorized recipient(s). If you are
> not the intended recipient or have received this communication in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by email to
> privacy.officer@... <blocked::mailto:privacy.officer@...>
> or by telephone at 1-813-873-2020, and delete all copies of this e-mail,
> including all attachments, without reading them or saving them to your
> computer or any attached storage device. If you are the intended recipient,
> you will need to secure the contents conforming to all applicable state
> and/or federal requirements related to the privacy and confidentiality of
> such information, including the HIPAA Privacy guidelines.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft

> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> j-trac-users mailing list
> j-trac-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Maksim Lin for technical support mailling lists]

Hi Peter,

If I could add my 2c:
My preference would be for a "simple search" single textbox on the top
of every page (same place as the existing search link is now) for a
search across all fields ("google style") and then next to it have the
current link that is in 2.1 now, but just rename it as "advanced search"

what do you think?

Maks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: j-trac-users-bounces@...
> [mailto:j-trac-users-bounces@...] On Behalf
> Of Peter Thomas
> Sent: Saturday, 29 September 2007 17:02
> To: JTrac users mailing-list
> Subject: Re: [jtrac-users] Feedback on Search Page in JTrac 2.1 Beta
>
> Hi,
>
> I will look at the options.  This has been raised by others
> as well so I hear the pain :|  You can raise a feature
> request so we don't lose this.
>
> Actually the version in SVN has an extra link on the search
> screen that displays all the field select values, I'll try to
> get this available as an interim-build soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Peter.
>
>
> On 9/28/07, Staffan Olsson <solsson@...> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a suggestion on how to make search more easy and
> quick: have a
> simple search box at the top of the page, with an extra
> submit button.
> That field searches summary and details fields together
> with "contains
> the words" or something like that. Those search results
> (empty input
> matching all issues) are then filtered by selected
> criterias in the
> current search design.
>
> /Staffan
>
> On 9/28/07, Saurabh Banerjee <
> saurabh.banerjee@...> wrote:
> > I think that the search in 2.0 was better than 2.1
> because in 2.1 I need
> > extra keystrokes to expand the search criteria for
> fields that have list of
> > values. First I need to select the search criteria
> and pick "has values".
> > This will dynamically get the list of values for the
> field. Then I have to
> > choose from the list of values. In the earlier
> version I could directly
> > select the criteria, which was much more efficient
> for me from a usability
> > standpoint. Now I have one extra step to perform the
> search. The new search
> > page does not look good to me. If you like I can
> email screenshots comparing
> > the old search page with the new.
> >
> > Thank you!
> > Saurabh Banerjee
> > Sr. Manager (Software Engineering Group)
> > Acclaris India
> > STP-II, Block- DN, Plot # 53, Sector V
> > Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700091,India
> > Cell:   [phone]
> > Fax: [phone]
> > Work: [phone] Ext. 124
> > Email: Saurabh.banerjee@...
> >
> > "If you only do what you know you can do- you never
> do very much." - Tom
> > Krause
> >
> > PRIVACY/CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail
> communication may contain
> > private, confidential, or legally privileged
> information intended for the
> > sole use of the designated and/or duly authorized
> recipient(s). If you are
> > not the intended recipient or have received this
> communication in error,
> > please notify the sender immediately by email to
> > privacy.officer@...
> <blocked::mailto:privacy.officer@...>
> > or by telephone at 1-813-873-2020, and delete all
> copies of this e-mail,
> > including all attachments, without reading them or
> saving them to your
> > computer or any attached storage device. If you are
> the intended recipient,
> > you will need to secure the contents conforming to
> all applicable state
> > and/or federal requirements related to the privacy
> and confidentiality of
> > such information, including the HIPAA Privacy guidelines.
> >
> >
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > j-trac-users mailing list
> > j-trac-users@...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users 
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ 
> <http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/>
> _______________________________________________
> j-trac-users mailing list
> j-trac-users@...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
>
>
>
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Колесников Михаил-2]

Hi All!
In our company we used JTrac with an LDAP Authentication for a years. In addition we use the same LDAP for SVN users. Sometimes users in JTrac try to change password and was surprised as it's not result in LDAP (and isn't change SVN password too).
To prevent such a case we patch JTrac in order to update users info and password in LDAP when someone change password in JTrac.

Is anybody interesting in such a patch? It allows to use JTrac as a simple LDAP manager. IMHO the best choice for a small company.

PS: I can prepare clear code by the end of may. It's needed to patch JTrac, JTracImpl, ProviderManagerFactoryBean and JtracLdapAuthenticationProvider (and applicationContext-acegi.xml of course). Also it's need to change JtracConfigurer - to specify SuperUser DN/password for create new users in LDAP.

--
Kolesnikov Mikhail (http://kolemik.ya.ru/)
mailto:mixa_@...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Manos Batsis]

Колесников Михаил wrote:
> Hi All!
> In our company we used JTrac with an LDAP Authentication for a years. In addition we use the same LDAP for SVN users. Sometimes users in JTrac try to change password and was surprised as it's not result in LDAP (and isn't change SVN password too).
> To prevent such a case we patch JTrac in order to update users info and password in LDAP when someone change password in JTrac.
>
> Is anybody interesting in such a patch? It allows to use JTrac as a simple LDAP manager. IMHO the best choice for a small company.
>
> PS: I can prepare clear code by the end of may. It's needed to patch JTrac, JTracImpl, ProviderManagerFactoryBean and JtracLdapAuthenticationProvider (and applicationContext-acegi.xml of course). Also it's need to change JtracConfigurer - to specify SuperUser DN/password for create new users in LDAP.
>

We would be *very* interested in this patch.

Manos

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Колесников Михаил-2]

06.05.09, 15:52, "Manos Batsis" <manos_lists@...>:

> Kolesnikov Mikhail wrote:
> > Hi All!
> > In our company we used JTrac with an LDAP Authentication for a years. In addition we use the same LDAP for SVN users. Sometimes users in JTrac try to change password and was surprised as it's not result in LDAP (and isn't change SVN password too).
> > To prevent such a case we patch JTrac in order to update users info and password in LDAP when someone change password in JTrac.
> >
> > Is anybody interesting in such a patch? It allows to use JTrac as a simple LDAP manager. IMHO the best choice for a small company.
> >
> > PS: I can prepare clear code by the end of may. It's needed to patch JTrac, JTracImpl, ProviderManagerFactoryBean and JtracLdapAuthenticationProvider (and applicationContext-acegi.xml of course). Also it's need to change JtracConfigurer - to specify SuperUser DN/password for create new users in LDAP.
> >
> We would be *very* interested in this patch.
> Manos

Let's wait Peter. May be Peter dosen't approve to change JTrac interface and JTracImpl. But I'm need to add a setter in JTrac to setup a link to AuthProvider used in system. That allow us to use "hard" setup (in applicationContext-acegi.xml) of AuthProvider as like as "properties" setup. And more. I decided that only one AuthProvider must work (not like at this time - see ProviderManagerFactoryBean.getObject).

Still open for discussion ;)

--
Kolesnikov Mikhail
mailto:mixa_@...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Manos Batsis]

Колесников Михаил wrote:
> Let's wait Peter. May be Peter dosen't approve to change JTrac interface
> and JTracImpl. But I'm need to add a setter in JTrac to setup a link to
> AuthProvider used in system. That allow us to use "hard" setup (in
> applicationContext-acegi.xml) of AuthProvider as like as "properties"
> setup. And more. I decided that only one AuthProvider must work (not
> like at this time - see ProviderManagerFactoryBean.getObject).
>
> Still open for discussion ;)

If you could add an initial patch on SF we could perhaps have a more
useful discussion :-)

Also, I'm not interested in it only for the trunk but also for
customized versions.

Manos

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Marc Paradise]

I would also be very interested in this patch, even were it not applied to the trunk


 

-----Original Message-----
From: Manos Batsis <manos_lists@...>

Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 16:21:51
To: <mixa_@...>; JTrac users mailing-list<j-trac-users@...>
Subject: Re: [jtrac-users] Create and edit users in LDAP with JTrac


Колесников Михаил wrote:
> Let's wait Peter. May be Peter dosen't approve to change JTrac interface
> and JTracImpl. But I'm need to add a setter in JTrac to setup a link to
> AuthProvider used in system. That allow us to use "hard" setup (in
> applicationContext-acegi.xml) of AuthProvider as like as "properties"
> setup. And more. I decided that only one AuthProvider must work (not
> like at this time - see ProviderManagerFactoryBean.getObject).
>
> Still open for discussion ;)

If you could add an initial patch on SF we could perhaps have a more
useful discussion :-)

Also, I'm not interested in it only for the trunk but also for
customized versions.

Manos

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[ptrthomas]

Please feel free to upload the patch at the JTrac patches tracker when you get a chance, let us all look at it !

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Marc Paradise <marc.paradise@...> wrote:

I would also be very interested in this patch, even were it not applied to the trunk

-----Original Message-----
From: Manos Batsis <manos_lists@...>

Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 16:21:51
To: <mixa_@...>; JTrac users mailing-list<j-trac-users@...>
Subject: Re: [jtrac-users] Create and edit users in LDAP with JTrac


Колесников Михаил wrote:
> Let's wait Peter. May be Peter dosen't approve to change JTrac interface
> and JTracImpl. But I'm need to add a setter in JTrac to setup a link to
> AuthProvider used in system. That allow us to use "hard" setup (in
> applicationContext-acegi.xml) of AuthProvider as like as "properties"
> setup. And more. I decided that only one AuthProvider must work (not
> like at this time - see ProviderManagerFactoryBean.getObject).
>
> Still open for discussion ;)

If you could add an initial patch on SF we could perhaps have a more
useful discussion :-)

Also, I'm not interested in it only for the trunk but also for
customized versions.

Manos

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Колесников Михаил-2]

06.05.09, 18:51, "Peter Thomas" <ptrthomas@...>:

Please feel free to upload the patch at the JTrac patches tracker when you get a chance, let us all look at it !

Thanks! I'm already checkout trunk@HEAD version.

I'll notify you when patch was uploaded.

--
Mikhail Kolesnikov
mailto:mixa_@...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users

[Колесников Михаил-2]

Can you please check my patch for LDAP. Now i uploaded only changes, that allowed us to update user details and password (not create one).

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2788083&group_id=162983&atid=825943

Taste it please!
--
Kolesnikov Mikhail
mailto:mixa_@...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
j-trac-users mailing list
j-trac-users@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/j-trac-users