Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks

The call for review of the WSDL 2.0 documents ends today!  If you haven’t yet voted, get your AC rep on the phone right away!

In looking at the issues raised on this list during the PR period, I propose we resolve them as follows.  Since these are fairly trivial matters, I don’t think we need a telcon for them if nobody objects to my proposed resolutions.

1) Jacek proposed a clarification at [1].  This looks like a reasonable editorial clarification, and I propose we accept his proposed resolution and incorporate it into the Rec draft.

2) Jacek also asks for some RDDL/RDF for our non-namespace URIs at [2].  I believe Philippe has prepared simple RDDL documents for these URIs per W3C policy, but it’s not clear to me what RDF should accompany the RDDL, nor who would write it.  Because it’s easy to add RDF links to the RDDLs I propose add this item to bugzilla for the future WS Core WG to address as an errata (although since it’s not an issue against the Rec so it’s really more of a work item.)

3) Bug 4590 [3] can be closed, as it's been fixed editorially.

4) Bug 4563 [4] looks like a quibble over wording – the behavior doesn’t seem to be in question.  I think it is harmless to leave this one open as a potential errata for the future WS Core WG.

So, if nobody disagrees with these resolutions by the end of business this week, I’ll ask the editors and Philippe to act accordingly and we should be able to see a Recommendation publication before our charter expires next week.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0042.html

[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0044.html

[3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4590

[4] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4563

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com