On 04/11/2009, at 16:22, monipol wrote:
> Hello, all. We've had a report from a 10.4.11 user who used the 0.8.1
> binary installer and was able to install Fink on an external HFS+
> volume without ownership enabled. I've tested the 0.9.0 installer on
> an external FAT-32 volume attached to my 10.5.8 box and it happily
> installed there, too.
>
> This is undesirable behaviour, right? I'll check the installer source
> code later.
I've just committed new xml/scripts/installer/resources/VolumeCheck
and English.lproj/VolumeCheck.strings. The code used to check
ownership and permissions is the same as the one used in fink/t/
10features/volume.t (thanks for pointing that out, dmacks). If you
could please check if my commit is okay, that'd be grand.
Cheers,
-- monipol
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july_______________________________________________
fink-core mailing list
fink-core@...
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.core
