Following up
|
View:
New views
6 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Following up
by Tim Marston
::
Rate this Message:
Hi there,
Back at the end of February, I posted some suggestions[1][2][3] for modifications to gengetopt. I wondered if I could have some feedback on them? I am expecting to have to do the work required to implement these changes (once approved, of course), but I was hoping to start some discussion about them and their suitability. All the best, [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gengetopt/2012-02/msg00002.html [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gengetopt/2012-02/msg00003.html [3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gengetopt/2012-02/msg00004.html -- Tim Marston ed.am _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list Help-gengetopt@... https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt |
|
|
Re: Following up
by Lorenzo Bettini
::
Rate this Message:
On 04/12/2012 07:54 AM, Tim Marston wrote:
> Hi there, > > Back at the end of February, I posted some suggestions[1][2][3] for > modifications to gengetopt. I wondered if I could have some feedback on them? > I am expecting to have to do the work required to implement these changes (once > approved, of course), but I was hoping to start some discussion about them and > their suitability. > > All the best, > > [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gengetopt/2012-02/msg00002.html > [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gengetopt/2012-02/msg00003.html > [3] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gengetopt/2012-02/msg00004.html > Sorry Tim I've been busy lately and I still haven't been able to look at your suggestions... please feel free to ping back if you don't hear within the next weeks cheers Lorenzo -- Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233) HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list Help-gengetopt@... https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt |
|
|
Re: Following up
by Tim Marston
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:46:52AM +0200, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > please feel free to ping back if you don't hear within the next weeks Ping! I wnodered if you had managed to find some time to have a look at those proposals I sent? Sorry to pester you, I understand that you're busy. It's just that we really need the facilities of a config file for GNU typist. I've already got a branch that uses gengetopt but, pending the outcome of discussions over some of the proposals, I can't switch to it. The other solution would be for us to use our own config file mechanism in the meantime, but this just seems like duplicate effort. Looking forwards to hearing from you! -- Tim Marston ed.am _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list Help-gengetopt@... https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt |
|
|
Re: Following up
by Lorenzo Bettini
::
Rate this Message:
On 05/02/2012 07:07 PM, Tim Marston wrote:
> Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:46:52AM +0200, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: >> please feel free to ping back if you don't hear within the next weeks > > Ping! I wnodered if you had managed to find some time to have a look at those > proposals I sent? Not yet sorry O:) just for curiosity: are the features you need already implementable manually on top of the code generated by gengetopt? I'm asking this since I wouldn't want to overload gengetopt with too many features that then become hard to maintain... hope to give you some news soon! cheers Lorenzo > > Sorry to pester you, I understand that you're busy. It's just that we really > need the facilities of a config file for GNU typist. I've already got a branch > that uses gengetopt but, pending the outcome of discussions over some of the > proposals, I can't switch to it. The other solution would be for us to use our > own config file mechanism in the meantime, but this just seems like duplicate > effort. > > Looking forwards to hearing from you! > -- Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233) HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list Help-gengetopt@... https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt |
|
|
Re: Following up
by Tim Marston
::
Rate this Message:
Hi,
On 03/05/12 08:19, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > just for curiosity: are the features you need already implementable > manually on top of the code generated by gengetopt? Yes, I could take the generated code and modify it. But I think the modifications would be extensive enough that I couldn't easily regenerate the code. So it would defeat the point of using gengetopt slightly. Or were you suggesting that I do this in the meantime in order to move forwards with gtypist? That is perhaps not such a bad idea. > I'm asking this since I wouldn't want to overload gengetopt with too > many features that then become hard to maintain... If it helps, I'm quite happy to commit myself to maintaining them (and writing them in the first place, of course). Best regards, -- Tim Marston ed.am _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list Help-gengetopt@... https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt |
|
|
Re: Following up
by Lorenzo Bettini
::
Rate this Message:
On 05/03/2012 10:13 PM, Tim Marston wrote:
> Hi, > > On 03/05/12 08:19, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: >> just for curiosity: are the features you need already implementable >> manually on top of the code generated by gengetopt? > > Yes, I could take the generated code and modify it. But I think the > modifications would be extensive enough that I couldn't easily > regenerate the code. So it would defeat the point of using gengetopt > slightly. > > Or were you suggesting that I do this in the meantime in order to move > forwards with gtypist? That is perhaps not such a bad idea. No, actually I was thinking whether, in your context, one could wrap changes around the generated code, not to modify the generated code itself, since then, as you noted, it would be hard to maintain it for subsequent modifications :) > >> I'm asking this since I wouldn't want to overload gengetopt with too >> many features that then become hard to maintain... > > If it helps, I'm quite happy to commit myself to maintaining them (and > writing them in the first place, of course). well, thanks in advance then :) hope to give you feedback about your proposals soon! cheers Lorenzo -- Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DI, Univ. Torino ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 (GNU/Linux User # 158233) HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list Help-gengetopt@... https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
