For Approval: Non-Profit OSL 3.0

View: New views
5 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

For Approval: Non-Profit OSL 3.0

by Lawrence Rosen :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Some parts of this message have been removed. Learn more about Nabble's security policy.

I submit the following Non-Profit OSL 3.0 on behalf of IETF, the Internet Engineering Task Force, for its use to distribute software tools:

 

    www.rosenlaw.com/NOSL3.0.htm

 

This is a generalized open source license suitable for use by other non-profit organizations.

 

IETF is a large open international community of network designers, operators, vendors, and researchers concerned with the evolution of the Internet architecture and the smooth operation of the Internet. It publishes protocol standards, best current practices, and informational documents of various kinds. More information about IETF can be found at www.ietf.org. The software tools that IETF creates and uses will be distributed under the new Non-Profit OSL 3.0 to help other organizations facing similar process control issues to manage large numbers of specifications and related documents and the work flows of many technical working groups.

 

IETF needs a version of the Open Software License ("OSL 3.0") that is suitable for a non-profit organization that receives no revenue whatsoever from the distribution of licensed software or derivative works, or from support or services relating to that software. IETF—like many non-profit organizations—cannot afford to offer either a warranty of provenance (OSL 3.0 s. 7, first sentence) or to accept liability for "direct" damages (not excluded in OSL 3.0 s. 8, first sentence). At the same time, they want a robust reciprocal open source license that requires the source code of derivative works of IETF open source tools to be disclosed—when they are distributed as traditional copies or when they are used over a network, which OSL 3.0 already provides (see s. 1(c) and s. 5 of both OSL 3.0 and Non-Profit OSL 3.0).

 

The very few substantive differences between OSL 3.0 and the Non-Profit OSL 3 are described in a new s. 17, at the end of the new license itself. A redlined comparison of the two versions is at www.rosenlaw.com/NOSL3.0-red.htm.

 

Please note that OSL 3.0 and the Non-Profit OSL 3.0 remain compatible. If a distributor of software cannot make the declaration of s. 17(a) in the Non-Profit OSL 3.0, it must distribute that software and derivative works under the original OSL 3.0 license, including the warranty of provenance and potential liability for direct damages.

 

Since the new Non-Profit OSL 3.0 does not otherwise affect any part of the open source bargain, it should be approved for the same reasons that the original OSL 3.0 license was approved.

 

Please direct your comments about IETF and its licensing model to Jorge Contreras, attorney for IETF. His email address is jorge.contreras@..., and he is cc'd on this email.

 

Please let me know if you need any additional information for OSI's approval process.

 

A plain-text version of the Non-Profit OSL 3.0 license is below, although I encourage you to read the formatted version at www.rosenlaw.com/NOSL3.0.htm:

 

********************************

 

Non-Profit Open Software License ("Non-Profit OSL") 3.0

 

This Non-Profit Open Software License ("Non-Profit OSL") version 3.0 (the "License") applies to any original work of authorship (the "Original Work") whose owner (the "Licensor") has placed the following licensing notice adjacent to the copyright notice for the Original Work:

 

Licensed under the Non-Profit Open Software License version 3.0

 

1) Grant of Copyright License. Licensor grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, sublicensable license, for the duration of the copyright, to do the following:

 

a) to reproduce the Original Work in copies, either alone or as part of a collective work;

 

b) to translate, adapt, alter, transform, modify, or arrange the Original Work, thereby creating derivative works ("Derivative Works") based upon the Original Work;

 

c) to distribute or communicate copies of the Original Work and Derivative Works to the public, with the proviso that copies of Original Work or Derivative Works that You distribute or communicate shall be licensed under this Non-Profit Open Software License or as provided in section 17(d);

 

d) to perform the Original Work publicly; and

 

e) to display the Original Work publicly.

 

2) Grant of Patent License. Licensor grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, sublicensable license, under patent claims owned or controlled by the Licensor that are embodied in the Original Work as furnished by the Licensor, for the duration of the patents, to make, use, sell, offer for sale, have made, and import the Original Work and Derivative Works.

 

3) Grant of Source Code License. The term "Source Code" means the preferred form of the Original Work for making modifications to it and all available documentation describing how to modify the Original Work. Licensor agrees to provide a machine-readable copy of the Source Code of the Original Work along with each copy of the Original Work that Licensor distributes. Licensor reserves the right to satisfy this obligation by placing a machine-readable copy of the Source Code in an information repository reasonably calculated to permit inexpensive and convenient access by You for as long as Licensor continues to distribute the Original Work.

 

4) Exclusions From License Grant. Neither the names of Licensor, nor the names of any contributors to the Original Work, nor any of their trademarks or service marks, may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this Original Work without express prior permission of the Licensor. Except as expressly stated herein, nothing in this License grants any license to Licensor’s trademarks, copyrights, patents, trade secrets or any other intellectual property. No patent license is granted to make, use, sell, offer for sale, have made, or import embodiments of any patent claims other than the licensed claims defined in Section 2. No license is granted to the trademarks of Licensor even if such marks are included in the Original Work. Nothing in this License shall be interpreted to prohibit Licensor from licensing under terms different from this License any Original Work that Licensor otherwise would have a right to license.

 

5) External Deployment. The term "External Deployment" means the use, distribution, or communication of the Original Work or Derivative Works in any way such that the Original Work or Derivative Works may be used by anyone other than You, whether those works are distributed or communicated to those persons or made available as an application intended for use over a network. As an express condition for the grants of license hereunder, You must treat any External Deployment by You of the Original Work or a Derivative Work as a distribution under section 1(c).

 

6) Attribution Rights. You must retain, in the Source Code of any Derivative Works that You create, all copyright, patent, or trademark notices from the Source Code of the Original Work, as well as any notices of licensing and any descriptive text identified therein as an "Attribution Notice." You must cause the Source Code for any Derivative Works that You create to carry a prominent Attribution Notice reasonably calculated to inform recipients that You have modified the Original Work.

 

7) Warranty of Provenance and Disclaimer of Warranty. The Original Work is provided under this License on an "AS IS" BASIS and WITHOUT WARRANTY, either express or implied, including, without limitation, the warranties of non-infringement, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. THE ENTIRE RISK AS TO THE QUALITY OF THE ORIGINAL WORK IS WITH YOU. This DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY constitutes an essential part of this License. No license to the Original Work is granted by this License except under this disclaimer.

 

8) Limitation of Liability. Under no circumstances and under no legal theory, whether in tort (including negligence), contract, or otherwise, shall the Licensor be liable to anyone for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages of any character arising as a result of this License or the use of the Original Work including, without limitation, damages for loss of goodwill, work stoppage, computer failure or malfunction, or any and all other commercial damages or losses. This limitation of liability shall not apply to the extent applicable law prohibits such limitation.

 

9) Acceptance and Termination. If, at any time, You expressly assented to this License, that assent indicates your clear and irrevocable acceptance of this License and all of its terms and conditions. If You distribute or communicate copies of the Original Work or a Derivative Work, You must make a reasonable effort under the circumstances to obtain the express assent of recipients to the terms of this License. This License conditions your rights to undertake the activities listed in Section 1, including your right to create Derivative Works based upon the Original Work, and doing so without honoring these terms and conditions is prohibited by copyright law and international treaty. Nothing in this License is intended to affect copyright exceptions and limitations (including “fair use” or “fair dealing”). This License shall terminate immediately and You may no longer exercise any of the rights granted to You by this License upon your failure to honor the conditions in Section 1(c).

 

10) Termination for Patent Action. This License shall terminate automatically and You may no longer exercise any of the rights granted to You by this License as of the date You commence an action, including a cross-claim or counterclaim, against Licensor or any licensee alleging that the Original Work infringes a patent. This termination provision shall not apply for an action alleging patent infringement by combinations of the Original Work with other software or hardware.

 

11) Jurisdiction, Venue and Governing Law. Any action or suit relating to this License may be brought only in the courts of a jurisdiction wherein the Licensor resides or in which Licensor conducts its primary business, and under the laws of that jurisdiction excluding its conflict-of-law provisions. The application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods is expressly excluded. Any use of the Original Work outside the scope of this License or after its termination shall be subject to the requirements and penalties of copyright or patent law in the appropriate jurisdiction. This section shall survive the termination of this License.

 

12) Attorneys’ Fees. In any action to enforce the terms of this License or seeking damages relating thereto, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with such action, including any appeal of such action. This section shall survive the termination of this License.

 

13) Miscellaneous. If any provision of this License is held to be unenforceable, such provision shall be reformed only to the extent necessary to make it enforceable.

 

14) Definition of "You" in This License. "You" throughout this License, whether in upper or lower case, means an individual or a legal entity exercising rights under, and complying with all of the terms of, this License. For legal entities, "You" includes any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with you. For purposes of this definition, "control" means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or otherwise, or (ii) ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the outstanding shares, or (iii) beneficial ownership of such entity.

 

15) Right to Use. You may use the Original Work in all ways not otherwise restricted or conditioned by this License or by law, and Licensor promises not to interfere with or be responsible for such uses by You.

 

16) Modification of This License. This License is Copyright © 2005 Lawrence Rosen. Permission is granted to copy, distribute, or communicate this License without modification. Nothing in this License permits You to modify this License as applied to the Original Work or to Derivative Works. However, You may modify the text of this License and copy, distribute or communicate your modified version (the "Modified License") and apply it to other original works of authorship subject to the following conditions: (i) You may not indicate in any way that your Modified License is the "Open Software License" or "OSL" and you may not use those names in the name of your Modified License; (ii) You must replace the notice specified in the first paragraph above with the notice "Licensed under <insert your license name here>" or with a notice of your own that is not confusingly similar to the notice in this License; and (iii) You may not claim that your original works are open source software unless your Modified License has been approved by Open Source Initiative (OSI) and You comply with its license review and certification process.

 

17) Non-Profit Amendment. The name of this amended version of the Open Software License ("OSL 3.0") is "Non-Profit Open Software License 3.0". The original OSL 3.0 license has been amended as follows:

 

(a) Licensor represents and declares that it is a not-for-profit organization that derives no revenue whatsoever from the distribution of the Original Work or Derivative Works thereof, or from support or services relating thereto.

 

(b) The first sentence of Section 7 ["Warranty of Provenance"] of OSL 3.0 has been stricken. For Original Works licensed under this Non-Profit OSL 3.0, LICENSOR OFFERS NO WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER.

 

(c) In the first sentence of Section 8 ["Limitation of Liability"] of this Non-Profit OSL 3.0, the list of damages for which LIABILITY IS LIMITED now includes "direct" damages.

 

(d) The proviso in Section 1(c) of this License now refers to this "Non-Profit Open Software License" rather than the "Open Software License". You may distribute or communicate the Original Work or Derivative Works thereof under this Non-Profit OSL 3.0 license only if You make the representation and declaration in paragraph (a) of this Section 17. Otherwise, You shall distribute or communicate the Original Work or Derivative Works thereof only under the OSL 3.0 license and You shall publish clear licensing notices so stating. Also by way of clarification, this License does not authorize You to distribute or communicate works under this Non-Profit OSL 3.0 if You received them under the original OSL 3.0 license.

 

(e) Original Works licensed under this license shall reference "Non-Profit OSL 3.0" in licensing notices to distinguish them from works licensed under the original OSL 3.0 license.

 

 


Re: For Approval: Non-Profit OSL 3.0

by John Cowan :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Lawrence Rosen scripsit:

> Since the new Non-Profit OSL 3.0 does not otherwise affect any part of the
> open source bargain, it should be approved for the same reasons that the
> original OSL 3.0 license was approved.

+1

You need to fix up s. 16, though, to refer to the NOSL, or in the alternative to both NOSL and OSL.

--
"The serene chaos that is Courage, and the phenomenon   cowan@...
of Unopened Consciousness have been known to the        John Cowan
Great World eons longer than Extaboulism."
"Why is that?" the woman inquired.
"Because I just made that word up", the Master said wisely.
        --Kehlog Albran, The Profit             http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

Re: For Approval: Non-Profit OSL 3.0

by Chuck Swiger :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:51 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> Lawrence Rosen scripsit:
>> Since the new Non-Profit OSL 3.0 does not otherwise affect any  
>> part of the
>> open source bargain, it should be approved for the same reasons  
>> that the
>> original OSL 3.0 license was approved.
>
> +1

Seconded, but with a caveat I'll detail below.

> You need to fix up s. 16, though, to refer to the NOSL, or in the  
> alternative to both NOSL and OSL.

Nice catch, agreed.

If there were more significant differences between the OSL and the  
NOSL, I would be concerned by the requirement in 17(d) for people who  
redistribute the software released by the IETF under the NOSL to use  
the OSL, unless they can claim 17(a).  Arguably, this encroaches upon  
OSD #7 and perhaps OSD #5.

What value does the IETF gain from making the assertion in 17(a) and  
insisting that people who are not non-profit organizations must  
relicense under the OSL, instead?

--
-Chuck


RE: For Approval: Non-Profit OSL 3.0

by Lawrence Rosen :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

> > You need to fix up s. 16, though, to refer to the NOSL, or in the
> > alternative to both NOSL and OSL.
>
> Nice catch, agreed.

As an author of licenses, I'm not interested in protecting the "non-profit"
part of the name. What's important (to me at least) is the "OSL" name for
license(s), which is dealt with by the existing s. 16 and which covers the
OSL part "Non-Profit OSL 3.0" well enough as written. This new license name
obviously has my approval. :-)

> What value does the IETF gain from making the assertion in 17(a) and
> insisting that people who are not non-profit organizations must
> relicense under the OSL, instead?

I'll try to answer that question rather than put the burden on IETF's
attorney to do so. That requirement was made because (in my opinion) open
source customers should expect their *commercial* (i.e., for-profit)
software suppliers to offer a warranty of provenance and to accept liability
for direct damages.

This is not about what IETF gains by that requirement, but what open source
customers gain by being able to rely on the diligence and reliability of the
*commercial* suppliers of their OSL-licensed open source software. IETF
didn't ask for the requirement; I put it there and IETF doesn't mind.

Those warranty and liability provisions have been in OSL 3.0 since the
beginning (and they are in many other licenses as well!). Weakening them in
NOSL 3.0 for non-profit distributors--and requiring that they be restored
for for-profit distributors--obviously doesn't affect whether the new
license conforms to the OSD.

/Larry

P.S. There are long threads in the OSI archives about OSL 3.0. Rather than
repeat discussions here about the warranty of provenance and limitations of
liability, you might want to look in the archives first. I explained the
warranty of provenance and liability obligations in my article, "Allocation
of the Risk," which I published several years ago in Linux Journal
(http://rosenlaw.com/lj15.htm). I also described the OSL warranty and
liability provisions in some detail in Chapter 9 (on pages 198-206) of my
book (http://rosenlaw.com/oslbook.htm).
 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Swiger [mailto:chuck@...]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2007 5:02 PM
> To: John Cowan
> Cc: Lawrence Rosen; 'License Discuss'; 'Contreras, Jorge'
> Subject: Re: For Approval: Non-Profit OSL 3.0
>
> On Aug 6, 2007, at 3:51 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> > Lawrence Rosen scripsit:
> >> Since the new Non-Profit OSL 3.0 does not otherwise affect any
> >> part of the
> >> open source bargain, it should be approved for the same reasons
> >> that the
> >> original OSL 3.0 license was approved.
> >
> > +1
>
> Seconded, but with a caveat I'll detail below.
>
> > You need to fix up s. 16, though, to refer to the NOSL, or in the
> > alternative to both NOSL and OSL.
>
> Nice catch, agreed.
>
> If there were more significant differences between the OSL and the
> NOSL, I would be concerned by the requirement in 17(d) for people who
> redistribute the software released by the IETF under the NOSL to use
> the OSL, unless they can claim 17(a).  Arguably, this encroaches upon
> OSD #7 and perhaps OSD #5.
>
> What value does the IETF gain from making the assertion in 17(a) and
> insisting that people who are not non-profit organizations must
> relicense under the OSL, instead?
>
> --
> -Chuck


Re: For Approval: Non-Profit OSL 3.0

by David Woolley (E.L) :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Lawrence Rosen wrote:

> I'll try to answer that question rather than put the burden on IETF's
> attorney to do so. That requirement was made because (in my opinion) open
> source customers should expect their *commercial* (i.e., for-profit)
> software suppliers to offer a warranty of provenance and to accept liability
> for direct damages.

I'd still say it was discrimination against a field of endeavour.  I
think you should strike it and include explanatory text, outside of the
formal, legal, requirements, explaining the benefits of making the
warranty (i.e. people are more likely to use the software).

--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.