FreeBSD database performance via JDBC

View: New views
3 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

FreeBSD database performance via JDBC

by Antoine Martin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi all,

I published this paper a few weeks ago that some of you might find
interesting (see part2: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Solaris):
http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/
I have to admit I have been a Linux user for many years and I was
expecting it to come out on top, and if anything I expected Solaris to
do better - after all the tests are written in Java. All my predictions
turned out wrong!
Feel free to forward to [advocacy], re-use the graphs, etc.

Enjoy
Antoine
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGNbm0GK2zHPGK1rsRCkKbAJ9AWLV/8O4kl0zveaGVapIlUxNkHQCfc0nP
WSkM6BNRH4r0ZrDIpWOQ8/o=
=h5A4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-database@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-database
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-database-unsubscribe@..."

Re: FreeBSD database performance via JDBC

by Ivan Voras-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Antoine Martin wrote:
> I published this paper a few weeks ago that some of you might find
> interesting (see part2: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Solaris):
> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/
> I have to admit I have been a Linux user for many years and I was
> expecting it to come out on top, and if anything I expected Solaris to
> do better - after all the tests are written in Java. All my predictions
> turned out wrong!
> Feel free to forward to [advocacy], re-use the graphs, etc.

Can you try it again with libthr threading library
(http://threads.seas.gwu.edu/cgi-bin/man2web?program=libmap.conf§ion=5)?
There's intent to make libthr the default for 7.0 and it may perform
worse in exactly this kind of benchmarks.



signature.asc (257 bytes) Download Attachment

Re: FreeBSD database performance via JDBC

by Antoine Martin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

>> I published this paper a few weeks ago that some of you might find
>> interesting (see part2: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Solaris):
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/
>> I have to admit I have been a Linux user for many years and I was
>> expecting it to come out on top, and if anything I expected Solaris
>> to do better - after all the tests are written in Java. All my
>> predictions
>> turned out wrong!
>> Feel free to forward to [advocacy], re-use the graphs, etc.

> Can you try it again with libthr threading library
>
http://threads.seas.gwu.edu/cgi-bin/man2web?program=libmap.conf§ion=5?
> There's intent to make libthr the default for 7.0 and it may perform
> worse in exactly this kind of benchmarks.

You can run the benchmarks yourself, see:
http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/DIY/
It's as simple as running this from the top:
ant -f test.xml junit.dbperf -Ddatabase=db-connection
(but it won't generate the pretty graphics)

I'll certainly put it on my todo list, but I can't guarantee when it
will get done... - just looking at the todo list is on the list ;)

Cheers
Antoine

PS: not subscribed to this list, so please CC me.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGONd5GK2zHPGK1rsRCuNnAJ9UT4YxcVtwUUkoEFC3FB8/VHyDeQCfclBq
eDxd6K1nxBjakVVAOVi4kwI=
=dQoJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-database@... mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-database
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-database-unsubscribe@..."