On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:55:18AM +1100, Michael Day wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The asm_fast grade is still faster for us than the hlc grade, but it
> seems that there are issues supporting asm_fast with gcc 4.
>
> Will the asm_fast grade be deprecated in the future, or will it be
> possible to revive it? gcc 3.4 won't be usable forever, especially on
> platforms like MacOS X which require customised gcc variants.
Hi Michael,
Zoltan and I have been working on these problems and have some partial
solutions. We want (and need) to maintain the low level C grades as the
profilers and debuggers rely on them. Also as you say asm_fast is faster for
some programs.
This work is something at occurs in some of our spare time, which their isn't a
lot off. Therefore, this takes longer than we'd like it to.
> Alternatively, is there another option for the future, like using the
> gcc back-end, or LLVM in Mercury?
I'd be interested in having an LLVM backend for Mercury. The main problem here
again is resourcing, we'd need somebody to implement it and then people to
maintain it.
We'll probably make some sort of announcement when our ROTD builds work with
GCC 4.x.
Thanks.
signature.asc (500 bytes) 