|
Fw: Typo in XForms 1.1 Proposed Recommendation 18 August 2009
Just in case this doesn't make it by
another means...
----- Forwarded by John
Boyer/CanWest/IBM on 10/21/2009 04:18 PM -----
| From:
| Jeff Schering/CanWest/IBM
|
| To:
| John Boyer/CanWest/IBM@IBMCA
|
| Date:
| 10/21/2009 11:42 AM
|
| Subject:
| Fw: Typo in XForms 1.1 Proposed Recommendation
18 August 2009 |
Hi John
Last week I stumbled upon a typo in
the XForms spec. I mentioned it to Vlad who told me to simply send an email
to www-forms-editor@... and that you would end up seeing it. I did not
know at the time that www-forms-editor is a mailing list. Apparently my
message is still waiting to be moderated in because when I looked at the
public archive this morning (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2009Oct/)
it was still not there.
So I guess that means you do not know
about it yet, and now the standard is an official recommendation! In any
case, something for the backlog.
Cheers,
Jeff
Jeff Schering | Information Developer
| IBM Canada Software Lab - Victoria Site | Tel: 250-294-7465 | schering@...
----- Forwarded by Jeff
Schering/CanWest/IBM on 2009/10/21 11:35 -----
| From:
| Jeff Schering/CanWest/IBM
|
| To:
| www-forms-editor@...
|
| Date:
| 2009/10/16 11:07
|
| Subject:
| Typo in XForms 1.1 Proposed Recommendation
18 August 2009 |
Hi
While perusing the XForms 1.1. spec,
I stumbled upon a typo in the Glossary of Terms, here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xforms11/#def-valid-node.
In the definition of valid node, "byt" should probably be "by".
Cheers,
Jeff
Jeff Schering | Information Developer
| IBM Canada Software Lab - Victoria Site
|
