|
View:
New views
2 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Enhanced PIC16 ArchitectureThanks David,
I know svn diff would be easiest on you but I was not using svn on my end and made 11 versions. I will send the final product. ________________________________ From: daviebdawg@... [mailto:daviebdawg@...] On Behalf Of David Barnett Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 6:28 AM To: gnupic@... Cc: Joseph Julicher - C10948 Subject: Fwd: Enhanced PIC16 Architecture On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 2:08 AM, <Joseph.Julicher@...> wrote: Hello, I am an architect at Microchip Technology and we are enhancing the 14 bit PICmicro. ... I have attached 2 overview documents for the new system. I have updated GPASM and I would like to send a tgz of the system but the e-mail size limit was reached. Let me know where to send it. The best thing to do would be to create a patch instead of a big tgz. If you've still got the files in an SVN repository, you can run "svn diff > p14e.patch" on the command line and send that file. If you could do that and send it to the gputils patch tracker <http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=add&group_id=41924&atid=431667> , that would be best. Otherwise, you can send it to me either at merc64@... or davidbarnett2@..., and there shouldn't be any size limits on my end (but then I'll create a diff and upload it to the patch tracker just the same). I'm right in the middle of some critical changes leading up to 0.14.0, so I may not get to it right away, but I'll make sure the support gets included in the next release, just over the horizon. I have sent this directly to the 4 of you because I do not have the bandwidth to answer questions on the whole mailing list. James Bowman and Craig Franklin are probably not too interested in gputils news these days. Scott Dattalo might be tracking our progress, but for now I'm the main gputils contact. We also have a lot of active users involved on the mailing list. Hope that answers your questions. David |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |